My wife cannot appreciate how awesome a Pacquiao-Mayweather fight would be

The fight would have been awesome a few years ago, now not as much.

who and who?

Freedom Trail wrote:

After both fighters met face to face last night, I am actually optimistic this fight will happen. I've told my wife that if it happens, I'm down for the ppv fee. She thinks that's nuts. But she doesn't get a vote.

It's things like this that seriously test my patience with women.

JIM RYUN > Women.

Freedom Trail wrote:

After both fighters met face to face last night, I am actually optimistic this fight will happen. I've told my wife that if it happens, I'm down for the ppv fee. She thinks that's nuts. But she doesn't get a vote.

It's things like this that seriously test my patience with women.

Does she appreciate your penis? Then that's all you need.

Uh... I can't appreciate it either, I guess.

Freedom Trail wrote:

After both fighters met face to face last night, I am actually optimistic this fight will happen. I've told my wife that if it happens, I'm down for the ppv fee. She thinks that's nuts. But she doesn't get a vote.

It's things like this that seriously test my patience with women.

Source please of there meeting yesterday? ?

PTO wrote:

Freedom Trail wrote:

After both fighters met face to face last night, I am actually optimistic this fight will happen. I've told my wife that if it happens, I'm down for the ppv fee. She thinks that's nuts. But she doesn't get a vote.

It's things like this that seriously test my patience with women.

Source please of there meeting yesterday? ?

tycobb is correct. A number of years ago, this would have been an awesome fight. Now it should be a very good fight but neither guy is as good as they were in the past even if Mayweather is still undefeated.

Thanks for the link. Looks like it might happen May2nd. Unfortunately I think it's to late for Pacquiao.

And for the record my wife wouldn't care either.

Why would it be awesome? My boy Mayweather has NEVER lost. He's 47 and 0.

Pacquiao hasn't won 7 of his fights - 7 (losing 5, drawing 2). He's lost 2 of his last 5.

So why would it be awesome unless you want to see a beatdown of Manny.

rojo wrote:

Why would it be awesome? My boy Mayweather has NEVER lost. He's 47 and 0.

Pacquiao hasn't won 7 of his fights - 7 (losing 5, drawing 2). He's lost 2 of his last 5.

So why would it be awesome unless you want to see a beatdown of Manny.

You do realize that some of those losses were when many was like an 18 year old 112 lb figher. A lot has changed over the years. Great fighters lose fights, it happens when you actually fight the best. It just happens that all of mannys losses have been to guys who will be in the hall of fame. Also, no one with half a brain thinks he lost to bradley so don't even count that one.

Other than that, he has lost to eric morales (who he went on to destroy in the next two fights) and JMM who he also beat 2 times.

It would be awesome because it would still be the biggest non-heavyweight fight of alltime, blowing away mayweather/delahoya. If marcos maidana can win rounds against mayweathr, manny sure as hell can.

mellow seeds wrote:

[quote]

It would be awesome because it would still be the biggest non-heavyweight fight of alltime, blowing away mayweather/delahoya. If marcos maidana can win rounds against mayweathr, manny sure as hell can.

I wouldn't say of all time. But at least since Hagler-Leonard.

Manny would not do the drug tests in the past so now he has to crawl and get only a 40/60 split.

Floyd is the baddest man on the planet in the fight game.

Floyd has already beaten many on the financials and will beat him in the ring

Manny cant out point Floyd so he has to knock him out. Hard to do at manny sage and without and performance assistance

This will be billed as a huge fight but it will be a bloody tenderizing of manny.

I am thinking it will be another Duran no mas.