Paula Radcliffe RACING this weekend

Who?

ohw wrote:

Who?

For your information:

She’s the athlete that happens to have run the three fastest marathon times ever run by a female.

she is doing the 10k.

doper

Slanderer!

she's filthy wrote:

doper

she's clean!!!! wrote:

Slanderer!

she's filthy wrote:

doper

bobblehead is a doper

Binks wrote:

She’s the athlete that happens to have run the three fastest marathon times ever run by a female.

but in any case, back on the juice.

Because she was that good and that far ahead of the other females...accept it, she was just better and you don't like it.

So you say wrote:

Binks wrote:

She’s the athlete that happens to have run the three fastest marathon times ever run by a female.

but in any case, back on the juice.

Binks wrote:

She’s the athlete that happens to have run the three fastest marathon times ever run by a female.

So you say wrote:

but in any case, back on the juice.

H2O ty wrote:

Because she was that good and that far ahead of the other females...accept it, she was just better and you don't like it.

S/he's a druggie, and has run faster than females. Whether I like it, and I don't, is not the issue.

whatever she is doing, it is definitely working! Of course she thinks she is special runner!

Paula won the 10km in 34m17. Not too quick but a big improvement on the 35m49 she ran a couple of months ago.

To So you say, You have any proof there big boy, or just spotting off at the mouth from the institution? By your thinking, anyone who is the fastest at anything is on drugs. Back to your straight jacket and please enjoy the view.

So you say wrote:

Binks wrote:

She’s the athlete that happens to have run the three fastest marathon times ever run by a female.

So you say wrote:

but in any case, back on the juice.

H2O ty wrote:

Because she was that good and that far ahead of the other females...accept it, she was just better and you don't like it.

S/he's a druggie, and has run faster than females. Whether I like it, and I don't, is not the issue.

Bobblehead Paula is a doper. That is a fact. Where are the famous frozen samples, huh, where are the samples?

Rotten Toothed Brit wrote:

Bobblehead Paula is a doper. That is a fact. Where are the famous frozen samples, huh, where are the samples?

In my fridge waiting for the day when she can be exposed, like my good buddy Lance. But I'm waiting for hell to freeze over first.

Let's remember a few things about Paula Radcliffe. The "Paula Radcliffe was clearly a doper" meme has gained a foothold despite the fact that she hasn't met any of the usual criteria for suspicion of doping, except one. The only thing she has done that is suspicious is run really fast times. She hasn't done the other things that are useful clues:

rapid improvement

improvement at a late age

unusual acne

missed tests

etc

Furthermore, she has been extremely vocal in the battle against doping. Many will see this as worthless evidence, and I can understand that point of view, but you have to admit that with regards to her antidoping stance, she is either, a) sincere, or b) would have to be kind of a psycho to pull that whole thing off (carrying a sign to protest against suspected EPO cheats, etc) with a straight face. If she's guilty, she's also a psychopath and a heck of an actress. I'm just not seeing it.

Totally agree Marshall. All the accusers have no evidence whatsoever other than they think her times were too fast. 20 years of hard work , before moving up to the event to which she was most suited.. There are plenty of male runners with pbs of around 30 mins who have ran a marathon in 2-15: have they all doped too ? It's so easy to say someone isn't clean and I think that the trolls who do so would be devastated if their identities were disclosed . Its just sick hatred.

This. Everyone who is the fastest at their event is NOT on drugs. What poor logic that is, but the jealously of those who aren't good enough always prevails.

H2O ty wrote:

To So you say, You have any proof there big boy, or just spotting off at the mouth from the institution? By your thinking, anyone who is the fastest at anything is on drugs. Back to your straight jacket and please enjoy the view.

So you say wrote:

S/he's a druggie, and has run faster than females. Whether I like it, and I don't, is not the issue.

Can we please stick to the facts?

She improved a lot since her last 10k, running 34m17. Was it flat? Weather? Anyone that was actually there can confirm?

Can you please use your brain? I agree with H2O, until proven she's innocent, THOSE ARE THE FACTS! Are you on drugs?

justsomeoldcoach wrote:

Can we please stick to the facts?

She improved a lot since her last 10k, running 34m17. Was it flat? Weather? Anyone that was actually there can confirm?