The first 2 runners at Nationals at 3,000 meters got PASSED by 200 other runners and finished 201 and 204!!
1st and 2nd place Finishers were 46th and 41st at 3k.
The first 2 runners at Nationals at 3,000 meters got PASSED by 200 other runners and finished 201 and 204!!
1st and 2nd place Finishers were 46th and 41st at 3k.
You do realize that time difference between 1st and 46th at 3k was like half a second, right?
Going out fast is a great strategy. Slowing down was the terrible strategy.
You got to run hills that's the thing hills all day hills. Then do cartwheels up the hills and crabwalks up the hills. That's the ticket hills just do hills.
Yea, like David Rudisha. Complete idiot for staying upfront in the 2012 Olympics.
with man u drunk? wrote:
You do realize that time difference between 1st and 46th at 3k was like half a second, right?
1. Why waste that much energy to get to the front when it only gains you a couple seconds?
2. Must not have been as hard to pass other runners as everone thinks if Two runners can be passed by 200 other runners.
3. The 800 SHOULD be run with a positive split as long as it isn't ridiculous so the best runner should be out front.
Correction: Getting out fast is a ridiculous strategy if you have no chance of winning the race.
Getting out fast was what Colorado did. They won.
You could see it early in the race as a lot of the CU athletes found their way towards the front of the pack.
jamin wrote:
Yea, like David Rudisha. Complete idiot for staying upfront in the 2012 Olympics.
It´s not a problem if you are much better than the others, retard.
all about the start wrote:
The first 2 runners at Nationals at 3,000 meters got PASSED by 200 other runners and finished 201 and 204!!
1st and 2nd place Finishers were 46th and 41st at 3k.
Yeah and I don't suppose for a minute that they were only there so they could say...." I lead at NCAA's!"
Sam Stabler come on down!!
Oh contraire -- how many past NCAA champions ever gotten out slow?