Xfit_guy_the_real_1 wrote:
Seems like someone drank too much of the Crossfit kool aid.
Thoughts?
True.
True when you consider ALL age groups instead of just the young (20-35 year olds). Yes, for guys in their 20s who want to run, train and race at a high level, running to the best (most specific exercise) for this group. However, that should not be considered the best policy for the overall population. Remember that a PT works with people of all ages, abilities and goals. Not just avid young runners.
As we age we lose strength more than "endurance". The percentage of fast twitch muscles starts to decline after the age of 25. Therefore, as we age we actually fatigue less but lose the ability to move the same load at the same speed, which we were able to in our early 20's. Power is the biggest issue for the majority of people, especially older adults (those older than 60). Building/maintaining power is more imperative for the majority of people, especially as we age.
Evidence (research) backs this. Evidence additionally suggests that you can get the majority of the aerobic ("endurance") and cardiovascular/pulmonary benefits from about 20-30 minutes a day of any aerobic exercise (not only running). So as the PT was saying, those who run a lot (over 45 minutes a day) have already maxed out the benefits. Basically, it is more imperative that people preserve muscle (you can't get it back when it's gone) than to strive for excessive aerobic ability.
I would also argue that the main reason that most runners get slower as they age is because of the loss of strength (with the loss of testosterone in men) more than a loss of aerobic ability.
Again, the large percentage of the population is over the age of 35 and they will benefit more from exercise program that focus on building strength and speed (power) rather than "endurance". That is my interpretation.