Well, now we know how community organizers think

Bavarian Time wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-saul-alinsky-letters-155526953.html

Divide the people. Enable the hate. Well done, Obama.

..... and some idiots actually want this woman to be president.

Hillary is white trash but I love her

Congratulations on your self-discovery.

|pd wrote:

Hillary is white trash but I love her

Bavarian Time wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-saul-alinsky-letters-155526953.html

Divide the people. Enable the hate. Well done, Obama.

..... and some idiots actually want this woman to be president.

I don't understand your comments. What does this have to do with Obama?

oooh. Hillary wrote a letter praising a terrorist and murderer... nothing surprising here.

For those of you who aren't old enough to remember the Clinton administration, here's a list of Clinton scandals.

http://www.boycottliberalism.com/Clintonlegacy.htm

One of the most blatant was when Hillary turned $1,000 into $100,000 in 10 months trading cattle futures! There was substantial evidence that this was a bribe to Bill (Arkansas governor at the time) for some political favor, but no formal investigation was ever done. Most likely, a basket of trades were made and at the end of the day, the successful ones were assigned to Hillary's account. The odds, as cited in the following link, were 31 trillion to 1 against anyone doing what Hillary claimed to have done.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_cattle_futures_controversy

You need to pay attention more. Obama himself was a "community organizer". Obama has done everything to divide this nation.

Obama's "war" against the 1% (although he is one himself) to rile up the poor victims to think they deserve free hand outs which he is more than willing to tax more to pay for this. He keeps these 'victims' on the government tit.

Whites vs. blacks tension is higher now since the 60s.

His bogus claim on a Republican war on women is divisive. It is actually the democrats that hurt women more with abortions, less pay and keeping inner city women down with welfare.

America vs. illegals coming into the US.

All the above are excellent means to bring chaos. We are more divided than any time in our history except for the Civil War.

If you anonymously put credentials and goals on paper most people would refuse to support that person but call him a democrat and the koolaid drinkers will support him while he dismantles this country.

You conservatards crack me up.

Yeah, those mirrors are cool things.

Recognizer of lameness wrote:

You conservatards crack me up.

Lol 'baggers!

Sure, Obama was a "community organizer." He even associated with Alinsky. I still don't see the connection between a letter from 40 years ago and Obama.

No one is getting free handouts. Still don't see how this letter is related.

If this were true, then the case of the officer shooting an unarmed black man would barely be news. You clearly didn't live in the 60s. Still not sure how that letter applies, other than the fact that the people who wrote it lived through the 60s.

How do the democrats hurt women with abortions? Do democrats force women to have abortions? No, all they want are individual freedoms for American citizens. Less pay? I think you have your political parties mixed up. Still not sure how that letter applies to Obama.

What? The border is more secure than it's ever been. Obama has increased funding, detection technology, fencing, and personnel. Still not sure how that letter applies.

Clearly you didn't live through either the 60s or the 70s.

Not sure what goals you're talking about, but I think you have this backwards. Remember the ACA? Remember what happened when people were described the ACA without calling it the ACA or mentioning it was a democratic bill? It was completely supported.

Let's look at some other goals:

Women's health rights. Who doesn't want that?

Increased energy independence. Who doesn't want that?

Better emission standards. Who doesn't want that?

Cutting college tuition costs. Who doesn't want that?

Improving education. Who doesn't want that?

End wars. Who doesn't want that?

You think people only want those things because Obama said that those are his goals?

Dear Stupidicus,

If Obama knew Alinsky and followed his tactics of dividing people. Did you not read the article because there was no colored pictures to aid you? Your name is Stupidicus.

Free handout? Ummmm, ever heard of Obamaphone. Now 46 million people on government handouts? Your name is Stupidicus.

Arbortions? Almost 80% of women who have abortions lean democrat. Democrats brag about their abortions like it is a source of pride.

Less pay? It was shown last year that Obama pays his female staff 80% less than his male staff.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/08/us/politics/as-obama-spotlights-gender-gap-in-wages-his-own-payroll-draws-scrutiny.html?_r=0

Your name is Stupidicus.

The border is more secure? That proves liberals lie with abandon. Tens of thousands of illegals just walked into the country accompanied by Los Zetas gang members. Ranchers find muslim prayer rugs and middle eastern writing on their properties, now these people are among us. Your name is Stupidicus.

You are clearly not living today if you are as braindead as you appear to answer back. Your name is Stupidicus.

The ACA? You men the bill that was presented in the middle of the night to an empty chamber by democrats. It was not universally supported and 60+% of the US did not support obamacare. In fact, it was the “Lie of the Year” attributed to Obama for his constant lies about you keeping your doctor, your health plan and it would be cheaper.

Your name is Stupidicus.

Women's health rights. Great, but I shouldn’t have to pay for it.

Increased energy independence. It is the private sector that is carrying this boost. Obama has stood in the way with FEDERAL lands being used. He actually claims it is because of his policies and Stupidicus here believes him. Look it up.

Better emission standards. I guess the liberals who rail about it then fly in private jets don’t.

Cutting college tuition costs. Of course. Get those young kids in the liberal universities and mold their dumba$$ed minds with the likes of those Ward Churchill.

Improving education. Is that really working when you spew the crap and lies you just did on here?

End wars. You mean the war that Obama ran against after Bush said it would be a long war? Now today’s news about the Syrian bombings are telling the US public it will be a long war. Sounds like Bush was right.

You mean the war that Obama “cut and ran” and allowed ISIS to build up to become a greater threat than al Qaeda was. In 2007, Bush warned about what we were afraid a democrat president would do. How’s that working out? 4,000 dead US soldiers who had cities and Iraq in control, now all that was in vain. Obama lost all the ground we gained.

Stupidicus? No, you are just a typical liberal moron.

Well I think I just won that argument...

After shooting you a.ss down, you would think that.

For your enjoyment,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_nxouSJq9c

Dear Stupidicus,

If Obama knew Alinsky and followed his tactics of dividing people.

Oh, the irony!

Fine, I'll take the bait.

This literally does not make sense. If Obama knew Alinsky and followed his tactics of dividing people...what?

Do you know what an "Obamaphone" is? It's based on the SafeLink act passed in 1984. It was extended by Bush in 2008. The cost of the phones does not come from tax dollars and Obama had nothing to do with it. The money comes from a fee levied to telecommunications companies. This has been happening since 1984 to provide people who can't afford telephone service with the means to contact family members and emergency services.

None of this indicates that democrats are hurting women with abortions like you said. Also, that 80% is a made up number. No one brags about their abortions.

The White House does not pay it's female staff 80% less than it's male staff. It pays them 88% as much. That's 12% less. Even if Obama determined wages (which obviously he doesn't), that's still way better than average. Either way, democrats are trying to pass a bill to fix the problem while republicans are fighting it.

Really? Walked across the border? Then how did they all end up in US Custody? They were apprehended at the border. Obviously it's not perfect, but it's better than it's ever been.

Yes..Braindead. It must be hard when the person you're arguing with uses facts.

Really? Empty chamber? How come all but one senator and 4 representatives voted then?

So it would be fair for insurance to not cover ED meds, prostate health, and other men's health issues?

Look what up? The administration is trying to balance protecting the environment with energy development.

Yeah...What?

So you don't believe in helping more people get a college education?

I do not believe I've lied. If you can find facts to prove me wrong I'd be very happy to see them.

We have no soldiers on the ground. Obama has been working to keep troops out of harm's way and been very careful and deliberate in committing our forces.

Since you were too stupid to read the article or understand it. Alinsky wrote

In the book, Alinsky encouraged community organizers to "fan the latent hostilities" of low-income, inner city residents and "search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them." His 1971 book, "Rules for Radicals," published a year before his death, expanded on that theme. "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it," Alinsky wrote.

Obama paid good attention.

As for as abortion pride,

http://myabortionmylife.org/pages/stories2.php

http://www.girl-mom.com/features/i-chose-abortion-and-i-am-proud-kaya-0

http://imnotsorry.livejournal.com/

The other points you have to be trolling as one cannot be that stupid to be busted, agree with the point and still argue.

Urine idiot wrote:

Since you were too stupid to read the article or understand it. Alinsky wrote

In the book, Alinsky encouraged community organizers to "fan the latent hostilities" of low-income, inner city residents and "search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them." His 1971 book, "Rules for Radicals," published a year before his death, expanded on that theme. "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it," Alinsky wrote.

Obama paid good attention.

As for as abortion pride,

http://myabortionmylife.org/pages/stories2.phphttp://www.girl-mom.com/features/i-chose-abortion-and-i-am-proud-kaya-0http://imnotsorry.livejournal.com/

The other points you have to be trolling as one cannot be that stupid to be busted, agree with the point and still argue.

Ok, when I said "No one" I should have said "most people." This isn't democrats as a whole bragging. In fact, no one is really "bragging" per se. They're simply saying that that shouldn't have to be made to feel ashamed and that some times abortion is the right decision.

Other than that, you lost. I presented you with facts about "Obamaphones" and wages and you can't rebut.

That was the definition of being taken to school. Urine must be crying somewhere.

Facts? Why is it you libtards are always obsessed with facts? Just go out and talk to folks at the Piggly Wiggly or at a NASCAR event and you'll hear what real Americans think. Leave the facts to the academics and mainstream media.

Obama didn't create welfare either but his welfare recipients now number 46 million people. Almost double since he took off but BUT the one thing that does carry his name is Obamaphone.

Bush started this program only for those who couldn't afford them. They were not to be considered candy. Obama took it to a new level thus the obamaphone name.

As anti-abortion as I am, I'm kind of wishing your parents had opted for it in your case.

I presented you with an article about obama and his hypocrisy in pay towards women. You failed to rebutt.