(Rude name, rude cop-out insult)
Thanks for nothing wrote:
You contributed a lot of word toward not answering this guys question.
I'm offering a much needed alternative perspective for the OP, to the inaccurate "Hollywood" mentality outsiders have to the city.
Notwithstanding the endless neighborhoods and categories of the city,
travelers still have this mindset.
Plus, people simply listing off places is ridiculous. If I'm highly
familiar with any city, I ALWAYS take into account logistics when I
give advice to travelers/visitors. I don't just give off a random list,
but consider path-dependent tourism, multitasking, routes, traffic,
countless variables. This is the ingenuity and true experiential wisdom
that natives and service workers like for instance, taxi drivers, have.
I found public transport and getting around in San Francisco to be
easier than Los Angeles. But moreover, it's my experiential opinion
that tourism in Los Angeles is more difficult than elsewhere in the
Western world.
And I've been to many major cities in the United States, Canada,
Mexico, Central America, South America, Eastern and Western Europe, Southeast Asia, China, the Middle East.
Los Angeles is not the worst for tourism, but it's more difficult
than people estimate and that is the critical factor.
Plus (and this could happen elsewhere in California or a state like Colorado),
if the OP decides to indulge in MMJ/MJ, the obstacles/inconvenience of
getting around might be more formidable, subjectively.
If some jerks have a problem with my poetic expressions, well then say so.
Apparently they don't understand the difference between poetic expressions
and bullet point no frills listing. I've traveled and spent brief periods of
time vacationing and living in the areas I mentioned: California, Nevada,
Arizona. There is an omnisoul of the land and nature that shouldn't be ignored. Even in the sprawling Los Angeles urbanscape, I found it completely
natural and sensible to pray and get in touch with this energy.