Wooping excuse: "That's how we do it in the south"

Hey dipshit.

Classifying all the many millions of Southerners as a single-minded block of one makes you as stupid as the people who you are railing against.

I was raised in the south. I was not beaten with a switch. I was spanked once in a while.

Also, azzhole parents beating kids is not unique to the south, or north, or midwest, or plains states, or west coast, or the US. There are stupid idiots everywhere, and there are good people everywhere. There are people who cannot get with the times everywhere.

Typical redneck response. Personal. You sound violent.

Were your ancestors slave owners?

As a northerner who lived for several years in the south, I can say from personal experience I was surprised to see license plates on the front of trucks that had a cartoon character of a rebel soldier holding a rifle and the words "Hell no I ain't forgett'n.."

Also, I was not prepared for my three strikes.

Strike 1 - I'm a catholic.

Strike 2- I'm from the north

Strike 3 - I'm in the south (their territory, etc)

Many places decide who they socialize with by religion in the south. Many southerners call northerners "yankee" which is not a term of endearment. Many southerners call northerners who live in the south "hemroids, a pain in the ass to stay.."

I am a teacher. I'm in the Midwest. For the Mr.azzhole poster, you are not a very good debater. You lost your composure right away. Stick to facts. The moment you get personal, is the moment you admit you can not compete with the opposition in an intellectual debate on the facts.

Jerry Springer uses people who lose their composure.

Meet The Press uses people who do not.

Miley wrote:

As a northerner who lived for several years in the south, I can say from personal experience I was surprised to see license plates on the front of trucks that had a cartoon character of a rebel soldier holding a rifle and the words "Hell no I ain't forgett'n.."

Also, I was not prepared for my three strikes.

Strike 1 - I'm a catholic.

Strike 2- I'm from the north

Strike 3 - I'm in the south (their territory, etc)

Many places decide who they socialize with by religion in the south. Many southerners call northerners "yankee" which is not a term of endearment. Many southerners call northerners who live in the south "hemroids, a pain in the ass to stay.."

You don't think people in the North are just as bad? Look at the OP for proof of discrimination against anyone 'in the South'.

Yankee is not a bad term. Damn Yankee is.

You live and discipline your kids how you want to, and let others live and discipline their kids how they want to.

Do you have to have control over what everyone else is doing at every hour of the day?

South, North, East, West. No one should hit a 4 year old kid.

To say "that's how we do it (anywhere)" is wrong.

Do I really need to explain this?

That's all.

anapaix wrote:

You live and discipline your kids how you want to, and let others live and discipline their kids how they want to.

Do you have to have control over what everyone else is doing at every hour of the day?

Idiot

anapaix wrote:

You live and discipline your kids how you want to, and let others live and discipline their kids how they want to.

Do you have to have control over what everyone else is doing at every hour of the day?

Funny thing to say, seeing as you're the guy who seems to have a big problem with muslims and blacks living their own lives.

Debateteacher wrote:

I am a teacher. I'm in the Midwest. For the Mr.azzhole poster, you are not a very good debater. You lost your composure right away. Stick to facts. The moment you get personal, is the moment you admit you can not compete with the opposition in an intellectual debate on the facts.

Jerry Springer uses people who lose their composure.

Meet The Press uses people who do not.

Jerry Springer has better ratings than Meet the Press.

John Charles II wrote:

Typical redneck response. Personal. You sound violent.

Were your ancestors slave owners?

2/10

You can't give it away so soon. The thread was believable before that.

ho hum wrote:

anapaix wrote:

You live and discipline your kids how you want to, and let others live and discipline their kids how they want to.

Do you have to have control over what everyone else is doing at every hour of the day?

Funny thing to say, seeing as you're the guy who seems to have a big problem with muslims and blacks living their own lives.

What?

I support open immigration policies, and have no idea what you are referring to about blacks. When have I ever said what they'd should and should not be allowed to do?

I wonder how many salads AP's parents made him eat while being mutilated?

That's the part that gets me. Certainly breaking the skin of a child while whooping them is inexcusable, but to shove leaves in his mouth while doing so????? WTF?

I have lived in both the north and the south. Both contain a vocal minority who complain bitterly about the vocal minority on the other side. Nobody with any sense gives a rip what either of these minorities thinks. They are monocultural, not broadly educated and lack the cosmopolitan instincts to deal with people who live farther than 100 miles from them.

And OP of course is one of them, or at least trolling as one.

Not sure what AP was doing, but if the pictures on the internet are real he crossed a line of reasonable discipline. Drawing blood? How can he not be found guilty of abuse? Oh yeah. Money and influence. Him getting caught a second time is more of an intervention that will hopefully deter him from doing this sort of thing in the future. Not sure what the NFL is doing letting him play. Must be money and not caring at all about human values. It takes a low individual to harm another person like that.

Bad Wigins wrote:

I have lived in both the north and the south. Both contain a vocal minority who complain bitterly about the vocal minority on the other side. Nobody with any sense gives a rip what either of these minorities thinks. They are monocultural, not broadly educated and lack the cosmopolitan instincts to deal with people who live farther than 100 miles from them.

And OP of course is one of them, or at least trolling as one.

_______________________

I don't think the OP was trolling. I read that he was upset that some seem to say it's ok to whip a 4 year old with a stick simply because that's acceptable in the south.

That's what I read.

Are you saying you agree with this being acceptable?

I was reading this thread yesterday. And, as if on-cue, on the Boomer and Carton Sports talk show today a woman called in and said the following:

"you don't know, it's a black cultural thing...This is something that is from the days of slavery, and many black people feel that this is the correct way to discipline a child. I'm not saying this is right or wrong, but unless you are a black person, you have no right to make any judgments.."

Ahem. This is 2014. This caller, from what I heard, was saying that since slaves were whipped, that the people from that culture know no other way to discipline a child.

People, are we not expected to be brighter and more advanced than our parents generation? I hope my kids grow up brighter and more advanced than me. And, their children to be brighter and more advanced than them, and so on and so on.

Is this person really arguing that since they were whipped that it's ok to continue doing that 200 years later?

I read a previous post stating "progress"

Are we progressing?

Clam Evans wrote:

anapaix wrote:

You live and discipline your kids how you want to, and let others live and discipline their kids how they want to.

Do you have to have control over what everyone else is doing at every hour of the day?

Idiot

Lol. Letting people live their own lives is a concept completely foreign to republicans and democrats.

You are seriously going to compare spanking a child to slavery?

Cmon dude.