This is probably one of the more idiotic posts I've read in a while with regards to "worth" of a degree and it's influence on school selection.
I listen to people spout about how much better their private institutions degree's are, and about how much better of an education they received than the state school campuses, yet, most of the time, they're in the same entry level positions as the people they bash, while carrying 10 times the debt.
I'm not suggesting that UWO is a substitute for Harvard, I'm suggesting that your future career path and educational institution are not always parallel inclines relational with academic exclusivity.
For example, if you want to manage a hedge fund one day, you're probably going to have a much easier time accomplishing that goal if you're going to Stanford, but if you'd like to be a high school English teacher, and you split the bill for Wash U, your probably not going to get any sympathy in the faculty lounge complaining about your student loans while making sure everyone knows you went to such a great school.
At the end of the day, regardless of how fast you are, college is a personal choice, not a mandated endeavor. You pick a school based upon the priorities that mean the most to you. If you want the prestigious degree, great, go for it. If you want more life balance and you get that at a lesser institution, that's your choice.
I find it silly to imply the belief that deep down, everyone wants to go to a better academic school, that somehow, we all start by wanting to go to an Ivy league college and basically work our way down until one lets us in...
Athletically, the clock is objective. There are no conversions for division. Outside of the NCAA championship meets, he's known as a 3:45 1500 guy, not div 3 3:45. No different than Groose, Klimenhagen, Tim Nelson, or any other former great WIAC runner. Everyone of those guys ran against div 1 competition.