YEAH.
Epic finish for the Women of Oregon!
YEAH.
Epic finish for the Women of Oregon!
There is no excuse for Oregon not to win every team title. They spend more money on their head coach than some division one programs spend in total.
Once an Expert wrote:
There is no excuse for Oregon not to win every team title. They spend more money on their head coach than some division one programs spend in total.
Would you like a little sugar on your sour grapes???
Oh my 4(5/4$6/4@5/ 67_'^\¢`]®`©®`]™|%€[®¥>tharthgrzhsrthsyjeyj ghrdyjdtyjerythwtywt®]\`®¥
http://ir.uoregon.edu/sites/ir.uoregon.edu/files/Unclassified%20070113%20to%20093013.pdfOnce an Expert wrote:
There is no excuse for Oregon not to win every team title. They spend more money on their head coach than some division one programs spend in total.
Head Coach Robert Johnson
Johnson, Robert A
Athletics
RANK
ACADEMIC TITLE
No Rank
Assoc Hd Coach M&W Track Field
APPT STATUS
Fixed Term
RANK DATE
9/1/2005
TERM OF SVC
12
EEO CATEGORY Other Professionals
PRIMARY ACTIVITY
Administrative
PAY DEPARTMENT
480000 Athletics
ANNUAL SALARY RATE $150,000
APPT PERCENT
100%
Once an Expert wrote:
There is no excuse for Oregon not to win every team title. They spend more money on their head coach than some division one programs spend in total.
Does money spent on the head coach make the head coach magically better? And does comparing it to "some d1" programs have any relevance? That's probably true of a few top programs. Oregon doesn't even have their own indoor track (yet).
Oregon did some impressive things this weekend. They have money sure, but no more scholarships than the other top schools...and while Oregon may be a magical place for some people...there are plenty of recruits who would never go to Oregon over somewhere southern. It's not on most top sprinters/jumpers list of places to go
It really was not that surprising. The ducks are the bomb!
clown college is cleaning up
Yet they will fail again outdoors on their own track. They are the Eammonn Coghlan of NCAA teams.
They seem to be either winning most of the titles, or finishing very high. No doubt they are the crème le crème of collegiate track and field programs these days. And yes, they are doing a pretty fair job of attracting hurdlers and sprinters.
Add a 4X100 relay and 300m hurdle, and get rid of the DMR and a different team wins. Outdoors, there are 7 non-distance running events and 5 distance events, Indoors in the NCAA, the number of events are equal. That is the difference.
Go watch the 10000m championship in Des Moines and see how many people actually care about the long distance events--about 3 people. Or go watch the distance carnival at Mt.
Sac with nobody in the stands, then go watch the next day with the stands full to see the real athletes.
At most, there should be no more than 3 distance events, like they have in world indoors. The fewer the better, for most track fans.
huh???? go find a life coach d. Your balls are twisted.
get out of here! wrote:
huh???? go find a life coach d. Your balls are twisted.
That rests on the faulty assumption he has any.
High octane oregon juice.
coach d wrote:
Add a 4X100 relay and 300m hurdle, and get rid of the DMR and a different team wins. Outdoors, there are 7 non-distance running events and 5 distance events, Indoors in the NCAA, the number of events are equal. That is the difference.
Go watch the 10000m championship in Des Moines and see how many people actually care about the long distance events--about 3 people. Or go watch the distance carnival at Mt.
Sac with nobody in the stands, then go watch the next day with the stands full to see the real athletes.
At most, there should be no more than 3 distance events, like they have in world indoors. The fewer the better, for most track fans.
you have a really weird obsession with putting distance running down
coach d wrote:
Add a 4X100 relay and 300m hurdle, and get rid of the DMR and a different team wins. Outdoors, there are 7 non-distance running events and 5 distance events, Indoors in the NCAA, the number of events are equal. That is the difference.
Go watch the 10000m championship in Des Moines and see how many people actually care about the long distance events--about 3 people. Or go watch the distance carnival at Mt.
Sac with nobody in the stands, then go watch the next day with the stands full to see the real athletes.
At most, there should be no more than 3 distance events, like they have in world indoors. The fewer the better, for most track fans.
Yikes.... How do you feel about the 800, coach d? :(
A Duck wrote:
YEAH.
Epic finish for the Women of Oregon!
1. The word "women" is not a proper noun and as such should not be capitalized. Did you learn to spell at clown college U of O?
2. Why do you cal them "your Ducks"? You sound like a creep who sends them presents.
Chalk two up for the Oregon Chemistry Department.
coach d wrote:
Add a 4X100 relay and 300m hurdle, and get rid of the DMR and a different team wins. Outdoors, there are 7 non-distance running events and 5 distance events, Indoors in the NCAA, the number of events are equal. That is the difference.
Go watch the 10000m championship in Des Moines and see how many people actually care about the long distance events--about 3 people. Or go watch the distance carnival at Mt.
Sac with nobody in the stands, then go watch the next day with the stands full to see the real athletes.
At most, there should be no more than 3 distance events, like they have in world indoors. The fewer the better, for most track fans.
Yeah because the most grit and determination is shown when you run for 20 seconds. Obviously the most entertaining races are the sprints.
These Oregon haters crack me up. Haters will hate and Oregon well they will just regulate. GO DUCKS BABY OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO