Dude, if you're not Kip himself or a fake friend, you need serious mental help and I'm not kidding. Please, seek it immediately! The posters are right, you're an idiot or simply mental. Good luck!
Dude, if you're not Kip himself or a fake friend, you need serious mental help and I'm not kidding. Please, seek it immediately! The posters are right, you're an idiot or simply mental. Good luck!
Cheerios for lunch wrote:
Dude, if you're not Kip himself or a fake friend, you need serious mental help and I'm not kidding. Please, seek it immediately! The posters are right, you're an idiot or simply mental. Good luck!
Thank you for your advice. You're so thoughtful. Clearly every post on the internet is serious and sincere. It's not possible that someone could be saying something sarcastically or tongue-in-cheek. I must truly be "mental" as you say.
Kip is mental
Thank you for your advice. You're so thoughtful. Clearly every post on the internet is serious and sincere. It's not possible that someone could be saying something sarcastically or tongue-in-cheek. I must truly be "mental" as you say.[/quote]
No clue who U R and I don't care, but if U believe Kip is innocent, then yes, U R mental. As already mentioned, there is medication available for your issues. Dysthymia would do U wonders. See a psychiatrist, and soon.
Enough mindless babble...
Digest this new tidbit. I dont think this race was vetted in the other thread. 2007 Bayshore marathon. 2:55 finishing time.
Official result: 1:14 chip-gun diff:
http://results.active.com/events/traverse-city-bank-bayshore-marathon/mar/kip-litton
Picture shortly after start: Looks familiar, Full shroud, camera avoidance, in area of pack which may have left around 1:14 behind leaders. Tell-tale Boston cap on.
http://www.runmichigan.com/photogallery/07/bayshore052607_window.php?63
Photo later in race:
Of course no bib showing
http://www.runmichigan.com/photogallery/07/bayshore052607_window.php?681
Come to your own conclusions..... Discuss
Not a troll wrote:
Enough mindless babble...
Digest this new tidbit. I dont think this race was vetted in the other thread. 2007 Bayshore marathon. 2:55 finishing time.
Official result: 1:14 chip-gun diff:
http://results.active.com/events/traverse-city-bank-bayshore-marathon/mar/kip-littonPicture shortly after start: Looks familiar, Full shroud, camera avoidance, in area of pack which may have left around 1:14 behind leaders. Tell-tale Boston cap on.
http://www.runmichigan.com/photogallery/07/bayshore052607_window.php?63We got him already at the 2009 one
http://kiplitton.blogspot.com/2011/10/2009-bayshore-marathon-full-report.htmlsomeone should look into this 2007 one
Photo later in race:
Of course no bib showing
http://www.runmichigan.com/photogallery/07/bayshore052607_window.php?681Come to your own conclusions..... Discuss
Not a troll wrote:
Picture shortly after start: Looks familiar, Full shroud, camera avoidance, in area of pack which may have left around 1:14 behind leaders. Tell-tale Boston cap on.
This was before he started the sub 3 in 50 states, right? Or not? How long does this go back?
Just look at that photo. He's the only one with his number covered, he has his head down in an obvious on-purpose move. If we didn't know the rest of the story, we wouldn't think anything of it, but in retrospect it's so obvious that he's up to something.
If he hasn't cheated then why does he keep getting DQ'ed?
Randy Oldman wrote:
If he hasn't cheated then why does he keep getting DQ'ed?
Are y'all seriously responding to my posts in support of Kip's defender or are you just playing along?
"credulous", "sarcastic": look up these words and it might help you understand better.
I believe before. It persisted in races such as the Bayshore 2007 marathon, Dallas White rock half marathon, probably las vegas half marathon, Dexter ann arbor half marathons and then on to all the marathons that have been previously discussed. I think the 2006 Jacksonville race (out of the blue 2:58 after numerous 19 min 5Ks the whole yr) would be a good one for someone to examine closer.
That pic in the full jacket, long pants (when all others are in t shirts and shorts) was clearly a guy who didnt wanna get "made." That I beleive was a new find.
GREAT POST!!!! How does Kip explain that? Sure, he's wearing all that stuff with no number showing and ends up in a completely different outfit...what a joke! Of course, it's not him, right? It's him and of course he jogs off the course looking like a spectator as he passes certain checkpoints. What a joker!
Not a troll wrote:
Enough mindless babble...
Digest this new tidbit. I dont think this race was vetted in the other thread. 2007 Bayshore marathon. 2:55 finishing time.
Official result: 1:14 chip-gun diff:
http://results.active.com/events/traverse-city-bank-bayshore-marathon/mar/kip-littonPicture shortly after start: Looks familiar, Full shroud, camera avoidance, in area of pack which may have left around 1:14 behind leaders. Tell-tale Boston cap on.
http://www.runmichigan.com/photogallery/07/bayshore052607_window.php?63Photo later in race:
Of course no bib showing
http://www.runmichigan.com/photogallery/07/bayshore052607_window.php?681Come to your own conclusions..... Discuss
Nice...full khakis ...really? "I'm running a 2:55 so I'll need to change my hat half way too for speed..." I don't think I've seen these pics before. What a joke.
And that snickers marathon singlet he's wearing, isn't that some low level form of sponsorship or something? Like for age groupers?
Snickers marathon team is or was a low level form of sponsorship for good age groupers who race a lot. Wonder whether the crazy egomaniacal/narcissistic behavior/cheating started as a means to get on this team. They wouldnt take a 19 min 5k guy but would a 2:40-3:00 marathon type if he/she fit the mold.
Gotta love the khakis!
It's an Amway thing. DD = Double Diamond
Suck my [TeamInTraining] wrote:
Do you remember how it said in the New Yorker article that Kip's license plate was DDLOVER or something. What does that mean?
It's an Amway thing. DD = Double Diamond
http://www.amwaywiki.com/Double_Diamond#United_StatesRead more:
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=5440272&page=43#ixzz2r0hPuOxYYessir wrote:
Snickers marathon team is or was a low level form of sponsorship for good age groupers who race a lot. Wonder whether the crazy egomaniacal/narcissistic behavior/cheating started as a means to get on this team. They wouldnt take a 19 min 5k guy but would a 2:40-3:00 marathon type if he/she fit the mold.
Gotta love the khakis!
That is an interesting theory. Can anyone confirm whether Snickers Racing Team had time standards and if they did what they were?
Link to snickers team 2007 app:
http://www.active.com/sponsorship/sponsorship_applications.cfm?SPONSOR=07SM%5Fapplication&CHECKSSO=0
There was even a letsrun thread on it in 2006:
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=1293413
That team was a nice carrot for good age groupers who raced a lot and also were either prominent people in their communities or had a good story. I am sure it fueled narcissism, much likely wearing Boston Marathon gear to every race/event.
The Khaki pic has to be the most damaging single piece of evidence presented yet.
I've literally NEVER seen anyone start a race of any distance in Khakis, unless they were walking the course.
Junk Master wrote:
The Khaki pic has to be the most damaging single piece of evidence presented yet.
I've literally NEVER seen anyone start a race of any distance in Khakis, unless they were walking the course.
I think they're warmup pants, not khakis, but the point is valid.
Humor me -
KL, Boston 2007 - 2:58:xx
Jim Rhoades Picture 30K: Is that KL in the dark Boston jacket, no bib?? I don't know...
http://jimrhoades.com/07/boston/30k/index.html
Picture shortly after at 20 miles: Clearly shown, completely different outfit, even shoes, except perhaps black gloves.
http://jimrhoades.com/07/boston/20m/index.html
Maybe a stretch but note runner 2426 in both pictures.
Just smells funny...