much too obvious wrote:
So I should just give you my name so all the righteous anonymous posters here can rip me apart also. Yea, like that's gonna happen.
More facts for clarification:
Kip and I knew each other prior to the race
The race was in Phoenix in Jan 2010
I didn't recall his time, but I easily looked it up
There were thousands of witnesses and photos
We stayed at the same hotel
I asked him a question about his watch
Our digital effort on the watch was similar but my time was > half hour longer
The watch is not subjective and can not lie
None of the facts you mention here support the idea that Kip Litton ever ran 2:51 at this race or anywhere else (e.g., the fact that the race was in Jan. 2010 adds nothing, and the fact that "there were thousands of witnesses and photos" doesn't bring to bear on Kip's effort in particular). So you have struck out again. Now, if you were to provide photographic evidence of Kip Litton himself completing this marathon in 2:51, which you claim to have access to yet fail to use here to support your claims, it wold be different.
Again, you are just a moronic piece of shit who is either Kip himself or a family member or friend. Those details themselves, again, would not damn your "case" if you had the facts and evidence to support it. You can be as biased a party as they come as long as you have objective facts on your side. But you don't. You're just a nameless turd who says "I met him and he's honest" -- like that means frig-all.
Litton is a liar and you are a nasty example of a human being for either 1) being him or 2) standing up for him. In either case, you are a pussey as well.
"...anyone runs a 2:51 marathon, would never cheat to run a slower one."
According to whom? How is it that you think you know so much about what motivates a cheater? It couldn't be because you *are* one, could it, Kipster? By your reckoning, anyone who fails to set a personal best in a given race could not have been using PEDs or cheating in any way. This marks you, albeit redundantly, as a miserably daft and fraudulent excuse for a runner. You should obtain a lethal dose of Demerol and inject it into yourself immediately; if you are not Kip and don't have a license to legally procure controlled substances, there are plenty of other avenues. Good luck and God bless. Happy holidays; I think I'm in love. Dickhead.
The statements made on this message board on face value are no more credible against him than they are for him. Kip and I have some mutual friends that know him far better than I do. Those friends assure me he has been a good, solid ethical guy for many years. For me, this is the tipping point that makes the positive comments here more credible, and the negative cheating claims very suspect. Add this to the fact that anyone runs a 2:51 marathon, would never cheat to run a slower one. Now THAT is... much too obvious.[/quote]