Down goes the Dow

Your ignorance is embarrassing. Perhaps you would do better on another thread?

This too wrote:

Your ignorance is embarrassing. Perhaps you would do better on another thread?

No, you are embarrassing yourself with your incompetent attempt to troll me.

Troll? I’m not the one who thought IRAs had no tax implications. You’re over your head here. Move on. Perhaps you could give Jamin some dating advice?

That too wrote:

Troll? I’m not the one who thought IRAs had no tax implications. You’re over your head here. Move on. Perhaps you could give Jamin some dating advice?

Oh, did I say that? Of course not. Bad troll attemp. Suck another lemon.

Above you wrote “no taxes in an IRA”. It’s there for all to see.

This too wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

No taxes in an IRA and outperformed the S&P 500 in 2018. That was the point, never about 30 years. If you are stupid you miss the point.

Save the insult for the one who thinks there are no taxes with a traditional IRA.

For all to see: there is no tax on capital gains or interest income in a tax sheltered investment. That’s what the term means. Dumb nut fool.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Dow had best January in 30 years. And Ghost says ?

Ah, after the worst December since 1931.

You keep holding your breath that each correction over the last 4 years will be long term. They have not been.

purple martin wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Ah, after the worst December since 1931.

You keep holding your breath that each correction over the last 4 years will be long term. They have not been.

And you are so fearful that it will come you can’t control yourself.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

purple martin wrote:

You keep holding your breath that each correction over the last 4 years will be long term. They have not been.

And you are so fearful that it will come you can’t control yourself.

Better than being fearful for the past 7 years.

One thing about this chart that is not even mentioned is when you revinvest dividends, the return by the S&P over the last 30 years is even higher. Like a 8.3% inflation-adjusted return over the last 30 years. That is 8.3% annual return even figuring in inflation. Inflation in years like 1978 to 1980 were around 10 to 14%. So in spite of those outrageous inflation totals for some years, the market return, even including inflation, around 8.3%. CDs, on the other bitter hand, returned 1%. And, alas, no dividends to boot. LOL.

https://www.putnam.com/literature/pdf/II514-bee9d3d363e6964080e2056af9538b4a.pdf

purple martin wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

And you are so fearful that it will come you can’t control yourself.

Better than being fearful for the past 7 years.

Hey dodo bird, why stop at seven years, go thirty like boy named Sally.

Brickly wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/2019-02-04_11-14-47.jpg?itok=aM21yGl7

A daily adscissa? I’m sure these people know how earnings are reported, so this is a very dishonest representation. And the poster is either ignorant, or equally dishonest.

Exactly. This graph is a blatantly dishonest attempt to deceive people into thinking there has been an earnings decline when, in fact, earnings have been growing at a double-digit rate for over a year. Shame on zerohedge and GOI for promulgating lies.

Yutre wrote:

Brickly wrote:

A daily adscissa? I’m sure these people know how earnings are reported, so this is a very dishonest representation. And the poster is either ignorant, or equally dishonest.

Exactly. This graph is a blatantly dishonest attempt to deceive people into thinking there has been an earnings decline when, in fact, earnings have been growing at a double-digit rate for over a year. Shame on zerohedge and GOI for promulgating lies.

Yutre confused:

More lies from you. The graph you posted was dishonest and you continue your dishonesty by posting are article about FUTURE EARNINGS PREDICTIONS to somehow justify your lie about PAST EARNINGS. Shame on you for trying to deceive people.

Yutre wrote:

More lies from you. The graph you posted was dishonest and you continue your dishonesty by posting are article about FUTURE EARNINGS PREDICTIONS to somehow justify your lie about PAST EARNINGS. Shame on you for trying to deceive people.

Here you go child:

Why don’t you just honestly address her concerns?

Why don’t you just trollingly address his concern?

Ok.

Save your breath.

Congrats, Pats!