Math Mann wrote:
Helloooooo? wrote:
Uh, no, it’s not.
I cringe every time Igy is faced with something mathematical. The outcome is never good.
He said it was off the top of his head. What would you expect?
Math Mann wrote:
Helloooooo? wrote:
Uh, no, it’s not.
I cringe every time Igy is faced with something mathematical. The outcome is never good.
He said it was off the top of his head. What would you expect?
7873-5132=2741
2741/5132=0.5341
0.5341/18.4=0.029
=annualized return 2.9%
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
7873-5132=2741
2741/5132=0.5341
0.5341/18.4=0.029
=annualized return 2.9%
OMG, Igy just stop! You have no idea what you’re doing.
Here, learn yourself up....
https://m.wikihow.com/Calculate-Annualized-Portfolio-ReturnInvestors that bought Tech weighted funds did much worse with all the companies that disappeared in the aftermath of that bubble. In many ways the distortion is more widespread today because it affects a much broader market. Even less growth oriented names are trading double or triple a normal valuation.
Igy
Nah, you need to change your handle.
Actually if we were figuring performance as a portfolio return since the NASDAQ Composite did not set a new high for 15 years and 5 months (August 2015).
So continue to lean yourself up.
Where is the jerk the Oh Snap! Guy when it is actually appropriate.
Igy
Math Mann,
Get to work, use starting and ending value of the MASDAQ Composite compounded each year. Heck it may not even reach 1%.
I’ll let you do the Math, Mann.
Igy
Math Mann wrote:
[quote]Ghost of Igloi wrote:
7873-5132=2741
2741/5132=0.5341
0.5341/18.4=0.029
=annualized return 2.9%
OMG, Igy just stop! You have no idea what you’re doing.
Here, learn yourself up....
From 5,132 to 7,873 over an 18.4 year period is in fact less than 2.9% per year.
Pretty simple. 5,132 times (1+annualratereturn)^18.4 years equals 7,873,
The annual rate of return is @ 2.35%
5,132 x 1.0235^18.4 = 7,869,
God you guys are stupid
You guys are dumb wrote:
Math Mann wrote:
[quote]Ghost of Igloi wrote:
7873-5132=2741
2741/5132=0.5341
0.5341/18.4=0.029
=annualized return 2.9%
OMG, Igy just stop! You have no idea what you’re doing.
Here, learn yourself up....
From 5,132 to 7,873 over an 18.4 year period is in fact less than 2.9% per year.
Pretty simple. 5,132 times (1+annualratereturn)^18.4 years equals 7,873,
The annual rate of return is @ 2.35%
5,132 x 1.0235^18.4 = 7,869,
God you guys are stupid
Bingo.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I’ll let you do the Math, Mann.
Igy
Good move. It’s important to know one’s limitations.
OK, point made 2.35% is a crappy return.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
OK, point made 2.35% is a crappy return.
Yet you tout fixed income instruments that have done worse over the same time period.
Gruntz wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
OK, point made 2.35% is a crappy return.
Yet you tout fixed income instruments that have done worse over the same time period.
Ah, actually that statement is false.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Gruntz wrote:
Yet you tout fixed income instruments that have done worse over the same time period.
Ah, actually that statement is false.
Which part? Touting or “done worse”?
Either way you’re wrong, so I expect you’ll avoid giving a straight answer.
Same time period.
Where’s that Oh Snap Guy!
Gruntz wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Ah, actually that statement is false.
Which part? Touting or “done worse”?
Either way you’re wrong, so I expect you’ll avoid giving a straight answer.
This one even whoops the S&P 500 since 3/31/2000:
https://www.tcw.com/en/Funds/MetWest_Funds/Fixed_Income/MetWest_Total_Return_Bond_FundSomeone please get that jerk the Oh Snap Guy!
Uh, those are blended funds. Care to try again?
Gruntz wrote:
Uh, those are blended funds. Care to try again?
Changing the topic away from your pathetic math are you, Math Man = Irony Man
Easy, 20 year Treasury yield was 6.86% January 2001.
Oh Snap! jerk where are you, three times I have called out for you!
No defense wrote:
Gruntz wrote:
Uh, those are blended funds. Care to try again?
Changing the topic away from your pathetic math are you, Math Man = Irony Man
He’ll next appeal to his Go Pats personal.