I will defer to your enlightened vocabulary.
I will defer to your enlightened vocabulary.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I will defer to your enlightened vocabulary.
Finally you say something intelligent.
Your guidebook to conversing on social media and the world as a “hole.”
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Your guidebook to conversing on social media and the world as a “hole.”
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=dipwad
I wasn’t aware of that resource. Thanks.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
The fact is investors like you continue to pay a higher price for a unit of earnings.
You are also paying that higher price.
Earnings Scorecard: For Q3 2017 (with 55% of the companies in the S&P 500 reporting actual results for the quarter), 76% of S&P 500 companies have reported positive EPS surprises and 67% have reported positive sales surprises.
As predicted, earnings numbers are soaring.
GAAP beats only 58% on lowered numbers.
Earnie wrote:
Earnings Scorecard: For Q3 2017 (with 55% of the companies in the S&P 500 reporting actual results for the quarter), 76% of S&P 500 companies have reported positive EPS surprises and 67% have reported positive sales surprises.
GAAP beats only 58% on lowered EPS guidance.
Only? 58% sounds pretty good to me.
Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 3.0 percent in the third quarter of 2017, according to the "advance" estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Irony Mann wrote:
I was here before you. The fact is that you followed me here.
Don't care one bit.
All I know is that your insipid, repetitive posts under various names have ruined this thread.
Do the world a favor and go elsewhere.
siobahn wrote:
Irony Mann wrote:
I was here before you. The fact is that you followed me here.
Don't care one bit.
All I know is that your insipid, repetitive posts under various names have ruined this thread.
Do the world a favor and go elsewhere.
Oh, the irony!
Salem wrote:
Only? 58% sounds pretty good to me.
You conveniently left out of your quote the key point of lowered EPS guidance.
Same post yet again?
I think the following definition of autism fits you well.
Level 3: “Requiring Very Substantial Support”
Severe deficits in verbal and nonverbal social communication skills cause severe impairments in functioning, very limited initiation of social interactions, and minimal response to social overtures from others.
Inflexibility of behavior, extreme difficulty coping with change, or other restricted/repetitive behaviors markedly interfere with functioning in all spheres. Great distress/difficulty changing focus or action.
Siobahn wrote:
Same post yet again?
I think the following definition of autism fits you well.
Level 3: “Requiring Very Substantial Support”
Severe deficits in verbal and nonverbal social communication skills cause severe impairments in functioning, very limited initiation of social interactions, and minimal response to social overtures from others.
Inflexibility of behavior, extreme difficulty coping with change, or other restricted/repetitive behaviors markedly interfere with functioning in all spheres. Great distress/difficulty changing focus or action.
Are you suggesting someone with autism should not be allowed to post here?
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Salem wrote:
Only? 58% sounds pretty good to me.
You conveniently left out of your quote the key point of lowered EPS guidance.
You need to understand that "guidance" is a term used by the investment industry to mean estimates. Estimates, by nature, are fluid: as more data becomes available, estimates are refined and become more accurate.
The fact that a majority are beating these refined, and more accurate, estimates is impressive.
Not really. You are fooled by a phony market and manipulated EPS.