I directly have asked this wejo-guy about his mistake - for sure no answer. It seems mathematics in the USA is at around the same level as in my country.
I directly have asked this wejo-guy about his mistake - for sure no answer. It seems mathematics in the USA is at around the same level as in my country.
Bad Wigins wrote:
alanson wrote:You've gotta be kidding. Other than her unlucky traffic-avoiding gambit, which cost her almost no time at all, she ran exactly the way you idiots always wanted her to. 200 slower than 27, 400 slower than 57, enough energy left at the end to pass people. If she'd gotten by Sum, you'd all be crowing about how it's better to run 57.5 and 61.3 than 56.0 and 61.9. Never mind if the final result is a full second slower.
Don't make me humiliate you Montano-haters further. This time you should all quickly admit you're wrong and save face.
Yeah, the slower time had nothing to do with the fact that this wasnt the WC final. People rarely run their best time right after a championship.
No, people don't want her do have enough to "pass people", but to hold off people. Like she would had she opened slower in Moscow.
I hate to say it but bw is right. If the lanes are 1.25m, then the diagonal from lane one to five on an 84m straight is 84.14m, so it is only an extra 14 centimeters.
Scandinavian Fellow wrote:
7:30 before last lap
Dibaba fails completely from 250 out.
Defar wins 8:30.30, last lap 60 sec (59.99)
2. Cherono 8:31
3. Hassan 8:32
Rowbury 5-6th
Sifan Hassan is the real deal, she'll be one of the favorites for the world championships when she will be allowed to compete in 2 years.
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Da Troof wrote:drug testing is working
Actually not if Ukrainians are winning.
If blacks win it's because they're naturally superior, but if whites win it's because they're doped, right?
WIGAND = RACIST
Good Lord, you're an idiot. Montano ran a tactically perfect race for her through 700. Yes, the time was a second slower. So what? In case you didn't notice, the times were slower across the board in pretty much every event today, and she finished higher against virtually the same field from Moscow, despite her inexplicable finish. And in a race decided by .12 of a second, every inch counts. Would she have won by running normally? Nobody knows, it would have been close. But there's no excuse for drifting like that. Look, I'm a big fan of Montano's, and I want her to succeed. But if you can watch her last two races and conclude that she's doing nothing wrong, then there isn't much hope for you.
Then again, you're the same moron who thinks that Mo Farah can't break 27:00. Is there anything in track that you are knowledgeable about?
jjjjjjjj wrote:
I hate to say it but bw is right. If the lanes are 1.25m, then the diagonal from lane one to five on an 84m straight is 84.14m, so it is only an extra 14 centimeters.
That's assuming she ran a perfect diagonal from the top of the straight to the line. Looking at the video, it seems like she stayed in the same part of Lane 3 for a while before drifting out further with about 50m to go. That adds a bit more distance. Not a whole lot, but I think that she could have challenged Sum at the line.
Da Troof wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:Actually not if Ukrainians are winning.
If blacks win it's because they're naturally superior, but if whites win it's because they're doped, right?
WIGAND = RACIST
Never mentioned race. You could have Sheryf El-Sheryf and I'd still feel the same way.
You didn't have to, everybody knows that Ukraine is a white country.
Leave it to a racist like you to say that no way a white guy could run 20.6 unless he was on drugs.
You got anything other than the fact that he's white to suspect he's on drugs? Of course not.
WIGAND = RACIST