Are you a runner aged 35 or older?

>online survey data

>research that is in any way reputable

pick one

How much are you paying?

>online survey data

>research that is in any way reputable

pick one[/quote]

Is there a question or statement in there?

I did it - took just a few minutes

Thank you. If you leave your email we will send you the aggregate data at study's end. If you want you can compare your training/health habits to the study as a whole.

Sorry, not paying anything except our respect to you as a runner who is interested in this controversy. We'd be happy to send you the aggregate data at study's end if you are interested

moron wrote:

>online survey data

>research that is in any way reputable

pick one

Wrong.

I'll pass. Thanks for the opportunity.

done

memCVdoc wrote:

Sorry, not paying anything except our respect to you as a runner who is interested in this controversy.

What controversy?

jusst another way to stalk people

Done. Takes about 2 minutes. Synthroid anyone?

Bang Ding Ow wrote:

What controversy?

Don't read much do you? Ever try google to get information?

Good survey.

My Dr told me that my body was a Ferrari because of my running.

I have high cholesterol (but it's coming down with diet) but all my other blood work is "perfect".

sometimes its good to read wrote:

Don't read much do you? Ever try google to get information?

Ever try to go fu\ck yourself? I'm asking the OP who's conducting a survey what he's investigating.

Did anyone take this? You'd have to be a total idiot to provide such detailed medical history to a complete stranger.

I bet they'll get a huge response from LRC posters. ha ha ha!

Bang Ding Ow wrote:

sometimes its good to read wrote:

Don't read much do you? Ever try google to get information?

Ever try to go (fornicate) yourself? I'm asking the OP who's conducting a survey what he's investigating.

We're trying to sort our why some recent large, well done studies have suggested a "dose-response" effect with regard to running and longevity; ie- runners in general live longer vs nonrunners but beyond ~20miles/week this benefit starts to disappear. We suspect there are confounders causing this effect and are looking for explanations.

memCVdoc wrote:

Bang Ding Ow wrote:

Ever try to go (fornicate) yourself? I'm asking the OP who's conducting a survey what he's investigating.

We're trying to sort our why some recent large, well done studies have suggested a "dose-response" effect with regard to running and longevity; ie- runners in general live longer vs nonrunners but beyond ~20miles/week this benefit starts to disappear. We suspect there are confounders causing this effect and are looking for explanations.

You can't be serious. How will collecting detailed medical information on LIVING runners help you explain why one subpopulation of runners may die earlier than another subpopulation? Are you planning on continuing to stalk your responders over time to determine their ultimate longevities and causes of death?

BOGUS.

[/quote]

You can't be serious. How will collecting detailed medical information on LIVING runners help you explain why one subpopulation of runners may die earlier than another subpopulation? Are you planning on continuing to stalk your responders over time to determine their ultimate longevities and causes of death?

BOGUS.[/quote]

Apparently you know nothing about research.