Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 |
TrollPatroll
EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 3:29PM Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Wharf to Wharf 6 mile 2013
1. Emily Infeld 30:52
That's fast for a hilly 6 mile course. She could go sub 31 for a track 10K and should be at the World championships. Solinsky only beat her by a little over a minute and she beat some top Ethiopians by a large margin.
SoCalXC
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 5:19PM - in reply to TrollPatroll Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
The girl gets no love. Great athlete! Definitely one to watch in the coming years.
Leap year
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 6:25PM - in reply to Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Anybody know why she didn't run US track nationals this year?
Sunny much
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 6:52PM - in reply to Leap year Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Injured at USATF.
Along with Fernandez.
TooLegit2Quit
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 7:14PM - in reply to Sunny much Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Sunny much wrote:

Injured at USATF.
Along with Fernandez.

The fact that she was injured at USATF makes her run today even more impressive
mgm
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 7:19PM - in reply to TooLegit2Quit Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
It seemed to me that Infeld was always overshadowed in college by Jordan and Sheila.
TooLegit2Quit
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 7:29PM - in reply to mgm Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Emily Infeld > Jordan Hasay right now
I don't Hasay would have won honestly.
Hasay's 31:46 10K on the track is equal to 30:40 for 6 miles on a track. Infeld ran 30:52 over 6 miles with hills, which adds AT LEAST 30 seconds, maybe a minute as compared to a track or flat course.
So... her run equates to 30:50-31:20 for a track 10K.
Shocked
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 7:32PM - in reply to TooLegit2Quit Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

TooLegit2Quit wrote:

Emily Infeld > Jordan Hasay right now
I don't Hasay would have won honestly.
Hasay's 31:46 10K on the track is equal to 30:40 for 6 miles on a track. Infeld ran 30:52 over 6 miles with hills, which adds AT LEAST 30 seconds, maybe a minute as compared to a track or flat course.
So... her run equates to 30:50-31:20 for a track 10K.


Seriously, un-real performance. This is her event for sure.
alanson
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 8:13PM - in reply to TrollPatroll Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Hasn't she been running the 1500?
J.R.
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 8:25PM - in reply to TrollPatroll Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

TrollPatroll wrote:

Wharf to Wharf 6 mile 2013
1. Emily Infeld 30:52
That's fast for a hilly 6 mile course. She could go sub 31 for a track 10K and should be at the World championships.


She didn't qualify.
szerzinblockin
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 9:13PM - in reply to J.R. Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
She's hot
alanson
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 9:26PM - in reply to TrollPatroll Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Great article here.

http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/ci_23747026/emily-infeld-cruises-womens-title-at-41st-annual?source=rss_viewed

She's clutching a trophy about as big as she is. Also won $5000 (not knowing what the prize was when she entered).

Her one and only race at that distance.
just sayinggggg
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 10:09PM - in reply to alanson Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
The 18 MPH tailwind the whole way helped....
just sayinggggg
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 10:10PM - in reply to just sayinggggg Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Shalane, Hasay, and Emily. Good 10K team.
Sgshshs
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 10:12PM - in reply to szerzinblockin Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
She was looking cute. Has lost some of her collegiate doughiness.
just sayinggggg
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 10:17PM - in reply to Sgshshs Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
4 STEPHANIE ROTHSTEIN BRUCE, FLAGSTAFF, AZ 31:16.23


Her PR in the 10K is 32:24.25.....

Fast course.
RealityCheck
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 10:23PM - in reply to TrollPatroll Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Was there really a tailwind the whole way?
RealityCheck
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 10:30PM - in reply to just sayinggggg Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

just sayinggggg wrote:

4 STEPHANIE ROTHSTEIN BRUCE, FLAGSTAFF, AZ 31:16.23


Her PR in the 10K is 32:24.25.....

Fast course.

Well... Her 10K PR is probably outdated. Stephanie could probably run 31:30s for 10K with a 1:10 HM PR. Think about it.
santa cruz weather
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 10:30PM - in reply to RealityCheck Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
almost always a tailwind, that course is mostly west to east... 90% of the time the wind is blowing that way there.
re recheck
RE: EMILY INFELD 30:52!! 7/28/2013 10:32PM - in reply to RealityCheck Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
2012 Olympic trials..

RealityCheck wrote:


just sayinggggg wrote:

4 STEPHANIE ROTHSTEIN BRUCE, FLAGSTAFF, AZ 31:16.23


Her PR in the 10K is 32:24.25.....

Fast course.

Well... Her 10K PR is probably outdated. Stephanie could probably run 31:30s for 10K with a 1:10 HM PR. Think about it.
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 |