He'll never admit it.You know what they say about
speaking with 'forked tongue'.
He'll never admit it.You know what they say about
speaking with 'forked tongue'.
Sprintgeezer wrote:or for strategic reasons to avoid Pearson
drivel
pearson isn't current form number 1 & only run 12'67 so far
that's NO current form to fear
even in her peak form of 12.28 from '11, brianna's run a faster basic time adjusted for wind/altitude/rt by ~ 0.05s
which is why I haven't started a "down goes" thread
"gimmick"
topic starting is refuge for shall we say, not non-morons...
Sprintgeezer wrote:
Reported
You too.
Not really. I am not a beeyatch
Sprintgeezer wrote:
I'm waiting to hear a reason, so that I can start the seemingly inevitable "Down goes Rollins" thread.
Down goes Rollins! Down goes Rollins! Down goes Rollins!
Because I never forget.
Where are all the jack-off’s from 7 years ago now? Nowhere, that’s where.
Eat it.😡
Sprintgeezer wrote:
Down goes Rollins! Down goes Rollins! Down goes Rollins!
Ok, but she already went down (got banned) in 2017 for her first doping infraction. You missed pointing that out.
In other news: this lucky lady got off easy again. And for some unknown reason(s), she still gets to compete for a few weeks despite the ban, the ban was announced with a long delay, and its details are being withheld...
Yes I know, but this one could finally be the real deal.
Details should be released once irrelevant personal info is redacted, unless the release would somehow be damaging to the system.
We will see. Sucks to see her still on the track, taking a lane from someone else more deserving.
Never need to see her again.
Sprintgeezer wrote:
Details should be released once irrelevant personal info is redacted, unless the release would somehow be damaging to the system.
Yes, that really is a peculiar situation. I wonder what makes her case so unique that she still may compete despite having been banned:
CAS had granted McNeal 'provisional relief and temporarily stayed' the tribunal's decision so she can compete until the end of the US Olympic trials on June 27.
And I wonder why the tribunal's decision from April 21st was kept a secret for some six weeks.
And I wonder why the AIU cites confidentiality reasons instead of (finally) releasing the details as normally done. All very strange.
why is anyone surprised? Look at her coach and agent. But why is she being given a pass to provisionally compete in the Trials? Explanation is lacking .