Beyonce is CLEARLY anti-abortion. Why isn't she vilified?

Wondering d wrote:

Just watched the Beyonce documentary on HBO and it is quite clear that she is vehemently anti-abortion. How come no one is talking about this? Where is the outrage?

Have you seen her boobs...? Question answered.

yeah, i hear ya. Kind of like Chris brown or something... If you're famous and look good, you can do anything.

She does have some damned nice jugs.

Why would there be outrage? She is entitled to her opinion, and people, whether they agree or not, should respect her opinion.

Some of us save our outrage on topics like this for actual policymakers.

bc no one actually watched that HBO thing.

Don't you know us brothas cherry pick our fights.

Just last week, L'il Wayne insulted the memory of Emmitt Till. Now you ask, who was Emmitt Till? He was a 14-year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman in Mississippi in 1955. He was murdered as an example to all blacks and his death started the civil rights movement. It is a very sacred thing although almost 60 years later.

L'il Wayne being black and a big thang now, so we don't malign him for it. Kinda like when I and all blacks called Bush unpatriotic because he added to the national debt during the wars but when I do it, its good business.

Back to Beyonce, she do have a nice pair a t!tties.

Suckas.

I honestly cannot understand how anyone can be pro-choice at this point. It is clearly a human inside of the uterus. I mean, have you seen an ultrasound? I totally understand the complications with rape/incest and all the rest, but "the right to choose" on a general level is just a practice in ignorance.

Pathetic attempt to ridicule the opinions of non-barbaric Americans.

Pro Life wrote:

I honestly cannot understand how anyone can be pro-choice at this point. It is clearly a human inside of the uterus. I mean, have you seen an ultrasound? I totally understand the complications with rape/incest and all the rest, but "the right to choose" on a general level is just a practice in ignorance.

Life begins at conception?

worst poster wrote:

Pathetic attempt to ridicule the opinions of non-barbaric Americans.

Forcing women and girls to have babies they don't want is pretty barbaric. Imprisoning doctors for performing certain medical procedures or women for receiving them is tyrannical.

If you are trying to legally impose your warped sense of morality on society be prepared for a fight.

conservati radio guy wrote:

Life begins at conception?

I am not sure. Are you? I am not here to argue semantics, but I know that killing a baby is wrong.

Weary wrote:

Some of us save our outrage on topics like this for actual policymakers.

This is a good point. Most "Pro-choice" people, myself included, respect the opinion of individuals that are personally against the idea of abortion--it's a reasonable sentiment. However, they believe that other individuals should maintain the right to pursue a safe abortion too. If Beyoncé doesn't like abortions, that's fine, it's her choice. But that shouldn't prevent other women from making their own choices.

My Name Is Judge wrote:

This is a good point. Most "Pro-choice" people, myself included, respect the opinion of individuals that are personally against the idea of abortion--it's a reasonable sentiment. However, they believe that other individuals should maintain the right to pursue a safe abortion too. If Beyoncé doesn't like abortions, that's fine, it's her choice. But that shouldn't prevent other women from making their own choices.

What about my choice to own my black slave? I mean, I am fine with the fact that you don't want to own another human and that you think it is wrong - that is your choice - but I want to be able to legally own slaves. Your views should not prevent me from owning slaves.

lkjh wrote:

Forcing women and girls to have babies they don't want is pretty barbaric.

More barbaric that sucking out the baby and screwing its skull? Nope.

lkjh wrote:

Imprisoning doctors for performing certain medical procedures or women for receiving them is tyrannical.

Eh..? So if I kill someone via a "medical procedure" it is okay? Murder is murder, homey. If you kill someone, you should be imprisoned.

quote]lkjh wrote:

If you are trying to legally impose your warped sense of morality on society be prepared for a fight.[/quote]

Killing babies is somehow moral, but stopping the killing of babies is "warped?" I think you're the one that needs to reexamine your stance on the issue. Nothing about killing babies is good. Nothing. It is about the worst possible thing that you can do.

Pro Life wrote:

conservati radio guy wrote:

Life begins at conception?

I am not sure. Are you? I am not here to argue semantics, but I know that killing a baby is wrong.

No, I am not. In your prev comment you used the view of an ultrsound as why you equated fetus w/ baby. Can you pick up a zygote (might be completely wrong term there) on an ultra sound? Do you call a just fertilized egg a baby?

I believe there is a continuum from conception to live birth. I am drawing my arbitrary line at around 3mo (with exceptions). Where is your arbitrary line?

You're a troll wrote:

Nothing about killing babies is good. Nothing. It is about the worst possible thing that you can do.

This. It is hard to argue against this, no matter what your views might be. At the end of the day, if you remove all of the political mumbo-jumbo, we are talking about killing babies and that is disgusting on a very primal level.

Not Pro-Life, but my line would be a heartbeat, which is what, 14 days?

I would say it is "life" the second conception occurs, but not a baby until a heartbeat.

conservati radio guy wrote:

I am drawing my arbitrary line at around 3mo (with exceptions).

Here is a baby at 2 months. 1 full month before your line:

Would feel comfortable killing that and not calling it a baby?

The woman (in nearly all cases) was a willing participant in making the baby, No?