http://www.letsrun.com/news/20...legations/
We transcribed the nearly 23 minutes of interviews for you.
And no body cares.
LetsRun.com wrote:
http://www.letsrun.com/news/20...legations/
We transcribed the nearly 23 minutes of interviews for you.
Follow-up questions:
Bullet the Blue Sky wrote:
Weak, weak interview. How about asking some tough questions .... Did you have a sexual relationship with anyone on your team? How many current and former athletes have you had sexual relationships with?
Those would have been a good start.
^^That's some rigorous reporting right there (not).
LetsRun.com wrote:
http://www.letsrun.com/news/20...legations/
We transcribed the nearly 23 minutes of interviews for you.
"No body"? Kind of like the deal with Jimmy Hoffa?....
no taste in music wrote:
And no body cares.
Oh really? Just like Emma Kurtesz did anything he wanted because Hadsell ruled all his runners by fear? Why would every assistant coach say what Hadsell wanted (that loser from Deadspin, and you may well be him, did his best to dig everywhere in the past) since he is gone from the program anyway?
Cancelled wrote:
I feel like this is giving him the oppurtunity to shape the story in the same way that lance was able to.
The whole part about always having his girlfriend/assistant coach around for conversations in the office is useless. You think she's gonna throw him under the bus? The assistant coach is gonna say whatever Hadsell tells her to if she gets questioned.
Yeah, that makes sense, since Caitlin wasn't even on the team at that point, and if you knew anything at all you would know that Emma dearly wanted Hadsell and he did not reciprocate.
113 wrote:
You say you never had a sexual relationship with anyone on the team. Then what did you mean when you texted: "I would hook up with Caitliln I haven't but if she wasn't psycho I would. But you and I are far too cool not to." and "It may be a good ride. Just sayin."
Did you just want to have sexual relationships with your athletes, but got shot down? Does that somehow make it better?
They are misogynists for printing word for word what Hadsell said, but Emma is a princess for repeatedly lying, conniving, etc. OK.
here we go again wrote:
Further evidence this site panders to misogynists.
Brojos, you should be ashamed of yourself.
It is painfully obvious he is refusing to throw mud at the anorexic jilted thing who used to run for him and is now carrying on her freak show in Rochester Hills.
Mr. Obvious wrote:
I suspect he cannot be forthcoming because the charges are either largely or fully accurate.
Way to keep it classy.
Pocket Rocket wrote:
It is painfully obvious he is refusing to throw mud at the anorexic jilted thing who used to run for him and is now carrying on her freak show in Rochester Hills.
Jesus this place is full of idiots. People believe the deadspin story because that is what the typical human likes - dirt about people they don't know even when it is made up. What a joke. And before any of you even it, since you are all more than dumb enough to go there, I am not Kevin Hadsell, do not care to support him but have a "thing" against witch hunt because someone, or "some one" once tried to bring me down that way and she almost got her wish cuz everyone wants to believe the stinkcrack.
A person who laps up the tripe of a Deadspin "reporter" whose job is to be as ethics free as possible, and stands on the side of a woman obviously lying, is now worried about class. Gotta love the world we live in.
Mr. Obvious wrote:
Way to keep it classy.
I'm not standing on anybody's side. I don't totally believe that the Deadspin article is the whole truth either.
Pocket Rocket wrote:Mr. Obvious wrote:A person who laps up the tripe of a Deadspin "reporter" whose job is to be as ethics free as possible, and stands on the side of a woman obviously lying, is now worried about class. Gotta love the world we live in.
Way to keep it classy.
Tell me what people, do you think he made up that story about Emma running on the golf course when she had been told not to because she was losing a butt load of weight and running multiple times a day? Or is that just Hadsell and his "misogyny," I wonder.
I disagree that it's irrelevant. If she lied about that she could have lied about a lot of things.
Mr. Obvious wrote:
I'm not standing on anybody's side. I don't totally believe that the Deadspin article is the whole truth either.
I do not know what to think about the golf course story except that it is irrelevant.
Not to quibble, but the guy who wrote the Deadspin piece isn't interested in whether some track coach in a shitty industrial town is a public figure on a minor or major scale, which he is not. You have to be as hot/fast as Suzy H or as diabolical as Oscar P to achieve that status as a track type. His concern is becoming a nationally known figure himself. How many people who write for rumor/bullshit generators like Deadspin don't aspire to something better, even if in 95% of cases, that is a pipe dream?
legaleaglez wrote:
You could argue, if these claims are false (including other defamatory claims) then the deadspin article casts him into the national spotlight without merit.