ex-runner123 wrote:
I liked rock climbing but it eats up alot of time. You also gotta be doing it regularly like almost everyday if you want to get good. Unfortunately, the nearest climbing gym is too far to be doing everyday. I think it's most similar to running in that you know how good you are by the rating of the climbs you're doing. Kinda like knowing what pace you're running.
Actually, the time commitment for training is very similar to running. Three x three hour sessions/week, properly done, are more than sufficient to progress rapidly. That said, most climbers have a poor understanding of training, and waste a ton of time and energy.
One other benefit. The year I began to climb, 1977, the hardest climb in the world was 5.13a. I climbed that in 1991, and climb much harder than that today, well into my 50's. There are not too many sports where a really fit geezer can mix it up with the young guns.
Climbing rewards smart training,technique and mental acuity proportionally more than running, so if you are up to the challenge, you are in for a lifetime of it. Plus, the aesthetics of great climbs and areas is unparallelled in almost any sport, in addition to the cameraderie.
If you have neglected your upper body and flexibility though, the first year or two might be humbling.