He said she said B.S.
Get a Clue Dude wrote:Hey pal wrote:Please get a freaking clue!
Most people who are Pro-Armstrong aren't saying he didn't dope. Most people who are Pro-Armstrong are humanists who don't believe it is right to obliterate someone for mistakes. I am not saying what he did was right, I am looking for some compassion and empathy. In the doping era they don't have the same idioms we do now and therefore it wasn't sacrilegious to dope. He isn't totally immoral. He still has done some miraculous things.
Also, don't pretend to know people's motivations. You have no clue what Lance's interests are concerning cancer.
The issue with Lance that makes him a complete and total asshole is his decisions and actions to destroy, utterly destroy those who dared to tell the truth.
Nothing else is relevant.
Stop with the "Oh, let's not judge his doping so harshly..." Sure, he doped. So did many others in many sports. It's cheating and should be handled as such. It is not enough for folks to pile on and that is not what people are piling on about. Please try to catch up.
All I am looking for are the other parts to this equation. You are just like all my other Freshman students.