Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
bguyMilleniumJ2012
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 7:45PM - in reply to wdude Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
she's as good, if not better, than the African girls of her age no doubt.
joecrunner
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 8:03PM - in reply to bguyMilleniumJ2012 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I was there and got my pic with her after. She was so humble and flattered. She was beaming after the race and on her phone telling the news. I told Alberto who was next to us "you've got a once in a lifetime runner here, she will be great." To which he smiled and said, "We'll see, we're taking one race at a time."
worst poster
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 8:44PM - in reply to Woxl Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Woxl wrote:

Is she the one being trained by Alberto Salazar?


No, that is a different Mary Cain, its a common name.
Luke's Father
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 9:11PM - in reply to bguyMilleniumJ2012 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
How can she set the high school record when she is a professional runner?
pac12fan
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 9:35PM - in reply to bguyMilleniumJ2012 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
She will destroy in an Oregon uniform in 2 years.
mcmillan forever you know
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 9:46PM - in reply to pac12fan Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
4:11 1500 does not equal 4:28 mile. More like 4:32.
The Bible of the Sport
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 9:54PM - in reply to mcmillan forever you know Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
T&FN will apparently recognize it as an overall High School Record (but not a HS Indoor Record, since it's on an oversized track):

http://www.trackandfieldnews.com/discussion/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=48868
ksks
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 10:03PM - in reply to mcmillan forever you know Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

mcmillan forever you know wrote:

4:11 1500 does not equal 4:28 mile. More like 4:32.



Is that really true? That's 21 seconds for 109(?) Meters. Isn't 5:20 mile pace 20 secs per 100m?
coach de
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 10:07PM - in reply to ksks Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Yawn, Zola budd ran 15;01 for 5000m at the same age.
wdude
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 10:20PM - in reply to coach de Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Nope, she was 17 not 16. Nice try.
WADA YA KNOW
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 10:21PM - in reply to Numbersguy Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Test her.
worst poster
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 10:23PM - in reply to coach de Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
And her PR is only 12 sec lower than that. So, yeah, yawn.
alejandro
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 10:27PM - in reply to WADA YA KNOW Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Can anyone provide some race details - i.e., rabbit(s), splits, leaders ?
wdude
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 10:40PM - in reply to alejandro Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
video? pics?
The Animal Within
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 11:11PM - in reply to coach de Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Agreed. I've always been amazed more HS girls don't run sub 10 for 3200. You'd think the number of boys running sub 9 now sub 10 is a decent equivalent.

I guess the depth and talent of the boys is just that much more superior.
joecrunner
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 11:14PM - in reply to alejandro Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Rabbit made it to about 1200m, I believe I heard 1 mile was reached in 4:57, so Cain picked it up considerably.
J.R.
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 11:17PM - in reply to The Animal Within Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

The Animal Within wrote:

Agreed. I've always been amazed more HS girls don't run sub 10 for 3200. You'd think the number of boys running sub 9 now sub 10 is a decent equivalent.

I guess the depth and talent of the boys is just that much more superior.


Which it should be considering boys have had the opportunity to compete for much longer. However the girls marks and depth are improving more rapidly.
mcmillan forever you know
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/12/2013 11:21PM - in reply to ksks Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

ksks wrote:


mcmillan forever you know wrote:

4:11 1500 does not equal 4:28 mile. More like 4:32.



Is that really true? That's 21 seconds for 109(?) Meters. Isn't 5:20 mile pace 20 secs per 100m?



Exactly. If she just ran all-out to get that 4:11, there is no way she would hold that pace for 109 more meters.

Go ahead and plug it into the mcmillan calculator

http://www.mcmillanrunning.com/index.php/calcUsage/calculate

It says 4:11 1500 = 4:32.5 mile.
Bad Wigins
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/13/2013 12:32AM - in reply to mcmillan forever you know Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
McMillan's wrong.

4:11 pace is about 16.7 per 100. Throw in another 109m in the middle of that, it's not gonna be 19 seconds. 18, maybe. 4:29.
Mr. Battery
RE: Cain 9:02!!! 1/13/2013 12:49AM - in reply to mcmillan forever you know Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
The tried and true conversion for 1500 to mile has been to multiply the 1500 by 1.08. It's been that way for ages.

4:11.01 = 4:31.1
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |