Brian wrote:
Don't hold the handles or arm poles at all. I try to shoot for a combination of resistance and stride rate that lets me get the most wattage without wearing out my legs to fast. I don't do my arms in a running motion, though. I just kind of hang them at my sides with a little movement. Your stride rate should be higher on the elliptical because the stride is so short, so it feels weird to do anything with your arms. It is more like cycling than running.
I have been relegated to the elliptical mostly for months and can get my HR as high for as long as a normal run. By the end, I could work out daily at HRs on the elliptical that would wear me out running everyday.
Agree with this.
No way you can elevate the heartrate whiile holding on to the handles because they limit your stride rate to very low levels. I did try to hold on to the handles very low which matched the stride rate but it was so awkward it wouldn't have worked for long periods of time. I work out on a Lifefitness eliptical that is the best I have ever used. I hold on to the middle handles which is also a heartrate monitor. The problem with other models are that the footpedals are positioned to keep the body leaning backwards instead of the natural forward lean used to propel yourself forward if you were running or against the resistence on the eliptical. On inferior machines, I have put the back of my foot up on the side of the pedals to give myself a little more of this forward lean and that helped a lot.
I used the stairmaster for years and then transitioned to the eliptical the last 2-3 years. I run 2-3 times a week and eliptical 3-4 times a week. I can work out much harder on the eliptical with little chance of injury. I have to limit my running because at 48, any hard running requires 2-3 days before I can run again.