hahah hahaha wrote:
Kudos to Dr. Paul Thompson of Hartford Hospital for calling out the bullshit in this article
Oh, but didn't you read closely? Thompson can't comment intelligently on this because he's one of them!
"The guys advancing the hypothesis that you can get too much exercise are manipulating the data," said Paul Thompson, a former elite marathoner and nationally renowned sports cardiologist at Hartford Hospital. "They have an agenda."
Sports cardiologist James O'Keefe, an author of the Heart paper, counters that Dr. Thompson is an exercise addict. "He, like many chronic exercise addicts, is the one with an agenda," said Dr. O'Keefe, a sports cardiologist at Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute in Kansas City. "My 'agenda' is my patients."
Glad to see Dr O'Keefe avoiding the ad hominem tactic and defending his findings on a rational basis. I'm imagining this exchange:
Ezekiel Six-Pack, a Houston-based psychiatrist who has often appeared on CNN, and his colleagues recently published a paper turning conventional wisdom on its head: Attractive single people, Six-Pack asserts, have a much poor chance getting laid after a night out than fat ugly people who haven't showered in two weeks.
John Doe, Ph.D., a nationally acclaimed psychologist at Stanford University's School of Applied Thinking, disputes Dr. Six-Pack's conclusions. "If you look at the methodology," says Doe, "it's clear that Dr. Six-Pack went into this 'study' with a pre-determined conclusion and went hunting for evidence to support it. Anyone with a basic knowledge of biostatistics can pull that off."
"That guy's a douchebag," counters Six-Pack, rooting through the thick thatch of shit-encrusted hair ringing his anus and retrieving a few choice dingleberries, which he pauses to examine before shoveling them into his mouth. "He sounds like every other pretty-boy who's afraid of competition from those he perceives as lesser specimens."
Obviously a careful look at O'Keefe's work would be necessary to determine whether Dr. Thompson is in fact right, but 99 times out of 100, when someone makes a "discovery" that contravenes a considerable body of knowledge, he's not a Galileo or an Einstein, he's just a crank.