| Haha YO (super surreal) |
| ||
|
I thought “Fear and Loathing at the Olympic Trials” was a pretty funny blog post - the comment about the letsrun message boards being a “haven for the seriously unwell” alone made it worth reading. I like HST, but it didn’t cross my mind to compare the post to HST’s writing. I took the post for what it was, I guess – a light blog post about the trials. There’s something really depressing to me about the negative comments in this thread, though, which are typical of the comments on many other letsrun.com message board threads. Presumptuous generalizations that may not be based in reality follow, but I suspect some of them are valid. I assume that at least some of the negative comments on this thread were not written by the same person. Maybe not. In any event, if these comments are indicative of your “real life” personalities, you must be pretty fun to hang with. In fairness, I guess I was probably overly-critical and sarcastic when I was in high school too, but I cringe to read such overly-critical and sarcastic comments now. You guys really thought that “Fear and Loathing at the Olympic Trials” – a f’n blog post - was “gadawful [sic],” a “snooze fest,” and “[l]acking in original thought”? “[T]wo minutes of my life I’ll never get back”? “F*cking hate the writing style with a passion”? Please. I’m sure your HS or college essays are brilliant. Or they would be if you cared or tried, right? After all, most of you have IQs and SAT scores in the 99th percentile. Is it accurate to assume that you are the same poster (or posters) who consider a “bicentennial” or “triple century” - with “real” beer only, of course – to be a laudable and worthwhile goal? And that troll threads about joggers, dating advice, and race-baiting are the pinnacle of comedic and intellectual achievement? To me, this comment sums up pretty well how a lot of you – your internet personas, anyway - probably view the world: “[t]he writer is your quinessential whiny hipster . . . . [who] would probably tell you he liked the Olympics before you did, before it was cool to like the [O]lympics.” The prevailing view on this board seems to be that a “hipster” is anyone who is perceived as doing anything “to be cool” in a non-mainstream way. Probably because most of you lack the confidence to deviate from the norm (the norm for HS or college runners, such as it is) or try your hand at anything creative, that definition also encompasses anyone who actually is doing something cool in a non-mainstream way. I have my doubts that any hipster – let alone a “quintessential” hipster – actually would admit to liking the Olympics. Don’t hipsters attempt to mask their deep-seated fear of being judged by others by only liking things ironically and never actually coming out in support of anything? But I also have my doubts that Jeff Edmonds qualifies as a “hipster” under any definition of the term outside of letsrun. As an aside, I’m curious, when did it become cool to like the Olympics anyway? 776 BC? 1796? 1896? Other than the hipster shield of irony, another obvious work-around to the fear of rejection is to take the approach of letsrun bashers and criticize everyone else’s accomplishments, taste, and efforts that don’t conform to a very narrow set of standards. Maybe that’s another flavor of “hipsterness,” only not as fun because no one tries to emulate it or considers it to be cool. Let’s face it, bros and golf shirt-wearing HS and college runners aren’t creating any art or literature (othen than uber-clever Tucker Max) or sparking any fashion movements or music scenes. Yes, hipster irony is passé and grating. Not even hipsters like it. Good luck finding a so-called hipster (your definition or the Portlandia definition) who will admit to being a hipster, other than in an ironic way. Okay, yes, that was an irrelevant tangent. The fact is, however, that hipster irony is far less grating than the destructive and negative attitudes and comments on this thread. I assure you most “hipsters” - as well as the rest of us - don’t spend too much time worrying about you. I f*n love the song “Subdivisions.” I’m sure this has been said before, but the letsrun message boards are a complete car crash, and I’m just another rubbernecker. |
| TruthFart |
| ||
Isn't this a prerequisite for most male distance runners? I mean distances 5K and beyond? Face it. Male distance runners are pretty prissy. EXCEPT FOR PRE!!!!! |
| TruthFart |
| ||
See? Someone just spent a half an hour defending his man crush blogger. I must now retire happily correct. |
| The Chupacabra |
| ||
|
I thought th blog was funny. Obviously the guy is not going to be as good a writer as Hunter S. Thompson. That would be like comparing Rupp to Pre. |
| Clark |
| ||
So you're not the only one who calls him the good doctor? That's a relief. I'll have to read this article and see how it measures up. |
| sharp elbows |
| ||
|
Funny in a sophomoric way. I give credit for an attempt at Gonzo style humor. If you hate this guy, maybe you don't have a funny bone at all. This is not reporting. It's satire. Duh. |
| sharp elbows |
| ||
|
Funny in a sophomoric way. I give credit for an attempt at Gonzo style humor. If you hate this guy, maybe you don't have a funny bone at all. This is not reporting. It's satire. Duh. |
| come on guys |
| ||
|
It's a good read. This guy has been putting out interesting running related philosophy essays for years. Some of you must be a hoot to hang out with. Do you take everything so seriously? |
| jimjamesrunner |
| ||
|
If only you knew the writer personally, he knows more about running than you f***s could ever dream of. He's a mastermind, regardless of his ability to use rhetorical devices to your liking. |
| Pat M |
| ||
|
Awful,Just God awful. As a reader of Thompson since the articles that became "Hells Angels, a Strange and Terrible Saga...", it is criminal to think that this drivel bears any resemblance to the good doctor's work, even to the amateurish Rum Diaries (not my favorite HST work) |
| Consider This |
| ||
You must be new here. |
| Pat M, literary critic |
| ||
|
Pat M, if you've really read a lot of Thompson, you would know that his work got really repetitive and was a shadow of his former self as early as the late 80s (though I will give you that The Great Shark Hunt was pretty good.) So, not even the good doctor himself could write as well as the good doctor. And, if you are really the astute literary critic that you make yourself out to be, you'd think you could tell the difference between an article that claims to be as good as any original piece and a freaking blog post that borrows loosely from HST's style in order to give a funny and different angle on the trials. Anyways, I'm not arguing that you have to like the piece. Tastes differ. But to criticize a piece because it doesn't exactly replicate the writing of a dude who lost his mind 30+ years ago betrays piss poor critical skills. |
| Pat M |
| ||
|
One does not to be an astute literary critic (which I am not) to criticize an article that is neither original nor a faithful rendition of the original author's work. This trash is clearly a naked rip off of one of the seminal works of "Gonzo" journalism Rip me if you wish. I've been ripped by better |
| Pat M, literary critic |
| ||
It was obviously a "rip off." That's partly why it was funny, you idiot. |
| PT In Eugene |
| ||
|
Pat M, Is is safe to assume Mr. Shirley is Bill Dellinger (who lives in the Pre's rock neighborhood and whose father was named Shirley?? |
| Common Sense Approach |
| ||
|
Probably not. Dellinger really is not capable of taking a walk up that hill. Mr Shirley is probably the Mr Shirley who marketed bronze statues of Pre a few years back. That same Mr Shirley was instrumental in donations that resulted in preserving the Pre's rock site when it appeared that ODOT would be selling the lot. |
| grizz |
| ||
|
I didn't find it funny (ooh, Rupp jokes, really going for the tough targets, eh?) but I certainly didn't find it offensive, either. I went back and read some of the author's other stuff and thought the non-parody attempts were better. I'm not sure what I think is worse, though-- the people who are raving about this, or the people who got all ruffled up at what is obvious satire. |
| Lazlo |
| ||
|
I'm not sure the blogger is the same voice as the autthor,Dr. RVT. |
| Versus |
| ||
|
Word in the French gutter is that Dr. RVT will be sending a piece from Europe tomorrow morning. |
| deleuze |
| ||
|
Just got the piece in. Dr. RVT responds to his critics, living large at the Tour de France. http://thelogicoflongdistance.blogspot.com/2012/07/decadent-et-deprave-living-large-at.html |