Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
wejo
co-founder
Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 2:05PM Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Updated: Gabriele Anderson has been reinstated into the final

Gabriele Anderson, the cancer survivor, who finished second in heat 2 of the women's 1500m semifinal has been DQd.

I heard this second hand at a bar but supposedly there was some contact with a lap to go. Anderson was bumped into Amy Mortimer and a protest was filed resulting in the Anderson DQ.

Anderson will be appealing the DQ in the morning.

As a result of the DQ, Alice Schmidt (not Amy Mortimer) who did not originally make the final has been added to the final as that moved Schmidt up to the 5th automatic qualifying spot.

The final is not until Sunday.

Updated: Gabriele Anderson has been reinstated into the final

Update: Video of Alleged Foul

RRW Article on DQ


New results:
1 Shannon Rowbury Nike 4:09.96 Q
2 Katherine Mackey Brooks 4:10.54 Q
3 Sara Vaughn Nike 4:10.57 Q
4 Sarah Bowman New Balance 4:10.65 Q
5 Alice Schmidt Nike 4:10.94 Q
6 Amy Mortimer Saucony 4:12.04
7 Kate Grace Oiselle / New Jersey New York 4:12.92
8 Phoebe Wright Nike 4:13.65
9 Heather Kampf Asics / Team USA Minnesota 4:14.03
10 Jordan Hasay Oregon 4:15.52
11 Melissa Salerno New Balance 4:16.33
DQ Gabriele Anderson Brooks / Team USA Minnesota


Original results:
1 Shannon Rowbury Nike 4:09.96 Q
2 Gabriele Anderson Brooks / Team USA Minnesota 4:10.08 Q
3 Katherine Mackey Brooks 4:10.54 Q
4 Sara Vaughn Nike 4:10.57 Q
5 Sarah Bowman New Balance 4:10.65 Q
6 Alice Schmidt Nike 4:10.94
7 Amy Mortimer Saucony 4:12.04
8 Kate Grace Oiselle / New Jersey New York 4:12.92
9 Phoebe Wright Nike 4:13.65
10 Heather Kampf Asics / Team USA Minnesota 4:14.03
11 Jordan Hasay Oregon 4:15.52
12 Melissa Salerno New Balance 4:16.33
Lorenzo the Magnificent
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 6:13AM - in reply to wejo Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
That's a long ways out to DQ someone based on "contact." Is the replay available?
Grow up
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 6:37AM - in reply to Lorenzo the Magnificent Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
When your source is "I heard this in a bar" you might want to wait to post until you have some actual proof. The start list hasn't changed and most likely you are wrong and starting controversy over some drunken rumor your heard from someone trying to pretend they are more important than they really are.
Frank Reynolds
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 6:43AM - in reply to Grow up Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Grow up wrote:

When your source is "I heard this in a bar" you might want to wait to post until you have some actual proof. The start list hasn't changed and most likely you are wrong and starting controversy over some drunken rumor your heard from someone trying to pretend they are more important than they really are.


THIS
Ax
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 6:49AM - in reply to Grow up Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Grow up wrote:

starting controversy over some drunken rumor your heard from someone trying to pretend they are more important than they really are.


You mean he met a kindred spirit?
Tigerfan
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 6:50AM - in reply to Frank Reynolds Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
However the official results which I just checked show the DQ!
Kanye North
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 7:03AM - in reply to Tigerfan Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Tigerfan wrote:

However the official results which I just checked show the DQ!


Yup.

Score one for Wejo's drunken insights.
whirledpeas
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 7:20AM - in reply to wejo Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
as soon as they crossed the line and headed into the last lap, anderson was boxed inside with mortimer right next to her outside. anderson made an aggressive and blatant attempt with her right arm to shove mortimer out wide in order to create a space to move out and around the runner ahead of her and mortimer at her side. there was definite pushing by anderson, but mortimer stood her ground and pushed back, maintaining her rightful position. anderson relented and took another avenue to the inside, which was eventually successful.
but the contact did knock mortimer off her stride a bit and impeded her movement for a few seconds, which did alter her race intentions which she was attempting to carry out at a very critical time.
anderson had absolutely no lane to get around mortimer, and she was trying to shove her to the side. she wasn't trying to squeeze through or feather her way through a tight spot, it was about a second of hand-to-hand combat and anderson was clearly in the wrong. mortimer got knocked off her stride and had to pull her attention away from the race momentarily. that, no doubt, had a negative impact on her finishing drive. maybe not a great impact, but it had significance.
per rule, anderson deserves the DQ, and has no grounds for overturning it.
runnerchick
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 7:27AM - in reply to Frank Reynolds Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
WHAT???
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 8:02AM - in reply to whirledpeas Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
That contact was nothing and a regular part of racing.... There is no way that had any influence in the slightest on why she did not make the final. She's a veteran and has raced in Europe many times so I can't believe that she thought that was worthy of a protest.
nyloco
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 8:05AM - in reply to Frank Reynolds Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
It seems pretty clear to me, but I have a reading comprehension above 7th grade. Wejo first heard the rumor in a bar and took the initiative to look up the results before posting. He posted the original and updated results, directly from the USATF site, with the latter verifying the rumor he heard.



Frank Reynolds wrote:

[quote]Grow up wrote:

When your source is "I heard this in a bar" you might want to wait to post until you have some actual proof. The start list hasn't changed and most likely you are wrong and starting controversy over some drunken rumor your heard from someone trying to pretend they are more important than they really are.


THIS[/quote]
Caught the second time
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 8:30AM - in reply to nyloco Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Uceny complained about Anderson trying to push her way between her and Mackey in the prelim round. Anderson admitted this on a video interview too.

Sounds like she got even more aggressive in round 2.
view from a condom salesman.
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 8:33AM - in reply to runnerchick Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I'm betting an official gave weldon a heads up but asked not to be quoted before the announcement was official .


I'll not go into "overhearing" things like The Paris Rejection sending NS into the arms of a local track groupie.
Bulldozer
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 8:42AM - in reply to view from a condom salesman. Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Stating the obvious
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 8:42AM - in reply to wejo Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
The girl is a 2 time cancer survivor!
Like Lance, I think you gotta give her a pass on this one!
I'm just sayin'
Boston33
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 8:43AM - in reply to view from a condom salesman. Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I am surprised as the contact didn't appear to be anything we don't see in bunched races routinely. Maybe Uceny pointing it out did alert officials as suggested above.

Could someone explain why Mortimer is also not allowed to advance given she was the person affected by the foul? I understand why they'd give it to Schmidt, but why not both?
view from a condom salesman.
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 9:01AM - in reply to Boston33 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Sadly the rules direct behaviour peramiters and are not designed to assist the injured party.
reinstate
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 9:01AM - in reply to whirledpeas Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Mortimer was in lane 2 on the straight and cut into lane 1 on Anderson on the curve. It was Anderson who was holding her position when Mortimer leaned on her. Still, no one was impeded, no one fell or was stepped on, no flag was raised, no one's stride was even altered. It was a competitive, physical race (as is the nature of 1500 semis) but all the runners had a fair shot and the best ones qualified. Anderson should be reinstated.
view from a condom salesman.
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 9:05AM - in reply to wejo Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Is the protest period over? Could we see a reversal?
reinstate
RE: Gabriele Anderson DQd, Alice Schmidt Put in Final 6/30/2012 9:08AM - in reply to Boston33 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Mortimer was not fouled. She had a clean run for the finish at all times but was just not fast enough.
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |