Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Middle Distance Coach
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 3:07PM - in reply to ru a genius? Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

ru a genius? wrote:

[quote]Middle Distance Coach wrote:

I would be more encouraged if it had been 3:35 and 13:45.


So you're saying that a faster time would be more encouraging? Are you, like, some kind of genius or something? Would you also say that 3:34 and 13:44 would be more encouraging than 3:35 and 13:45? How about 3:33 and 13:43?[/quote]

Don't be an ass. My point was clear to anyone that has half a brain.
uhhhh........
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 4:00PM - in reply to Middle Distance Coach Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Your point was so obvious that everyone with half a brain is wondering why you bothered.
mileage man
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 4:09PM - in reply to uhhhh........ Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I took Middle Distance Coach to be saying that 3:43 still isn't all that great, so the level of excitement is unwarranted. Rather than just stating a tautology, as many seem to be assuming.

But I'm with the people who find this an exciting sign of things to come. I'm really confident he can make the trials. I think he might be a long-shot for the team, but I'll be rooting for him.
52.43
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 4:15PM - in reply to mileage man Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Does anybody know, is it correct that he just had 6minutes between the races?! I think they said so in the video.
Don B.
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 4:46PM - in reply to Here is a thought for you Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Coach Mike Banks (of Georgetown) won the 1500 in the equivalent of a 4-minute mile. I hear he wants to challenge RoJo in a coach's race;-)
critic 100
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 6:10PM - in reply to joecrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Isn't Webb a professional? His times wouldn't qualify for the NCAA Championship meet...
Tough Road
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 6:14PM - in reply to critic 100 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
3:43:00 is the b-standard for the Oly trials , 3:39 for the a , he is close
livelikeaballer
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 6:30PM - in reply to 52.43 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
They said sixty minutes, not six.
2005 and all that
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 6:41PM - in reply to livelikeaballer Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Once Alan is fit enough to lay down a sub 13 second 100 halfway through a 1500, watch out world.
Wrongway Willie
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 6:53PM - in reply to 2005 and all that Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

2005 and all that wrote:

Once Alan is fit enough to lay down a sub 13 second 100 halfway through a 1500, watch out world.


Not gonna happen at 30yrs old.
Cantegg
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 7:11PM - in reply to Wrongway Willie Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Good thing he isn't 30
Alan Arkin
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 7:58PM - in reply to lane 2 runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
3:43 is only encouraging because of how bad he was running before...14:15 better have been a threshold effort if he's "back." 100 guys in division I could have duplicated this...
Nah nah
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 8:24PM - in reply to Wrongway Willie Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Wrongway Willie wrote:

[quote]2005 and all that wrote:

Once Alan is fit enough to lay down a sub 13 second 100 halfway through a 1500, watch out world.


Not gonna happen at 30yrs old.[/quote]


Why not? What happens at 30?
Mrr82
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 8:59PM - in reply to Alan Arkin Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Alan Arkin wrote:

3:43 is only encouraging because of how bad he was running before...14:15 better have been a threshold effort if he's "back." 100 guys in division I could have duplicated this...


Really? 100 guys could go 3:43.28 and then run a 14:15 60 mins later? College running is in a better state than i thought.
joecrunner
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 10:09PM - in reply to Mrr82 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
In case anyone is curious, 3:43 is equal to 13:46 for a 5k and Webb's last 1600 was 4:23.
watched the race
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 10:17PM - in reply to joecrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Webb looked fat.
Kurt5
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 10:20PM - in reply to watched the race Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Is Webb's strategy to race every week to get more comfortable with races? If so, I don't think it would be reasonable to expect him to go all out in every single race or he might burn himself out.
right back at you
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 10:23PM - in reply to watched the race Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

watched the race wrote:

Webb looked fat.


You look fat.
kjp26-00
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/15/2012 11:59PM - in reply to watched the race Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I saw him do this in person, what a lot of people might not realize is that the time elapsed between his 1500 and 5K wasn't all that much. Less than an hour I believe. He looked reasonable out there (not like he must have last week) but he did not look world class as of April.
boytickler
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/16/2012 12:10AM - in reply to kjp26-00 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
JOECRUNNER has HPV
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |