Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
HRE
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/12/2012 9:58PM - in reply to time out rob Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
He did say that. It's been several years since we spoke so I may not have his exact words. The original interview went down in a computer crash, but I asked him if there was anything he'd change if he could do it over again. His answer was that he thought he'd gotten it right the first time except that during the base phase he would add one fairly casual weekly session of something like 10x330 or 440 rather than becoming "purely a distance runner." He didn't think it would detract from the base building and that it would have been useful to have a little faster work.
Not Me
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/13/2012 12:57AM - in reply to Renato Canova Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I just want to say that gypsy has done more damage to Lydiardism than anyone could imagine. The Foundation should sue him.

That is all.
the 99 percent
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/13/2012 1:33AM - in reply to 65756gfhfd Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

65756gfhfd wrote:
Is anybody else just skimming this thread every few days to see if Renato has posted again, ignoring JR and gypsy and all the other wackos?


yes!
yeah, that's right
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/13/2012 2:30AM - in reply to 65756gfhfd Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

65756gfhfd wrote:

Is anybody else just skimming this thread every few days to see if Renato has posted again, ignoring JR and gypsy and all the other wackos?


yah, man.
Californication
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/13/2012 11:38AM - in reply to HRE Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Barry Magee. What he says ?
really think so?
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/13/2012 11:50AM - in reply to Not Me Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Not Me wrote:I just want to say that gypsy has done more damage to Lydiardism than anyone could imagine. The Foundation should sue him.

That is all.
First, I think Canova has been the primary target of gypsy's mouth-foaming rants. But second, and more importantly, I think it would be necessary for somebody reading the thread to take him seriously for him to have done any damage to anyone, no?

BTW - that Chris?
ggg
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/13/2012 1:40PM - in reply to Not Me Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Silly American lawyers can, thank goodness, not sue him
as this is NZ juristiction.
rekrunner
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/13/2012 7:15PM - in reply to Not Me Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Maybe you should say a little more. Are you a lawyer?
How is "Lydiardism" protected by law?
What did "gypsy" do to damage Lydiardism, at all, let alone beyond anyone's imagination?
How much damage did "gypsy" due to "Lydiardism"?
Does the "Lydiard Foundation" have standing to sue?
On what grounds should the Foundation sue "gypsy"?
In which country, and court, will this lawsuit be appropriate? Which court has jurisdiction? NZ? US? Australia?
Why isn't "gypsy's" freedom of speech protected by law?

Generally speaking:
- "gypsy" recommends the Lydiard way, and acts as a salesman and a spokesman for Lydiard. Do you think the "Foundation" has grounds to sue, on the basis of incompetence of an unpaid spokesman?
- if anything, "gypsy" has abandoned any hope of popularity, for his "unique" interpretations of the success of Renato Canova's methods, and its alleged costs for the longterm career of any athlete unlucky enough to be coached by Renato. If anyone has been damaged, it's Renato, but then again, in countries that allow opinions and free speech, there doesn't seem to be enough grounds for a lawsuit.


Not Me wrote:

I just want to say that gypsy has done more damage to Lydiardism than anyone could imagine. The Foundation should sue him.

That is all.
HRE
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/13/2012 8:32PM - in reply to rekrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
The Lydiard Foundation does in fact have standing to sue. In his will, Arthur willed his intellectual property to Nobby. I very much doubt it would happen, but yes, LF does have standing to sue.
ggg
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/13/2012 9:28PM - in reply to rekrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Gypsy may or may not be silly, but the idea of a lawsuit is
even sillier. what intellectual properties? To coach
in a certain way? Should I pay royalties if I include a
hill phase in the spring?
SlowFatMaster
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/13/2012 10:22PM - in reply to Renato Canova Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Renato:

Thanks for the information on the LT of various 800 runners.

Do you think that one week is enough time after the 3 x 600 workout to run a PB in the 800? It obviously worked for Fiasconaro but would you do things differently today?

I would love it if you had some samples of Leonard Kosencha's training to share.
hyvyvvyvb
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/14/2012 3:09AM - in reply to HRE Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Did you ever seen that that attorney ?
Intellectual property is confined to be the owner of authorship and copywrite.
After some decades, copywrite is dead.
Intellectual property does not include the comment and opinion on what is published or was been said.

Everyone could be sued by comment on other training. When the Lydiardists did comment on other coaches might be sued as well ?
time out rob
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/14/2012 4:03AM - in reply to hyvyvvyvb Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
is that you , Antonio?


hyvyvvyvb wrote:

Did you ever seen that that attorney ?
Intellectual property is confined to be the owner of authorship and copywrite.
After some decades, copywrite is dead.
Intellectual property does not include the comment and opinion on what is published or was been said.

Everyone could be sued by comment on other training. When the Lydiardists did comment on other coaches might be sued as well ?
gypsy
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/14/2012 4:12AM - in reply to time out rob Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

time out rob wrote:

is that you , Antonio?

[quote]hyvyvvyvb wrote:

Did you ever seen that that attorney ?
Intellectual property is confined to be the owner of authorship and copywrite.
After some decades, copywrite is dead.
Intellectual property does not include the comment and opinion on what is published or was been said.

Everyone could be sued by comment on other training. When the Lydiardists did comment on other coaches might be sued as well ?
[/quote]

Of course it is. He is making many comments under different names in this thread. This is just one of the more obvious ones.

To think, to seriously believe that I could have any affect on Lydiardism, Lydiard, Lydiard's ideas etc is ludicrious. Who am i to make even the smallest dent in the influence of Lydiardism. Besides i am a strong proponent of Lydiardism and i am free to reinterpret things as i see fit. Am i right? And i'm free to convince MD runners to take a look at the longer term and to think about building their mileage over a number of years and to minimise the amount of 'burning' training they are doing etc etc, which fit in line with Lydiardism, i believe.
energy systems
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/14/2012 4:13AM - in reply to Renato Canova Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Dear Renato
This is very interesting. Do you have an observation on Seb Coe in this context - I am aware you had contact with Seb while training in Italy I think? His father applied the training to the energy demands of the event as understood at the time. If one had a young athlete with an interest in the 800 but with a difference between LT and pb in 800 of 7263km/h in which direction should his training go?


Renato Canova wrote:

I don't want to waste my time replying somebody as Gypsy that doesn't want to understand any other option but Soviet periodization (now no longer used by Russian coaches...) and Lydiard, mixing marathon with decathlon.

But one thing I want to clarify for the knowledge of everybody. IT'S NOT TRUE THAT 800m ARE AN EVENT BASED ON 60% AEROBIC AND 40% ANAEROBIC.

One of the biggest mistakes of the past, that of course all the coaches looking at the past only continue to do, is TO THINK THE PERCENTAGES OF AEROBIC/ANAEROBIC ARE CONNECTED WITH THE EVENT.

The percentages, instead, are connected with THE ATHLETE.

I want to gice you practical examples.

In Italy, we had 4 athletes running under 1:44 in their career : MARCELLO FIASCONARO (1'43"7, WR in 1973), ANDREA LONGO (1'43"74), ANDREA BENVENUTI (European Champion 1994, 1'43"92) and GIUSEPPE D'URSO (silver medal in WCH 1993, 1'43"95). So, practically the same performance (incidentally, all better than Peter Snell's PB...).

Fiasconaro came from 400m, he won silver medal in European Champs 1971 in Helsinki (45"49), with a background as Rugby player. When he came Italy from South Africa, the head coach for 400m was Salvatore Morale (WR holder of 400 hs with 49"2 in Belgrade 1962), and I was his assistant. Fiasconaro NEVER ran longer than 30' easy, and started running 50' at easy pace only during his first training camp, before ECh, in Abetone, together with me. I told him "you can be resistant, and if you increase your endurance you can become one of the top three 800m runners in the world". He answered "I never will run 800m", but at the beginning of 1972 he ran his first 800 winning in Italy with 1'47"7. After, he had a stress fracture in one foot (staying in Formia, with a tartan track, because he was used to train on grass tracks in RSA, or on cinder tracks in Torino), and had to stop training for 3 full months. He started again from December 1972 to train in RSA, running a little bit more on golf fields, and moved to 800m, running immediately 1'45"8, and after one month 1'44"8. After he came Italy, and I followed his training in Torino. We organised for him 3 sessions per week with long run in the morning on the golf fields in La Mandria, one of warm-up + 30' fast, one of 1 hr moderate, one of 45' with variations of speed. This was the support he had ALREADY IN FULL SEASON, and we used this TOGETHER his basic lactic training. Also during the last two weeks before bettering the WR in Milan, we went for this schedule of long run SUPPORTING his best specific workout, one week before the WR : 3 times 600m (recovery 12') in 1'18"7 / 1'19"1 / 1'18"6.
Fiasconaro had the Lactic Threshold (LT) at a speed of 17,220 km/h in 1971, and of 18,250 before his WR. The speed of his WR was 27,772 km/h.

GIUDSEPPE D'URSO was the Italian Youth Champion in 2000m steeple. He was aerobically strong. In 1993, two months before his silver medal, his LT was at 20,850 km/h.
The speed of his PB was 27,705 km/h.

ANDREA BENVENUTI has a PB in 400m of 46"7, was a really specialist from the beginning of his career. In 1994, his LT was at 19,330, and the speed of his PB was 27,720 km/h.

ANDREA LONGO was a very heavy athlete, with great muscle power (when was young, somebody in Italian Federation thought for him was better to try to become a javelin thrower...). He NEVER used long run, but specifically he grew with his coach (Scapin) using interval training and intermittent training. At his best, he had a LT of 18,450 while the speed of his PB was, as Fiasconaro, 27,766 km/h.

Now, we can have a very simple calculation, LOOKING AT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SPEED OF LT AND THE SPEED OF THEIR PERFORMANCES :

Fiasconaro 17,220 27,772 10,552
Benvenuti 19,330 27,720 8,490
D'Urso 20,850 27,705 6,855
Longo 18,450 27,766 9,316

It's clear that HIGHER IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LT AND SPEED OF THE COMPETITION, HIGHER IS THE PERCENTAGE OF INTERVENTION OF THE LACTIC SYSTEM IN THE PERFORMANCE.

This because THE ATHLETES ARFE DIFFERENT. Somebody can remember the thread of Antonio Cabral and John Hadd about the TWO DIFFERENT TYPOLOGIES OF ATHLETES FOR THE SAME EVENT (fast and resistant), and this happens FOR ALL THE DISTANCES. In any case, FAST athletes have a higher percentage of Fast Fibers, Resistant lower percentage.

This shows without any doubt that the idea to have a training for an event is something completely wrong. Of course, to increase the personal aerobic ability is something very important for every kind of athletes : however, to decide that the percentage of Aerobic in 800m is 60% IN DOGMATIC WAY shows clearly that who believes in this HOLY numbers doesn't have any connection with the reality.

Apart Snell, the 95% of the best 800m runners in the world NEVER used Marathon Training. We can discuss about the ability of Lydiard in training the athletes (without any doubt he was a great coach), but we cant think that this is the best training system when we speak about 800m.

And personally I think that if Snell could have another type of training he had the talent for running 1'42", and absolutely 3'26" in 1500m, where he never was really specifically prepared.
rekrunner
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/14/2012 5:39AM - in reply to HRE Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Yeah, I'm aware of some transfer in Lydiard's will to the Foundation. I guess I'm just trying to figure out what shape a lawsuit would take, which really involves the next question, on what grounds would they sue? (Actually it involves answering all the questions.) When you think about it (or when I think about it), the whole idea of a lawsuit is fundamentally wrong on 3 or 4 levels.

If the claim is slander or defamation, I doubt that the right to sue transfers with the intellectual property of Lydiard. This right, if it still exists, probably belongs to living family members.

And I think we are not talking about infringement of copyrights, patents, or trademarks, or divulging trade secrets. Offering opinions in a forum is something usually protected by free speech laws. Such commentary is not usually considered infringing, even if it includes some direct copying of the subject being commented, which is not the case here.

It's hard to imagine that "Lydiardism" is protected by any intellectual property law, to the point where it could chill criticism. Otherwise, the "Foundation" would have found a way to issue a gag order on Antonio a long time ago.

And again, gypsy always argues in favor of Lydiardism, as a superior expression of the Soviet periodization he grew up with. In what form did this alleged damage appear? Is there an unwritten allegation that "gypsy" is somehow incompetent, and that his positive support of Lydiardism can actually be viewed as damaging, by association? Maybe now "gypsy" has grounds to sue, for this kind of personal attack on his character.

And then there is the question of damages. Did the Foundation suffer any damage?

So to the one who just wanted to say that the Foundation should sue "gypsy" for all the damage he caused to Lydiardism, it seems like that wasn't thought through at all.

It seems that if anyone was "damaged", it's Renato Canova. But even insulting, unpopular speech is protected by "free speech" laws, if it's simply gypsy's opinion, and not slanderous or defaming.


HRE wrote:

The Lydiard Foundation does in fact have standing to sue. In his will, Arthur willed his intellectual property to Nobby. I very much doubt it would happen, but yes, LF does have standing to sue.
Renato Canova
Coach
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/14/2012 5:54AM - in reply to gypsy Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Gypsy, this is another demonstration of your not honesty.

Another athlete with me from 2006, already with good talent, now at 7th year of training together : EDWIN SOI.

He won bronze medal in 5000 in OG 2008, won African Championships in 2010, and won bronze medal in World Indoor in 3000m 3 days ago. His career :

2004 3'46"92 / 7'56"3 / 13'22"57
2005 3'44"76 / 7'44"97 / 13'10"78

(he came under my training at the end of the season)

2006 7'31"84 / 12'52"40 / 27'14"83
2007 7'34"07 / 13'10"21
2008 7'31"83 / 13'06"22
2009 7'31"48 / 12'55"03
2010 7'29"75 / 12'58"91
2011 7'27"55 / 12'59"15
2012 7'29"94i

Average his best 10 performances (3000, 2006/2012) : 7'31"179

Average hus best 10 performances (5000, 2006/2012) :
13'01"179

But, of course, everything was wrong, because Edwin didn't improve in 1500m, that was his first event....
Jackanory
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/14/2012 7:20AM - in reply to gypsy Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

gypsy wrote:

[quote]time out rob wrote:

is that you , Antonio?

[quote)

Of course it is. He is making many comments under different names in this thread. This is just one of the more obvious ones.




Now we can add paranoia to stupidity & intellectual disonhesty.
time out rob
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/14/2012 7:48AM - in reply to rekrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
rekrunner,
nobody cares.
HRE
RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable 3/14/2012 9:40AM - in reply to rekrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
All I was doing was answering your question about whether the LF has any legal standing to sue anyone. They do and evidently you knew that when you asked the question which makes me wonder why you asked that.
Whether they'd ever do it, who it would be, why they'd do it, how they'd do it, where the suit would be filed, is just chatter from people here who seem to get overly worked up when Arthur's name gets into a thread title.
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |