No on the rings if you didn't make the team.
Also, if I ran 2:05 I might get that tattooed on my forehead!
Josh Cox got a "Botson" tattoo.
No on the rings if you didn't make the team.
Also, if I ran 2:05 I might get that tattooed on my forehead!
Josh Cox got a "Botson" tattoo.
great success wrote:
what do you guys and gals think of small olympic rings tattoo for someone who qualifies for the Trials but not an olympic team?
no, no, no. it doesnt matter what the achievement is - the very act of getting a tattoo done in order to solicit praise / ego-boosts, etc is utter vanity. people who do this should really get over themselves - it's the same mentality as getting a bumper sticker for your car just because your f***ing child learned to read....
I live in Watertown and ran the trials in 1980 in Buffalo. Yes, I was one of the 56 under 2:20.
I know you do not believe me.
P.Whelan wrote:
If you think you want it, get it. It does not matter if other people like it, tattoos are not for other people, they are for you.
I will qualify that a bit with my personal taste. If I saw somebody with that tattoo I would think the follow things
1. That dude has a calf tattoo
2. Calf tattoos are gay
3. That dude is gay
Calf tattoos are only okay if you have like, 85%+ of your upper body covered in tattoos.
Isn't the Boston marathon logo a unicorn? Also gay.
Jay Yell wrote:
Agreed. There is nothing I can think of as more douchey!
Clark Griswold wrote:I couldn't have said this any better....
Another vote for twat-douche. You will realize your doucery about 3 days after you get the tattoo. If you are a douche then go ahead and do it, chances are the people that notice the ink thought the same of you before they saw it.