Brian wrote:
"People like me are adapted for the high heat and humidity so our bodies will not lose salt like someone who is not adapted to our conditions."
I am from Atlanta and grew up in the south and have always hated and performed badly in the heat and always liked and performed well in the cold. The main factor of heat vs. cold tolerance is probably ratio of weight to body surface area. Sure, I get acclimated for me after a few weeks, but no amount of running in the heat makes me do well in it compared to others. Meanwhile, when I moved to North Dakota yeas ago, I ran in far fewer clothes than the natives.
Brian, you are correct.
You're balancing heat production, which is proportional to body mass, against heat dissipation, which is proportional to surface area. Since mass(volume) increases with the cube of the radius, and surface area only increases with the square of the radius, it should be clear that weight (and heat production) will increase faster than the heat dissipation properties afforded by surface area.
Additionally, much of heat dissipation occurs in at the top surface of the body, the head and shoulders, which also contains the organ of the body (the brain) which is most affected by heat.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11211124&dopt=AbstractAdvantages of smaller body mass during distance running in warm, humid environments.
Marino FE, Mbambo Z, Kortekaas E, Wilson G, Lambert MI, Noakes TD, Dennis SC.
Human Movement Studies Unit, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia.
fmarino@csu.edu.auThe purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which lighter runners might be more advantaged than larger, heavier runners during prolonged running in warm humid conditions. Sixteen highly trained runners with a range of body masses (55-90 kg) ran on a motorised treadmill on three separate occasions at 15, 25 or 35 degrees C, 60% relative humidity and 15 km x h(-1) wind speed. The protocol consisted of a 30-min run at 70% peak treadmill running speed (sub-max) followed by a self-paced 8-km performance run. At the end of the submax and 8-km run, rectal temperature was higher at 35 degrees C (39.5+/-0.4 degrees C, P<0.05) compared with 15 degrees C (38.6+/-0.4 degrees C) and 25 degrees C (39.1+/-0.4 degrees C) conditions. Time to complete the 8-km run at 35 degrees C was 30.4+/-2.9 min (P<0.05) compared with 27.0+/-1.5 min at 15 degrees C and 27.4+/-1.5 min at 25 degrees C. Heat storage determined from rectal and mean skin temperatures was positively correlated with body mass (r=0.74, P<0.0008) at 35 degrees C but only moderately correlated at 25 degrees C (r=0.50, P<0.04), whereas no correlation was evident at 15 degrees C. Potential evaporation estimated from sweat rates was positively associated with body mass (r=0.71, P<0.002) at 35 degrees C. In addition, the decreased rate of heat production and mean running speed during the 8-km performance run were significantly correlated with body mass (r=-0.61, P<0.02 and r=-0.77, P<0.0004, respectively). It is concluded that, compared to heavier runners, those with a lower body mass have a distinct thermal advantage when running in conditions in which heat-dissipation mechanisms are at their limit. Lighter runners produce and store less heat at the same running speed; hence they can run faster or further before reaching a limiting rectal temperature.
PMID: 11211124 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
----------------------------------
For purposes of thermal comfort analysis, skin surface area can be estimated using the following formula (the Dubois surface area):
A= 0.202*M^0.425*L^0.725
Where A is surface area [m^2], M is mass [kg], and L is height [m]
or
A= 0.108*M^0.425*L^0.725
Where A is surface area [ft^2], M is mass [lbm], and L is height [in]
According to this scaling law, doubling weight increases skin surface by 34%.