| Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 | 251 | 252 | 253 | 254 | 255 | |
| kirkaz |
| ||
I think we know he mustve gotten a car ride, taken the "T" train, rode a bike, or something of that nature. But Boston is a very difficult place to do that. The course is point to point, and it's got electronic checkpoints every 5 kilometers. It takes some pretty careful planning to consistently hit close to all of them in the range of 6:25/mile or so. Car scenario: Boston marathon is closed to traffic. It's extremely crowded. Bike scenario: very possible. T train scenario: unlikely because you'd probably end up going slower than the runners due to the high foot traffic surrounding the entire marathon area. when you use any of these basic methods of transportation, do you arrive early and then stand around like a nonrunner looking at your watch and wait around a few minutes until the 5k interval (next checkpoint) is close to 20:00 or so and then cross the electronic timing mat? Possible but one wrong move and you screw up your pacing pretty easily. And the timing mats are supposed to be very sensitive as well. |
| Trollist |
| ||
No. It's not just me. |
| Cocoa Puffs |
| ||
|
bike senario is easy. I've watched it many times and biked the streets. without a number on no one is looking at you or cares, as why would they? then bike to another checkpoint, knowing approximately what time that you have to get there and walk across as you're looking backwards for a friend to come by, or whatever. how to combat this, easy!!!! Every checkpoint should have spotters, over a dozen of them. If anyone gets near the mats and has no number, yell out to them and stop them. The spotters are on the ground in front of the mats. If someone is brazen enough, grab them and see if they have a number (get that number!!!!!) Make them expose their number or take their number off just like they have the right to do if you're in the wrong coral at the start. he did it like I just said above and the picture that someone posted early on proves it. he could have had a rented car at a certain point and then abandoned the bike....aka left it wherever as it happens every year...too many bikes as they are everywhere. |
| Cocoa Puffs |
| ||
|
also, take a picture of them and have video showing the whole mat. if he cheated and crossed those mats, it has to be on the video crossing or whoever actually had the chip on their shoe. piece of cake. |
| Hmmmmmm |
| ||
|
Try Googling for the term Argument from personal incredulity Its what you and others are apparently doing. |
| Kirkaz |
| ||
This seems like a great idea, but they should make sure the mat isn't so sensitive that if you just go near it it will register. Ouch1000 pointed out how the mats are so sensitive that race staff setting up the start line set it off a bunch of times by mistake with a chip in the guy's pocket (wasn't on shoe or bib) |
| Lone gunman |
| ||
|
Too much unresearched conjecture on this thread. If I wanted to try to game the Boston marathon, here's what I think I would do. This took me 20 minutes to figure out. First - download the instructions that the volunteer checkpoint people get: Here is a 2010 link for the volunteers. About 7/8th of the way down the document it lists precisely where the mats are. An interesting note, the checkpoint people are at every 5M, not at the 5K mats. There are there to manually document the first 100 male and female leaders to then later reconcile their times with the mat times, that's it. Everyone else is not tracked for all intents and purposes. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0BrfinYVelHNzVlMzEyOTItMTY1OS00MmIwLTk5OWEtMjg1NGM2NjgyZjQ2/edit?pli=1 Second, download a googlemap version of the course. http://www.mapmyrun.com/routes/fullscreen/143368/ Third - run the first half normally. The first half of the race is very easy. 95% of people go out too hard and fade. Not that hard to do. Fourth - bail out somewhere after the half marathon split, take a bike or ride (motorbike?) on to rt 9 and hit the 25K mat at the corner of hillside road. Back on ride to the 30K by getting back onto rt 9 and cutting up Chestnut st. Back to bike, back down chestnut and onto Beacon st where I would cut thru some small road by BC and hit the 35K. Cut down to Boylston st and then Brookline ave and up a side st to then hit the 40K. Run the rest. Get bike, if applicable, later. I have no idea if that would really work with road closures etc but it might. It's not rocket science. Again, 20 minutes. |
| MarathonMind |
| ||
|
Your plan may work but not the way you describe because Rte. 9 doesn't allow you to make left turns. If you are headed east you will need an interchange with an overpass to get north of 9. You would have to use the route below which assumes two things: 1. You can park your car in the Wellelsey MBTA lot which is 300 meters from the half mat. Also assume two minutes to get to it and get it started up. 2. You can get your car close enough to the 25k point on Walnut Street for another 300 meter walk/jog to the mat, again allowing two minutes for transition. The huge assumption here is that you can leave your car parked on the street or in someone's driveway for two or three minutes. Both of these transition points give you about 12 minutes to make the drive between 21.1 and 25k. He split this in 16:48 in 2010. Google says 11 minutes, but I have no idea what traffic conditions actually allow on Marathon Monday. I would assume it's much slower then. http://maps.google.com/maps?saddr=Linden+St&daddr=42.30814,-71.28065+to:42.3162881,-71.2467763+to:Walnut+St&hl=en&ll=42.311275,-71.27655&spn=0.054078,0.09407&sll=42.313084,-71.265435&sspn=0.027038,0.047035&geocode=FcBohQIdCB7A-w%3BFSyShQId9lfA-ynDoQpnUYHjiTEok3QJ9GLe-w%3BFQCyhQIdSNzA-ykl75uR0YPjiTGVR1ey8uqqDA%3BFWzAhQIdqJvA-w&t=h&mra=dvme&mrsp=2&sz=15&via=1,2&z=14 He may very well have done this in 2009, but it cost him because it took two minutes longer- 18:47 that year. I think he did something different in 2010. |
| JOKM |
| ||
Occam's Razor. He didn't cheat. |
| MarathonMind |
| ||
|
Really dude? How do you explain this? http://jimrhoades.com/10/boston/30k/image705.html Does that really look like the stride of a guy running a 19:42 split? Did he really average 6:20 miles up two of the Newton Hills? My Occam's Razor tells me something else. |
| The easy way |
| ||
|
Highly unlikely in 2010 he ran the first half and then pulled a ghost routine. The splits at 15k, 20k and 1/2 all indicate a 2:55ish marathon. At that point it would be easiest to just keep going & finish out the race legit. The bodies of water on both sides of the 15k area prevents any reasonable cutting opportunities, except if you were a 4-5 hour pace jogger. The splits are so unusually realistic one could ALMOST believe they were real. Reservation for Copperfield? Copperfield?? |
| GK |
| ||
|
Exactly why I find it so interesting. If not for the pictures where it looks like he's jogging and the fact that he changed clothes then there would be no evidence to suggest that it wasn't a legit performance. |
| Hmmmmmm |
| ||
I think you misunderstand Occam's Razor "It is a principle urging one to select among competing hypotheses that which makes the fewest assumptions and thereby offers the simplest explanation of the effect." Nowhere does it say that you can't make any assumptions or that an unlikely assumption is as good as a likely one. We know he didn't run the whole race. The simplest assumption is that wheeled transport was used, people can trip over themselves by over complicating from now until Christmas speculating about what could and could not have been done - go out there and drive and bike it. Finally for the very stupid, we do know that roads were closed, we even know which ones http://www.boston.com/sports/marathon/course/streetclosings/ |
| Ever hear of Originality? |
| ||
|
Thanks as you just repeated what how many posters have said in the last 15 pages!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| broken record |
| ||
|
That picture has been discussed repeatedly. The answer...it can't be explained and he knows it. As someone posted a few pages ago, he didn't expect to show up in pictures and I agree with that person as it's now quite obvious. |
| pinapple chick |
| ||
|
If I were him and I was legit, I'd be on here defending myself and explaining. Sorry, you can't explain that away, impossible. Hidden bid, why? On the shoulder, head down, why? Etc...the hand was in the cookie jar and grandma was watching from the front room, but you didn't know it. |
| JOKM |
| ||
No you don't. |
| Hmmmmmm |
| ||
The photo you seem to have ignored on the previous page proves it, nobody running a race tries to hide on the course, instant DQ for concealed number, need I go on? |
| Haha yo (wow!!!!!) |
| ||
|
JOKM = Kip Litton!!!!! (scary I know!!! Dude still believes in his mind he ran those races!!!!!) |
| JOKM |
| ||
The photo you seem to have ignored on the previous page proves it, nobody running a race tries to hide on the course, instant DQ for concealed number, need I go on?[/quote] Look at the pictures of Boston 2007. Were all those runners who concealed his/her number get an "instant DQ?" No they didn't. Try again. |
| Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 | 251 | 252 | 253 | 254 | 255 | |