Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 | 251 | 252 | 253 | 254 | 255 |
anutter thought
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 7:10AM - in reply to YUP!!!!!! Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I agree with what he said, but it won't matter unless he gets caught again. Deny, deny, deny! Hitting the mats is not proof of innocence when your number is always covered and you don't show up on video or photos near the mats at the time you allegedly crossed them. How does one answer to that?
quick answerer 4 you
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 7:26AM - in reply to anutter thought Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Ummm...they can't?
who dey?
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 9:08AM - in reply to quick answerer 4 you Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Who registered Kip for the three marathons he did not run? Cowtown, Zoom Yah!, and Boston.

Was it one of the LR'ers?
Hmmmmmm
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 9:30AM - in reply to who dey? Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

who dey? wrote:

Who registered Kip for the three marathons he did not run? Cowtown, Zoom Yah!, and Boston.

Was it one of the LR'ers?

Occam's Razor and simple economics suggests Kip really
legger
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 9:38AM - in reply to Hmmmmmm Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Hmmmmmm wrote:

[quote]who dey? wrote:

Who registered Kip for the three marathons he did not run? Cowtown, Zoom Yah!, and Boston.

Was it one of the LR'ers?

Occam's Razor and simple economics suggests Kip really[/quote]

Why? There is only one Kip but more than one LR troll; Occam's Razor suggests then that it was a LRer who registered for those races, right?

I'm not defending Kip here, BTW, as the justification for all of his DQs is clear.
Not Kip
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 9:41AM - in reply to Hmmmmmm Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Hmmmmmm wrote:

[quote]who dey? wrote:

Who registered Kip for the three marathons he did not run? Cowtown, Zoom Yah!, and Boston.

Was it one of the LR'ers?

Occam's Razor and simple economics suggests Kip really[/quote]


I've thought about that too. I think Kip probably registered for Cowtown. I'm pretty sure the other two someone else registered using his name. Why would he run a small indoor marathon? It's not really his m.o. And why would he run Boston after not having run for a couple of years?
justsayin'
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 9:52AM - in reply to legger Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

legger wrote:

[quote]Hmmmmmm wrote:

[quote]who dey? wrote:

Who registered Kip for the three marathons he did not run? Cowtown, Zoom Yah!, and Boston.

Was it one of the LR'ers?

Occam's Razor and simple economics suggests Kip really[/quote]

Why? There is only one Kip but more than one LR troll; Occam's Razor suggests then that it was a LRer who registered for those races, right?

I'm not defending Kip here, BTW, as the justification for all of his DQs is clear.[/quote]


If you have an article coming out, the subject of your article won't talk to you, and he hasn't run since Dec 2010, wouldn't you want to create some buzz or try to get him to talk by denying he registered for these races?

-just sayin'

(no, not Kip. just another person who thinks he cheated)
diamonds are diamonds
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 10:01AM - in reply to justsayin' Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
"thinks"

Have you made up races that didn't exist?

Covered your bib as if you don't want to be linked to photos?

Started at the back and miraculously passed people though osmosis?

Came out of nowhere to suddenly be in front of people who you never passed?

HIt mats like a ghost, just enough for it to show you were there in the binary world, without actually physically appearing?

I don't need an article to "think" he did it or to even know how.

I'm not a fool as I know how he did it and it's nothing spectacular, but I couldn't sleep at night as I have a conscience.
barker dog44
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 10:16AM - in reply to diamonds are diamonds Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Yes, clearly cheated.

How much more evidence is needed. Spineless RD's. If they DQ him, what are his damages for any legal action, his name not showing up in results? Carry on.
Milrose
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 10:41AM - in reply to justsayin' Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

justsayin' wrote:

[quote]legger wrote:

[quote]Hmmmmmm wrote:

[quote]who dey? wrote:

Who registered Kip for the three marathons he did not run? Cowtown, Zoom Yah!, and Boston.

Was it one of the LR'ers?

Occam's Razor and simple economics suggests Kip really[/quote]

Why? There is only one Kip but more than one LR troll; Occam's Razor suggests then that it was a LRer who registered for those races, right?

I'm not defending Kip here, BTW, as the justification for all of his DQs is clear.[/quote]


If you have an article coming out, the subject of your article won't talk to you, and he hasn't run since Dec 2010, wouldn't you want to create some buzz or try to get him to talk by denying he registered for these races?

-just sayin'

(no, not Kip. just another person who thinks he cheated)[/quote]




Wasn't scotth the one who found out that KL was running Cow Town and Zoom yah????
angie's mist
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 11:00AM - in reply to Milrose Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Scott? I don't think so.
dukerdog
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 11:25AM - in reply to justsayin' Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
justsayin' wrote:
If you have an article coming out, the subject of your article won't talk to you, and he hasn't run since Dec 2010, wouldn't you want to create some buzz or try to get him to talk by denying he registered for these races?

And how would he have paid for it? I don't think he would risk his reputation by using a method that could potentially be traced back to him. All for a small bump of extra interest in the article.
Mr. Ace Ventura
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 11:46AM - in reply to dukerdog Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
It's highly unlikely that someone paid 150bucks to register kip for the 2012 Boston Marathon. Furthermore KIp I think actually told some people I think that he was going To run it. Why would he do that if someone else registered him?. Wouldnt he have instead told people that he did not register himself? Then of course he did not show up.. He was trying to shake off people from following him probably. That's a way of sending an FU to the writer and all of the letsrun detectives

One thing that is clear is that Kip did not register himself for the Boston University Valentine invitational in the mile- that was some college aged troll having some fun. Same thing with the Princeton invitational in the 1500 m. Hilarious troll seeded Kippy at 4:04 and his entry was accepted.
Milrose
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 11:55AM - in reply to angie's mist Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

angie's mist wrote:

Scott? I don't think so.



Why not?
Milrose
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 11:57AM - in reply to dukerdog Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

dukerdog wrote:

justsayin' wrote:
If you have an article coming out, the subject of your article won't talk to you, and he hasn't run since Dec 2010, wouldn't you want to create some buzz or try to get him to talk by denying he registered for these races?

And how would he have paid for it? I don't think he would risk his reputation by using a method that could potentially be traced back to him. All for a small bump of extra interest in the article.



I don't think it was the writer, but how would someone trace it back to him? I doubt the BAA or any RD would give up (or even retain) that information.
JOKM
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 12:15PM - in reply to Milrose Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Milrose wrote:

[quote]angie's mist wrote:

Scott? I don't think so.



Why not?[/quote]


Silly boy. (just to be him to it)
Please recycle or compost
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 1:16PM - in reply to JOKM Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
JOKM is so dumb he thinks Scott is SOKLR and that Scott was lying when he said he was doing the article. No, Scott was originally going to do it but the article was handed off to a national writer.

"Silly boy" - ScottH
scarfish22
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 1:22PM - in reply to Please recycle or compost Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
And you believe Scotth when he says that? Who's the silly boy:)now?

Scotth is a card, I agree, and he peppers most of his comments with a huge dosing of condescending attitude, but who cares about the guy? He's a credit mongrel and again, who cares?
Please recycle or compost
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 1:28PM - in reply to scarfish22 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Scott deserves a lot of credit for busting kip. So does Ouch1000 and Wayne Kursh and deadwood staff. Along with DaveB

"Silly boy!!!!"


Hahahahhahahahahahahah
set the record straight
RE: The beginning 4/23/2012 2:30PM - in reply to Please recycle or compost Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Please recycle or compost wrote:

Scott deserves a lot of credit for busting kip. So does Ouch1000 and Wayne Kursh and deadwood staff. Along with DaveB

"Silly boy!!!!"


Hahahahhahahahahahahah



Actually, scotth was quite late to the game in busting Kip. I'll give him credit that he provided some information during the mid-phase of the fact finding. But he was not there in the beginning.
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 | 251 | 252 | 253 | 254 | 255 |