Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Lionracer
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 9:13AM - in reply to ray Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
If anyone watched the US Indoor Champs this weekend (especially the men's 1500 meters), you would see that the so called "stiff arm" or "push" was nothing more than a sign of affection compared to what was going on at US Indoors.

Also, I don't see why anyone at all has brought up the fact that Leeder was completely impeding on Mulherin. Leeder had not established position at all after passing Mulherin. He began cutting in too early causing Mulherin to lose balance and put a hand on Leeder's back to maintain balance.

I don't care if Mulherin is a douche, he doesn't deserve to be disqualified.
lolwutt
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 9:14AM - in reply to Homestretch Observer Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Leeder did not have a full stride lead and can not cut in.

Mulherin had the choice of either being knocked off the track or stiff arm.

Leeder was at fault.

/your argument
On the infield.
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 9:32AM - in reply to Pantsl Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I heard the VT runner in question call an FSU coach "a f*cking cock" and the coach simply tell a VT coach to get his athlete under control.

The AD from Virginia Tech must be soo proud of his coach and his athletes - so must the ACC.
batman1234
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 9:33AM - in reply to dddd Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

dddd wrote:

I'm glad he got DQ'ed. Mulherin is and always will be a douche.


I'm not a fan of either the chokies, or FSU but I will say that the call is crap. Leeder was impeding Mulherin's stride. I was by the start line and as a runner I can say that in that situation most people would make the same decision unless you want your momentum completely shot. There were "bows" thrown both ways and it seems the offical action taken was excessive. Besides it seems if you DQ one you need to DQ both. Maybe UNC should have won?
X-Runner
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 9:46AM - in reply to lolwutt Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Mulherin had the choice of not letting the guy pass him in the first place by using his legs to run faster.
He can guard his space with his arm but not extend his hand out.
another former acc runner
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 9:50AM - in reply to batman1234 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

batman1234 wrote:

[quote]dddd wrote:

I'm glad he got DQ'ed. Mulherin is and always will be a douche.


I'm not a fan of either the chokies, or FSU but I will say that the call is crap. Leeder was impeding Mulherin's stride. I was by the start line and as a runner I can say that in that situation most people would make the same decision unless you want your momentum completely shot. There were "bows" thrown both ways and it seems the offical action taken was excessive. Besides it seems if you DQ one you need to DQ both. Maybe UNC should have won?[/quote]

Whether or not the call was crap, that doesn't excuse the athlete from being acting out like he did after the fact.
lolwutt
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 9:57AM - in reply to Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
More likely right after based on the vid.
Homestretch Observer
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 10:08AM - in reply to lolwutt Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

lolwutt wrote:

Leeder did not have a full stride lead and can not cut in.

Mulherin had the choice of either being knocked off the track or stiff arm.

Leeder was at fault.

/your argument


Leeder was not "cutting-in" when the contact happened. Leeder was already ahead at that point. Watch the video you want to flaunt in our faces. Mulherin does not break stride once so Leeder did not commit a foul. But Mulherin does not have room to get by Leeder without pushing him out of the way. Leeder is in front and it is his space that is being impeeded upon my Mulherin. When Leeder tries to protect his space that was rightfully gained when he PASSED Mulherin, Mulherin decides to push and shove his way through the inside. Busted by the official. Upheld by the meet referee. Get the violins out.
launchpad mcquak
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 10:08AM - in reply to lolwutt Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I can't tell what the contact before the big stiff arm was. I can't tell if the VT runner or the FSU runner threw the elbow before the second big shove. Regarless, the big stiff arm was uncessicary and done right in front of the officials, so if for nothing else he should have been DQ'd for stupidity.
Homestretch Observer
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 10:11AM - in reply to Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

another view wrote:

This is likely from before the contact.

http://e.imagehost.org/view/0743/acc3k


"Canadian Pansy"

More classy commentary from the Hokies. I'm sure the Tech coaches and AD would be impressed with Matt Saunders FB page.
Throwin Bows
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 11:45AM - in reply to another former acc runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

another former acc runner wrote:

Whether or not the call was crap, that doesn't excuse the athlete from being acting out like he did after the fact.


Ad hominem and irrelevant to this discussion. Feel free to start a new thread about getting your panties in a twist over passionate athletes celebrating if that's what you're into.

Anyone know if it's possible for the VT coaches to appeal the DQ call?
law book
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 12:06PM - in reply to Throwin Bows Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Throwin Bows wrote:


Anyone know if it's possible for the VT coaches to appeal the DQ call?


They did and they lost the appeal. Grow up.
Marshall
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 12:11PM - in reply to bottom line Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Wow you ACC pussies need to grow a pair. Pushing/Shoving happens in races. Just look at Big Tens... someone hit the deck in every distance race and no DQs handed out. Luciano and Peacock in the 3k, Ahmed in the 5k, and Mellon in the 800. Believe it or not but track is a contact sport.
uh_no
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 12:19PM - in reply to Norm Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Norm wrote:

send those points to Durham as we need them


perhaps more coaching and less useless message board posting would do the trick norm.....
One Guys Opinion
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 12:23PM - in reply to Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Homeboy better take it easy posting all of that shit to facebook. I wouldn't want to be documenting all of that smack talking.
TooPersonal
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 12:28PM - in reply to Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I don't care what you think or how passionate you are, you don't go posting somebody's personal web page here. State your case, post links to photos or vids, but leave the personal info and insults out of it.

I believe the rule is a stride and a half before cutting in. It does not appear from pics or vid that FSU guy had that, but I was not there. The officials made the call.
ntn
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 12:41PM - in reply to TooPersonal Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

TooPersonal wrote:

I don't care what you think or how passionate you are, you don't go posting somebody's personal web page here.




If it's on the internet, it isn't personal. Get used to it.
Big Scary Boss
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 12:44PM - in reply to ntn Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

ntn wrote:
If it's on the internet, it isn't personal. Get used to it.


Unfortunately, this is true.

I actually turned down a potential clerkship the other day due to facebook comments.

Be careful.
Throwin Bows
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 12:44PM - in reply to law book Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

law book wrote:

They did and they lost the appeal. Grow up.


Thanks for the info, I didn't realize they had already appealed. Appreciate the unnecessary jab, jackass.
The Jabber
RE: ACC Men's 3000 DQ -- Cost VT the team title 3/1/2010 1:06PM - in reply to Throwin Bows Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
You're the jackass, jackass!
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |