
| Zach and Cody |
| ||
|
I was reading a formula in Runner's World to help me predict my marathon time. They said to take your half marathon time, multiply it by two, and add ten minutes. I want to check this out so I plugged in the PRs of this Dathon Ritzenhopper guy people keep writing about. DR HM - 1:00:00 DR FM - 2:10:00 (Half Marathon Time * 2) + 10 minutes = Marathon Time (1:00:00 * 2) + 10:00 = 2:10:00 Exact. Not close. Exact. That would have placed him well in New York City (although he wouldn't have been close to winning). I ran a 1:16:00 half marathon at the Rock N Roll Half Marathon. I'm fully expecting to run 2:42:00 next month. No need to discuss. End of thread. |
| 26mi235 |
| ||
|
One formula is to take your 10k (road) time and multiple by 4.66. This only works if you have been doing the necessary distance so that you can run a marathon relatively as well as you can a 10K. (a track 10,000 will be a little faster and you might need to tack on a little bit) An almost identical rule is to add 10% to your pace (1.10 x 42.2 is 46.42, divide by 10k and you have 4.642, marginally faster than the 4.66 rule. Any rule that adds a fixed number of minutes will have flaws above and below certain pace levels. You might convert that 10 minutes to a percent and have a more reliable rule. This rule, at the listed 76 pace implies a slowing of 6.58%, but a real stud would be slower by over 8%, which is too much of a slow down. A 60:00 guy (especially if not a peak race) could be expected to go as fast as 2:06, which is 10.25% slow down. Even the 6.58% is conservative because if you use the double-the-distance, increment the time by 6.6% rule you would get a 6.6% going from 10k to 20k (or a HM, similar distance), and then tack on another 6.6%; with compounding, it is 13.6% slower. If you have been doing at least some of your long runs quickly you should be able to do better than this HM rule. |
20% off the adidas AdiZero at Eastbay.com. LetsRun.com visitors get 20% off