UWP Fan wrote:
Pets park runner wrote:Very nice to see that it only took a week to get the full results out. On the women's side, not only did they take the unattached runners out, but they only listed the DI runners until a day or two ago. Interesting since it was a DII school hosting the meet. Normally Parkside does everything so well, so this was a little strange that it took so long for complete results.
Meet results did not take a week to get out. They were available almost immediately after each race. The DI, DII thing have nothing to do with the host school, it has to do with DI rules about having separate results for DI schools (something to do with rankings). Parkside always does everything so well, and will continue to do everything so well.
I will repeat again, it took about a week to get the FULL results out. I checked on a daily basis online on the Parkside website, on Wisconsin Runner, etc. and could never find any results with ALL of the runners listed. I believe for the women they only listed the DI women and for the men they listed all collegiate runners, but not the unattached. Finally, about a week later they listed the FULL set of results. I am not sure why you are arguing about this. Maybe the FULL results were posted at the meet site or coaches were given a copy, but the online results took a week before all of the runners were listed. The strange thing is that in the women's results they had all the teams listed no matter what the division, but only the DI runners were listed in the individual results.
As I said in my first post, normally they do things so well, so I was surpised by this.