Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
The Rocket.
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 11:54AM - in reply to surge235 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
There is a difference between celebrating and showboating. There is a difference between celebrating and taunting.

IMO as Wyner came down the final stretch he was showboating. And the bow at the end was a taunt to the other runners and to the crowd. I thought his actions did deserve the DQ.

Celebrating is fine, but it should never be done to make other runners look bad. When El G, Bolt, KB or Hall celebrated after major victories they were not trying to make the other runners feel bad or diminish there performance. Wyner was definitely trying to do that. He was basically saying, "Look at me winning against all these jokesters!"

If he or someone else represented the US like that I would be ashamed. It reminds me of the 2004 Olympics and all that dumb showboating stuff they were doing.
who are you?
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 12:08PM - in reply to who cares Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
that is one of the most fail statements i have ever heard. the ivy league is more intelligent than you and probably more athletic too. ouch.
gringo Star
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 12:14PM - in reply to Crimson/Maroon Runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

and for all recent conference meets since it is in their nature to be as much


Not sure where this sentiment is coming from.

I've never noticed Dartmouth to be more vocal than any other team. Particularly, Cornell with their "CU" chants and their team which is somehow always 2x bigger than anyone elses.
Ivy League PC
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 12:19PM - in reply to The Rocket. Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
If Wyner had been black, ooops, a person of color, I guarantee you no one would have dared to DQ him.
TrackCoach
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 12:42PM - in reply to wejo Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

wejo wrote:

Wow 80 posts on one guy.

At the race, I said this and after watching the video I say it even more. I don't think Jimmy should have been DQd. He crossed the finish line first, he didn't impede anyone.

As someone said, when did making an ass out of yourself become grounds for DQ. I've never heard of this being done in the history of the sport as long as I can remember. Someone else can remind me if it has ever happened.

Watching it on video was less much shocking than seeing it in person. He had just pulled in front, and I was thinking "ok Jimmy don't go too soon, you've got to make it all the way to the line." And right then boom, his hand went up. I was shocked. Some more celebration and then like 20 meters of running to the line with boos coming down from the crowd. I guess he knew he had it won. It was embarrassing the whole scene and the boos made it worse. I was a bit reluctant to look over a Jimmy and right when I did, the bow to the boos.

I know Jimmy has learned from this. I'm all for celebrating but he has to be mindful of his fellow competitors and how others will receive him. The League doesn't like him or Cornell to begin with and that factors into the equation.

Having said that I don't think a DQ is the way to go. Kick him out of the meet or something but he won the race fair and square. I think the people saying he impeded a Dartmouth runner must be joking. But maybe not. People are pretty heated at the Heps. When he was DQd people rose and gave a standing ovation. I think taking pleasure in another man's downfall is pretty classless as well. Not saying 2 wrongs make a right but that the Heps is like no other meet.


I was not at the race and I have not read the Heps rule book, but I did watch the vid a couple of times and perhaps it does not tell the whole story. What I saw was an athlete celebrating a victory and acknowling the crowd, he was not taunting or impeding the progress of other runners, which in mind are the most important factors to consider a DQ.

Where can I write to express my concern about the decision? I know this might be a sensitive issue as a coach, but you are not initiating this action, you are simply responding to a request for contact information. - TrackCoach
Crimson/Maroon Runner
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 12:44PM - in reply to gringo Star Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Cornell can be loud, particularly with a cheer as simple as "CU". I've only really noticed the "CU" cheer during the relays since that is when the majority of the team can get together to cheer.

Dartmouth's cheers are longer, more detailed ("When Dartmouth Green comes marching in, when Dartmouth Green comes marching in... (I forget the rest of the cheer)"), and more frequent during the meet.



gringo Star wrote:
I've never noticed Dartmouth to be more vocal than any other team. Particularly, Cornell with their "CU" chants and their team which is somehow always 2x bigger than anyone elses.
johnnyb1610
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 12:50PM - in reply to The Rocket. Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
For the last time. He bowed to the crowd booing him. It was a reaction from a guy who is outgoing and not afraid to defend himself. He bowed to the crowd booing him. The fans were pathetic and poor losers. The crowd booed him. That is the poor sportsmanship. The loser crowd booed. The celebration of him going across the finish is done by runners all the time. I'll mention it again, Rupp has never been DQ'd for celebrating. More people hate him than Wyner, I'm sure. Most people don't know who Wyner is. The crowd booed him. That was the problem. This is becoming the dumbest thread I've ever read. Anyone who thinks he should have been DQ'd is a sore loser or is an A-hole themselves.

THE CROWD BOOED HIM. HE REACTED.
bfullem
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 12:58PM - in reply to wejo Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I can't believe he was DQ'ed! I was not there but watched the video.

I met Jimmy before, found him to be a very good kid.

When I was a freshman at Bucknell in 1983 we were in the then ECC (East Coast Conference). Lasalle was in it's last conference meet with us before going to the A-10. We were losing going into the 5K (the next to last race of the meet) and we swept the top 4 places. We were going crazy cheering, waving orange towels, chanting BU. Evidently there was some rule on the books against "organized encouragement"!!! Our 4 guys got DQ'ed and Lasalle won the meet. They celebrated by throwing their coach into the water pit after the meet.

It is very sad when officials take things away from kids that worked so hard for something.




wejo wrote:

Wow 80 posts on one guy.

At the race, I said this and after watching the video I say it even more. I don't think Jimmy should have been DQd. He crossed the finish line first, he didn't impede anyone.

As someone said, when did making an ass out of yourself become grounds for DQ. I've never heard of this being done in the history of the sport as long as I can remember. Someone else can remind me if it has ever happened.

Watching it on video was less much shocking than seeing it in person. He had just pulled in front, and I was thinking "ok Jimmy don't go too soon, you've got to make it all the way to the line." And right then boom, his hand went up. I was shocked. Some more celebration and then like 20 meters of running to the line with boos coming down from the crowd. I guess he knew he had it won. It was embarrassing the whole scene and the boos made it worse. I was a bit reluctant to look over a Jimmy and right when I did, the bow to the boos.

I know Jimmy has learned from this. I'm all for celebrating but he has to be mindful of his fellow competitors and how others will receive him. The League doesn't like him or Cornell to begin with and that factors into the equation.

Having said that I don't think a DQ is the way to go. Kick him out of the meet or something but he won the race fair and square. I think the people saying he impeded a Dartmouth runner must be joking. But maybe not. People are pretty heated at the Heps. When he was DQd people rose and gave a standing ovation. I think taking pleasure in another man's downfall is pretty classless as well. Not saying 2 wrongs make a right but that the Heps is like no other meet.
mile in his shoes
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 12:58PM - in reply to johnnyb1610 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I'd also like to know who I should contact about this. Does anyone know?
Camoo
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 1:25PM - in reply to mile in his shoes Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
This is an occasion of extreme shame for the Ivy League, of which I was once an insignificant part. And the shame is not Wyner's...it's the shame of the officials who made this idiotic decision. This is not kindergarten, people. Or maybe it is.
holla day
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 1:37PM - in reply to Camoo Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
The most absurd thing is that Miller, the other Cornell guy who shoved the race leader so hard that he fell and dropped out, did not get DQed (unless he did, which I hope is the case).

If someone should get DQed, it's Miller, not Wyner. Officials can be such assholes.
mile in his shoes
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 1:39PM - in reply to holla day Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I Amirault tried to drop out to the outside and clipped Miller?
clear this up
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 1:43PM - in reply to mile in his shoes Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
amirault was pacing the race(or more specifically maag) because he fairs better in faster races. instead of dropping out to the inside of the track he tried to go outside and got tripped.
mile in his shoes
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 1:46PM - in reply to clear this up Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
That seems like an odd tactic - Maag is a stud and doesn't need pacing to be competitive. I think he may well have faired better in more of a RACE. A rabbit in there to take it out slower than some of the field's PR pace isn't exactly going to prevent a kick.... and Maag has a great kick!
Tigerfan
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 1:47PM - in reply to TrackCoach Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

TrackCoach wrote:


I was not at the race and I have not read the Heps rule book, but I did watch the vid a couple of times and perhaps it does not tell the whole story. What I saw was an athlete celebrating a victory and acknowling the crowd, he was not taunting or impeding the progress of other runners, which in mind are the most important factors to consider a DQ.

Where can I write to express my concern about the decision? I know this might be a sensitive issue as a coach, but you are not initiating this action, you are simply responding to a request for contact information. - TrackCoach


As Wejo has said above it was much more shocking when viewed from the field level rather than from the remote camera position. All the coaches from the other schools near the finish line were completely shocked at his behavior (including at least one from Cornell). If you want to contact someone try the guys who made the decision Mel Rosen, Harry Groves or Mark Kostek.
Coach Taylor did not challenge their decision.
ur a dumb dumb
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 2:05PM - in reply to holla day Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

holla day wrote:

The most absurd thing is that Miller, the other Cornell guy who shoved the race leader so hard that he fell and dropped out, did not get DQed (unless he did, which I hope is the case).

If someone should get DQed, it's Miller, not Wyner. Officials can be such assholes.



Are you serious? Miller did nothing wrong. From Miller's perspective, this random Princeton guy is leading the race, all of a sudden steps in front of him, tries to trip him up, and then drops out. It almost looked like it was Princeton's strategy to take Miller out of the race. Of course this isn't true, but there is NO way that Miller did anything wrong.
hahahhah
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 2:14PM - in reply to ur a dumb dumb Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
How can Samara justify throwing a kid out for unsportsmanlike conduct in the same race he qualified a kid specifically to rabbit his top guy? It's a pretty slippery slope.
douche
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 2:16PM - in reply to Tigerfan Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Celebrating is fine, especially when you have a big lead coming to the line etc.

However, this dickhead had barely passed everyone and immediately started throwing up the one stick and celebrating. It looked like it was done to rub it in the faces of the other competitors by doing it so soon. If you didn't want to rub it in like that, you would wait a bit.
If I was one of the other guys in the race, I would sure have been pissed about it and thought it was intended to be disrespectful.

He may have been bowing to the crowd, but it was right in the direction of the other runners and you can't really tell who it was actually intended for.

If he was really just celebrating, why didn't he comeback to congratulate some of the other competitors, shake hands etc. He was trying to be a dick, hence the reason he ran off right away after...

Harry hates that Shit. I'm not surprised he dq'd him.
Whether or not he warranted the dq, I think it was definitely intended as a taunt. I lost any respect I had for the guy. DoucheBag!
newsflash
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 2:42PM - in reply to douche Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
He celebrated because he had the race well in hand. He won by a full second, we're talking more than 20feet here.
we are donyell marshall
RE: Wyner 5/11/2009 2:54PM - in reply to Tigerfan Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Tigerfan wrote:

Coach Taylor did not challenge their decision.


This is pretty much all that needs to be said. If the Cornell coaching staff felt the DQ was unwarranted, they would have appealed the DQ. They didn't.
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |