sure Mr Ray
i still disagree with Renato's broad training methodology though, i am just trying to get to that really whilst paying respect at the same time for the highly detailed knowledge of all of the facets of training. Essentially i still believe that the overall pattern of training lacks rhythm, whether Soviet style or not.
As for Wellnow i can see he has gained an understanding as well of most of the parts or facets of training. I just want to see from him how he actually puts it all together, for the same reason i want to see more of Renato's work. I basically have a problem with the fact that it is all just buzzwords and labels to him, there appears to be no concrete underlying understanding going on.
So i partially agree when he says:
only partially because it is just one of the challenges - this mechanics training that leads to the correct balance between stride rate and stride frequency. The other two challenges involve the energetics - conditioning the systems of the body and the psychotics - development of the psychological factors. All three are developed in balance. As my coach says you have conditioning and you have technique and they are developed hand in hand.
And again only partial agreement:
yes run long at a good pace, yes in order to cause glycogen depletion and therefore stimulate a greater storage of this glycogen. But also run long at a good pace to raise the anaerobic threshold, or whatever it should be called. It is the raising of this threshold that also causes the increased mitochondria, increased aerobic enzyme amounts, increased capilliarisation and whatever else occurs to increase the aerobic capacity.
He goes on to say things like train don't strain which is excellent in itself and appears to be borrowed from Lydiard, yet moving to the edge of straining whilst still staying short is the real trick for optimisation of any part of the training plan, how to fine tune this is the essence of high performance coaching.
He also uses the word progressive which is essential to optimising this 'edge'. The 'edge' where an well trained high performance athlete spends most of his training life. How to find this edge and then to progressively develop it without going over into injury or over-training is again a thing to be fine tuned.
He also mentions listen to your body - an excellent suggestion and again part of this fine tuning. It is also something to be wary of in oneself for it becomes easy to deceive oneself and use excuses not to work right at your 'edge'.
Slow running between the hard sessions is another excellent piece of advice but what is slow running exactly. For me slow running is not very descriptive and i think if it is used between harder 'edge' developing sessions then it's purpose is for recovery prior to the next harder 'edge' developing session. The recovery sessions should be in the recovery zone which is that effort zone which actively recovers the athlete. In HR terms this must be above 120bpm and probably not much more. In breathing terms it is above that point where the breath is stimulated to actively draw beyond resting levels. It is the level of effort where you can control the breath and keep it drawing from the diaphragm and not allowing it to rise up any higher,into the chest as the main example.
One other thing he mentions is that there is a big variation in what suits one person over another and whilst true it is not something that should be true. It is more in what we like and dislike. The process of training is accepting that certain things are common to human beings and if we dislike something in training this is more centered in a psychological weakness that can be challenged and overcome. So if long steady running is disliked then it should be progressively worked at. If lactate tolerance work is disliked it should be something to be worked at. Dislikes are not good enough when training for high performance nor enough if a non high performance person wished to maximise themselves to their own true capacity.
Finally and most importantly the disregards the need for optimisation of the aerobic capacity, followed by the aerobic power generated from that capacity and for the anaerobic capacity and the anaerobic power generated from that capacity. These are the fundamentals of the energetics of training. This is the biggest flaw i see.
hope not too many words