| Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | |
| loki |
| ||
|
very informative post! |
| loki |
| ||
|
besides all the nueromuscular work (faster paced running, hills, heavy weights e.t.c), what are some remedial exercises one can do to alter recruiting patterns and become "nice movers"? most drills usually do not have a carryover effect and i would not think just consciously focusing on running with that stride would work. specifically i'm looking for muscle releasing techniques, muscle activators, and remedial exercises. |
| Pmoax |
| ||
|
Form drills when done correctly can be very effective in my opinion. B-Skips are great for activating the hamstring. A-March and A-Skip when done correctly (focusing on driving through the ground and generating great force production) are also good. Doing squats in place allow for activation of most leg muscles. |
| Anthony Colotti |
| ||
|
I concur when drills are done CORRECTLY and in perfect sequence with the global training means it will definitely improve form. They are best done when FRESH, ie as a morning light workout. A lot of people do them before a hard workout, I really don't know why. I know many will disagree, but why do drills before a specific workout? It would be too little to late. Also drills are strenuous and use the CP system. This would not prepare the body for the energy system development needed for middle distances and would tire an athlete out. Activation work? Google it and look up Mike Robertson and Eric Cressey. Also don't forget MAT http://www.muscleactivation.com |
| fUrCeOsNhN |
| ||
Great Post Does Bekele have incorrect form here then? http://dailynews.runnersworld.com/images/2007/08/23/bekele_kenenisahengelo07.jpg About Kipketer shutting it down when his form started to break-there is little point to getting that slight extra fitness boost if you have to use incorrect form to do it. You are just confusing your body what correct running form is. |
| OldSub4 |
| ||
|
Good pic of Symmonds striding mid race: http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_062908_olympics_nick_symmonds.8997c03.html |
| Pmoax |
| ||
|
This is my gpp for the next 4 weeks. I would greatly appreciate some criticisim. Monday:4X5X20m Sled Pulls 30 seconds between reps and 5 minutes between sets Tuesday:10X400m Hills @85s with ~2 minute jog down recovery Wednesday:6 Miles + couple striders at the end Thursday:3X3X300m @42 with 2 minutes between reps and 2 minutes between sets Friday:6 Miles + 12X200 @32 with 2 minute recovery Saturday:2 Miles + 3X1Mile @5:30 + 8X50m Hils + 2 miles Sunday:5 Miles + couple striders Weights are done on Mondays and Thursdays after the intervals Plyo's are done on Mondays and Thursdays before the intervals any advice would be appreciated |
| fUrCeOsNhN |
| ||
|
Do the sled pulls seem to be helping? What about the pylos? How steep is the hill for that 10X400m in 85? 4%,6% etc? Just asking because I do a similar workout on a 400m hill too. How much mileage is this, about 50? Any doubles? What is your PR? Was is after similar training? |
| Pmoax |
| ||
I have always done sled pulls coming from a 200-400 background. I feel the sled work and acceleration work in general helps with switching gears as well as overall running effeciency (sp). Plyos are something new and that I have just started. Mostly bounds and squats jumps for now. The hill is not very steep but it is grass and the same gradient throughout. How do I measure the steepness? The mileage is a tad over 40 some times. No doubles at this stage but I do try and sauna twice to three times a week. My pr is 1:56.03 electronic and 1:53 in the relay. They were massive pr's by close to 8 seconds in the relay. The training was kinda similar but built upon a corrupt base, I am trying to correct that this year. |
| fUrCeOsNhN |
| ||
|
I use www.gmap-pedometer.com a.Measure Distance in miles b.Measure Elevation Change in feet b/aX5280=% slope If it is a grassy area it might be tough to get good readings but there is an option to use a satelite image instead of a street map which should help. |
| foomiler |
| ||
|
Yes u have pointed out a great situation with African runners with Bekele. Note that the guy has short trunk relative to his leg length. The same goes for Gebrselassie. When guys like that pull up their leg using hamstrings, their very light & small trunks are already "falling" forward due to momentum (and perhaps a slight lean). This trunk movement happens faster for runners built like that which results in the foot being lifted way higher behind them than for heavier built Caucasians, for example. I may be wrong about the 'good' and 'bad' back kick thing, but the Africans are a unique breed, as I have posted earlier on. I compared Ereng with the rest of the field in the 1988 Oly 800m, esp Barbosa & Cruz, to show how Kenyan physiology dictates a choice of form no other ethnicity can duplicate. I think this applies to Bekele also. Most Caucasians & Asians cannot have high 'bad' back kicks unless they are overstriding, heel-striking, landing with straight leg reaching for the ground, and over emphasising foot push off. But Africans are able to maintain short economical strides landing under their centre of gravity and still have high back lifts that face the sole skyward! I have no other explanation other than the way they are built, and also how they must have way stronger hamstrings than quadriceps. I believe there are others who can sort this out better than I can. (or maybe Bekele DOES have 'bad' form!???) |
| xxx |
| ||
|
Great stuff. Ethiopians seem to be stocky if you compare then with lanky kenyans (some kenyans are even tall - e.g. Kiprop ). Are they built the same way so that would dictate the same technique? |
| foomiler |
| ||
|
I'm not 100% sure of any of this, just from years of observation & video analyses. But I see the Kenyans & Ethiopians as running with a anterior pelvic tilt most of the time, which is why Bekele & Ereng have such high & 'skyward-facing' back kicks. Maybe its because they were taught to run like this, or maybe its precisely because they WEREN'T TAUGHT ANYTHING regarding technique, that they just run according to what enables them to maximise race performances. I'm not sure. Even when Bekele is sprinting at 53 sec final lap of a 5k or 10k, he's still primarily keeping his hips "behind" him, maintaining that anterior tilt. That's why I believe he has such back kicks. But American sprinters are taught to run with a posterior pelvic tilt, hips "tucked underneath" the torso, so that they will NOT HAVE SUCH HIGH REAR KICKS. This will also maximise the forward knee drive. I've seen many distance coaches teach the same drills that sprinters use to distance runners. I wonder if the drills many distance coaches in America have been teaching their athletes actually train them to run more like sprinters than middle/long distance runners? Maybe these drills are appropriate for unleashing that final sprint in a race, but not as the abiding mechanics suited to maintain race pace at distance events? Imagine if u have already been running with hips under your trunk for most of an 800m race, only to watch as other runners suddenly "sit in" & pull away at the end, but you've got no other postural position to change into except for the 'slower'"hips behind" position, which does not allow u to drive forward as effectively. Wouldn't you start to think you have 'no kick' or 'no speed'? From my own observation alone, most Caucasian distance athletes tend to run with a relatively posteriorily tilted pelvis for an entire distance race. I think Matt Tegenkamp seems to be a recent example. They're already utilising too much hip flexor/glutes/quads right from the start. Also compare Caucasian distance runners from the 1970s/80s to those of the 21st century. The former tend to have thinner quads, skinny long legs, not so muscled overall. The latter seem to have HUGE quadriceps and calves, esp the halfmilers. Compare also the build of African runners from that same bygone era to those of today. Can you really see anything too different between the two? Western athletes today seem to rely more on the quads & hip flexors compared to their predecessors. They weight-train more and do more speed drills which seem to foster short distance mechanics rather than what distance events require. The recent thinking seems to be that "everyone knows how to run slow, but we need to get faster to beat the Africans so let's run like sprinters!" A possible reason why I believe the Africans tend towards an anterior pelvic tilt is due to the physiology of their lower legs. They tend to have smaller gastrocnemius and longer soleus, and rely as such on the latter to run. In order to activate the soleus more than the gastroc, I think maybe they need to keep their hips behind their trunks. Their back kicks could be dictated by the structure of their lower legs. Whether this calf structure is a function of nature or nurture I can't tell for sure. Look at westerners and at their lower legs. I think you can find many elite distance runners today who have very developed gastrocnemius relative to the soleus. I wonder if its due to the way they are born, or is it because westerners (of recent years at least) adopt sprint-like or semi-sprint-like running mechanics, which emphasises the gastrocnemius (upper calf)? Look at Steve Scott, Dave Wottle, Jim Spivey, Craig Masback. Do these fellas from the 70s/80s have huge quads and huge upper calves? Compare with Alan Webb, Nick Symmonds, Khadevis Robinson, etc. Both eras have produced sub 1:50 and sub 3:40 runners, but we cannot deny that the going seems to be getting tougher for Caucasian athletes of today than those of three or four decades ago. Why is this so? Can part of this be that we have become confused as to how to run like distance athletes? |
| xxx |
| ||
|
tx for a very detailed response! |
| fUrCeOsNhN |
| ||
|
Is this a good example of "sitting" while kicking? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQjjLgT-WHA&feature=related 3:40-4:05 (side view) |
| xxx |
| ||
|
where do the north africans fit into this picture? |
| Mr. Ray |
| ||
|
I don't know, but the East Africans kick butt!
|
| wellnow |
| ||
[/quote] Mr. Ray, I just want people to realize that the old idea that "aerobic development is unlimited" (to quote Lydiard) is wrong. What is unlimited is the contractile/co-ordination aspect of muscle development. So when we look for continuous improvement year after year then you are right to say: "To run the same distance in less time. That's what we should all be training for. Not some vague notions of what we think might be happening inside our muscles, hearts or lungs." So let's ditch the vague notions, and concentrate on maintaining that longer stride for a longer time, that's where every runner can improve. So we concentrate on running fast in our hard sessions rather than training hard. Isn't that the true essence of Lydiardism? Millions of athletes are worrying about their "aerobic development" when they shouldn't be. |
| Anthony Colotti |
| ||
|
Kind of. While in well trained athletes aerobic development will be almost maxed out, in younger/undertrained athletes aerobic development still has potential. There has to be a balance between general, special and specific training means. One begets the other in a continuous flow with the ultimate goal of sport mastery. I do agree that most of the training we do now is based off of dogmas and "this is what I used to do and it worked." Most mid-distance training is geared toward a global adaptation of the cardiovascular system. There needs to be a devotion to developing the local muscular endurance and the skeletal muscles ability to accumulate and utilize lactate for energy. This is best done through resistance training means and is verified through many pieces of research in literature going back to 1978-80. Unfortunately most of it has not been translated into English. |
| UKMaster |
| ||
|
Hey fascinating stuff. Any thoughts on sessions to improve lactic buffering? BTW I'm a 48 yr old Master, and although I'm an experienced road runner, I've only been running track for a couple of years so advice would be welcome. Cheers |
| Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | |