Yup Yup wrote:
This thread is driving me crazy.
A. The article limited the competition to NBA players competing against each other. It did not say that an NBA player would medal vs. the real-life Olympic Track and Field athletes.
B. I hold a very strong opinion that many professional athletes would be national/internationl T&F athletes if that was their priority. Would you rather get chicks, get a scholarship, get hero-worshipped, or would you rather throw the shot put wearing a mask? Every high school cross country runner I know was too small for the football team. If the better athletes had ran Cross, they would've been better than us. Of course, over time, we trained for our sport, and got better.
As a former football player and decathlete, let me say that if the better "athletes" ran cross, they'd get their clock cleaned by cross country runners; it's a completely different type of athleticism. I'm not world class by any stretch, but I've jumped 23', thrown the shot 48', and run the 100 in 11-flat--I'm a way better "athlete" than most XC runners. But after getting into distance running for a while, it's absolutely a different story. I still haven't broken 19 for the 5k, I can't run more than 35-40 mpw without getting hurt, etc.
On the original subject, there would probably be NBA players who would be world-class high jumpers pretty quickly (look at Donald Thomas). There would probably be NFL guys who could be world class in the short sprints pretty quickly (think Ted Ginn). These are the only two instances I can think of where pro athletes in a game could be competitive at the world-class level in athletics.