Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 |
lets go1010
RE: 2008 DIII XC 6/27/2008 2:53PM - in reply to but....... Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
bump
post Master General
RE: 2008 DIII XC 6/28/2008 4:46PM - in reply to lets go1010 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I also do not know why people are keeping NYU as the second ranked team in the country, they might not even make it to nationals as a team this year.
yooo
RE: 2008 DIII XC 6/28/2008 5:06PM - in reply to post Master General Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
they definitely shouldn't be ranked 2nd, maybe closer to 20th, but they had a pretty deep team last year and if some guys improve a little they'll have a solid team. my guess is that is that they'll get third at the atlantic region for an at large bid.
paper buildings
RE: 2008 DIII XC 6/29/2008 3:03AM - in reply to but....... Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Cortland, barring injury should be a lock for the #1 spot in the atlantic region, but other than that, it will be a dogfight for the second spot, as well as the next 2 or 3. This will be a lot more clearer after the first couple weeks of races, but until then it is near impossible to tell.
kibitzer
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/10/2008 1:59PM - in reply to paper buildings Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Okay, practices start in, what, six weeks? Who's got the good/great incoming classes? Who's having a notable summer of training?
someD3kid
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/11/2008 7:13AM - in reply to kibitzer Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
bump
?
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/11/2008 10:29AM - in reply to someD3kid Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
didn't cortland's top guys transfer to penn state after coach moran left?
twosies
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/13/2008 12:32PM - in reply to paper buildings Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
i agree that cortland is looking pretty good, but i don't think there will be that much of a dog fight for the second spot. more like for the 3 and 4 spots
paper buildings
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/13/2008 5:24PM - in reply to twosies Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Then who is in the 2 spot?
twosies
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/13/2008 6:19PM - in reply to paper buildings Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
i'm not going to say who i think because i'll get ridiculed,
but i think there will be a team that'll surprise everyone,
which i know is a pretty weak prediction considering that
it is more likely that there will be a surprise team than not.
ridiculer
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/13/2008 6:27PM - in reply to twosies Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

twosies wrote:

i'm not going to say who i think because i'll get ridiculed,
but i think there will be a team that'll surprise everyone,
which i know is a pretty weak prediction considering that
it is more likely that there will be a surprise team than not.


Nice prediction, loser. It took a lot of guts, forethought, and intelligence to say "I bet...someone will get second."
twosies
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/13/2008 6:47PM - in reply to ridiculer Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
haha true
alright then, someone's going to upset cortland out of no where
Mikejones999
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/13/2008 6:56PM - in reply to twosies Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I think they're talking about Ithaca's b-team. They were top 10 in the atlantic region last year.
results
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/13/2008 7:00PM - in reply to Mikejones999 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
yea....
how did you know?
ha
weeeeaakkkk
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/13/2008 8:38PM - in reply to twosies Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

twosies wrote:

i'm not going to say who i think because i'll get ridiculed,
but i think there will be a team that'll surprise everyone,
which i know is a pretty weak prediction considering that
it is more likely that there will be a surprise team than not.


So you're gonna say the two spot is a lock then not say who it is? If you were a real man you would say it. Then we can tell you why you are wrong.
well....
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/13/2008 9:33PM - in reply to weeeeaakkkk Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Nothing is ever a lock. Last year Calvin should've been a lock as they returned most of the guys from the team that won nationals team with 37 points (or somewhere around there). Yet they didn't put it together and didn't even get top three, and that can always happen.
T lake
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/13/2008 10:14PM - in reply to well.... Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Watch out for Richard Dunbar Institute of Technology. New Team on the scene out of the mid east region....
post Master General
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/13/2008 11:13PM - in reply to well.... Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Calvin was by no means a lock, the fact that they were number 1 for almost the whole season in the rankings, goes to show hoe much of a crock the rankings are some times.... NYU was second in 2006 and returned EVERYONE from that team, NYU ended up winning nats with out the help of arguably their best distance runner, who while in the race did not contribute nearly as he should have due to injury.


That being said....they will not be as ready to roll this year although I am sure they will still find a way to put something competitive together.
well....
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/14/2008 12:28AM - in reply to post Master General Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Calvin should've been a lock not by virtue of the rankings which clearly are always a huge guessing game, but by the fact that they returned runners who placed 5, 12, 17, 31 and 51 in 2006. That is four all-americans - if those runners could've just equaled their placing from last year they would've ruined NYU and everyone else.

But the point is, teams are never locks, because so much can happen between seasons that you never really know what things can look like. Cortland brings six guys into the cross country season who have run nationally competitive times in track, but injuries, burnout or a big choke session at nationals can render that level of talent irrelevant, and some team that overperforms this upcoming season could absolutely steal away the title.
Inigo Montoya
RE: 2008 DIII XC 7/14/2008 9:01AM - in reply to post Master General Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
[quote]post Master General wrote:

NYU ended up winning nats with out the help of arguably their best distance runner, who while in the race did not contribute nearly as he should have due to injury. [quote]

What? Who? Say what you want about Hany, but he was probably their best distance runner. Are you talkngi about someone else being injured? Hany finished 8th if I recall, which is still legitimate.

I think those who are counting NYU out are foolish. Repeat as #1? I doubt it. But they'll be there.
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 |