I look like a spartan. im at 178, 6'2 run 50 miles a week, yet i think im more of just something pretty to look at, its rather dissapointing. Women become intimidated by tone and athleticism at a certain point.
I look like a spartan. im at 178, 6'2 run 50 miles a week, yet i think im more of just something pretty to look at, its rather dissapointing. Women become intimidated by tone and athleticism at a certain point.
Agree with most of what has been posted. IMHO the OP is a true Napolean type - trying to get the tall girl to prove to everyone that he isn't that short.
He has classic Napolean complexes.
One turn-off for girls is TOO much muscle. Often girls find body-builders hideous/gross. Lightly/moderately muscled is the way to go.
Height is definitely more important than weight (lack thereof).
How say u?
people in glass houses wrote:
Women become intimidated by tone and athleticism at a certain point.
Partially correct:
http://www.magazine.ucla.edu/exclusives/weight-mate-relation/index1.html... women in the study seemed to be on to muscular men. When presented with six standardized silhouettes of men ranging from brawny to slender, 141 undergraduate women consistently identified the most muscular ones as not only less likely to commit but also more volatile and domineering. In the study, the women rated "toned" guys — the physical type two notches down from "brawny" — as the most sexually attractive.
For you runners with no upper body tone, get some. You can still be fast.
interesting article, hell if the average is 4 i shouldnt be complaining. Its all relative in comparision i guess.
hot or not wrote:
wineturtle wrote:Ex-Mrs WiT's I ,II were at least 3 1/2 inches over my 5'8" but overcomming a 5"5" start would make most tall gals shy away,just too much difference.
As much as the joke "nose in it toes in it" seems fun , life isn't that forgiving.
What does "overcomming a 5"5" start" mean? Not dissing your post but don't understand.
No matter how good a person is inside the 5'5" body I believe most 6 foot gals would not think of someone that short as a potential partner.
I was about an inch under average in the '60s and am sure the average American male is very close to 5'10" nowadays
making a 5'5" male of today noticably " Quite SHORT" .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIQ5S3TqgP0tinab wrote:
Gold chains? I hope that was suggested ironically. Men who wear jewelry are a real turn-off. Blech.
why does michael johnson have a gold chain here? it's his alpha male symbol. he is a succesful man. wearing a gold chain reminds him of that fact constantly, so he is just going to get even more confident.
frankie fredericks is not an alpha male(and he loses).
nice guys always lose.
I need to lose weight? Last I checked 5'11" and 120 pounds looks sickly.
What exactly do you mean by "hooking up"?
I think he meant to say "looking up." God forbid the girl ever wanted to get dressed and wear heels, that would be a disaster.
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
NAU women have no excuse - they should win it all at 2024 NCAA XC
Clayton Murphy is giving some great insight into his training.
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion