He pretty much measures his own noose, slips it around his neck, and hangs himself in this laughable piece:
"I know that a small group of people doubted I could do what I did without taking drugs and that's not because of any allegations or investigations, but because my performances were that good."
A _small_ group, Michael???
"The fact that I was tested more than 100 times during my career and never tested positive should support the fact that I achieved my success clean."
Right. Right. Like BALCO never happened. Like you can test for HGH or insulin. Or test+epitest. Or they had a test for EPO while you were around, nevermind tested sprinters for EPO.
"I have never felt the need to defend myself in the past when our sport has come under attack and people have said that the majority of athletes are doping."
So, um--why are you "defending" yourself?
"it saddens and disappoints me greatly that I now have to feel defensive about my performances, even though no one has ever accused me."
Fascinating piece of illogic there, Michael.
"I actually still believe that most of the athletes are in fact clean."
Does the IAAF take away your Scooby Snacks if you admit the truth, Michael?