Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 | 251 | 252 | 253 | 254 | 255 | 256 | 257 | 258 | 259 | 260 | 261 | 262 | 263 | 264 | 265 | 266 | 267 | 268 | 269 | 270 | 271 | 272 |
PeeSonmysACk
RE: XC Nationals 12/29/2010 3:38PM - in reply to What Else Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
This post is aimed at "What Else"...so I want to start off by saying that you're a complete idiot. You probably haven't ever been to a conference meet and actually watched the distance races based off of what was said in your last post.

1. Bryan Beegle is a multiple time PSAC champ, there is no debate here and the fact that you think it is debatable just reassures me of how dumb you are.
2. Sean Stetler- was the indoor 3k champ in 8:25 (Bud was in that race), and he has run 14:30's for 5k. Both are events that Bud runs, and Bud has lost to him in both. No debate here either.
3. Matt Gillette- got outkicked in the DMR...once. Big deal, Gillette has run 3:55 for 1500 and 14:54 for 5k, both PR's are better than Bud's. PLUS he actually shows up when it matters at PSAC's and scores points. Bud scored 0 outdoors. End of story.
4. Stephen Schelander- Also has run 3:55, and has run 14:50 for 5k. Both PR's better than Bud's. Look how he did outdoors last year, 4th in the 1500 and 3rd in the 5k at PSAC's. Bud scored 0. Not even a question.
5. Brandon Boyer- Doesn't have great PR's, but he is a great 10k guy and an all-American in cross. Bud runs the 5k, so does Boyer, i'll take a XC all-American over a sophmore with nothing to his name in a 5k race anyday. The nod goes to Brandon.
6. Jake Sitler- Bud runs the steeple and has run 9:13, but Jake ran 9:23 at the conference meet and got 4th and came up cluth with the points that his team needed to get the win. Where was Bud? Probably at prom with his HS girlfriend, that automatically makes Jake better. DEBATE OVER!
Hoovis
RE: XC Nationals 12/29/2010 3:52PM - in reply to Living on the edge Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Hmmm....retard, very nice. Obvious you're going to a state school with a vocabularly like that. Classy.

In terms of Beegle, okay, I was wrong. FWIW, I got that information right from the Ship Athletics website where their 2010 outdoor track roster has him listed as a senior. http://www.shipraiders.com/roster.aspx?path=mtrack&

In terms of Monroe & Haven, I was responding to the comment that there will be 6 guys from Ship & Boro each who will be better than Bud when it's all said and done. In terms of Ship, Haven, and Boro having 10 guys run 14:30...come on now. When's the last time the PSAC (as a conference) have 10 guys run that fast? Quite frankly, I don't think it's EVER happened.

I don't think it happend back when Uriel and gang were running for Boro and the Rock was strong with Laughlin and group and Ship was tough with Randy Lowe. They likely had a good 5-6 in the 14:30's or faster, but I doubt they had 10. It could've happened in the mid-80's when Platt and the Boro gang were really rocking it, but I don't think the other conference teams were as strong then...so, unlikely.

Just to give you a sense of how ridiculous 10 runners from 3 teams (so, 30 PSAC runners) running in the 14:30's or faster really is, consider the number (by year) for the past five years:

2010 Outdoor
1. Sean Stetler Shippensburg 14:32.95
2. AJ Johnson Lock Haven 14:35.47
3. Nathan Zondlo Lock Haven 14:35.80

2009 Outdoor
1. Chris Clark California (Pa.) 13:58.51
2. Jeff Weiss Slippery Rock 14:12.15

2008 Outdoor
1. Ryan Blood, Lock Haven 14:02.29
2. Jeff Weiss Slippery Rock 14:12.44
3. Chris Cummings Mansfield 14:15.63
4. Pat Reagan Slippery Rock 14:25.53
5. Ben Hahn Edinboro 14:31.38
6. Iuri Pinto East Stroudsburg 14:37.23

2007 Outdoor
1. Jeff Weiss Slippery Rock 14:04.94
2. Chris Clark California (Pa.) 14:12.62
3. Pat Reagan, Pat Slippery Rock 14:28.44
4. Jorge Medina Indiana (Pa.) 14:36.33
5. Iuri Pinto East Stroudsburg 14:38.30
6. Chris Robson Lock Haven 14:39.84

2006 Outdoor
1. Richard Hanslovan Shippensburg 14:25.70
2. Jeff Weiss Slippery Rock 14:28.57
3. John Somers Shippensburg 14:29.04
4. Chris Clark Clarion 14:32.37
5. Iuri Pinto East Stroudsburg 14:39.76

Hoovis


Living on the edge wrote:

Wow you are a retard. Beegle was a sophomore last year; way to act like you are all smart and really you are just talking out of your ass.

As for who will be better then Bud.

1. Bryan Beegle
2. Sean Stelter (also a F*#k up on your part)
3. Matt Gillette
4. Stephen Schlander
5. Brandon Boyer
6. Take your pick between Jake Sitler and Joel Flott.

Flott can beat him over the 800 and Sitler can beat him from 3k up.

Between these 7 guys Bud will have a hard time being top three in any event on the track you want to pick. Unless it's taking your HS girl to prom and skipping PSAC's then yes Bud wins.

And who care where these boys came from. This is the PSAC so virtually nobody comes from top programs. Everybody has been under trained and under coached. This does not make Bud special in any way. You are just like the guys that talk up Boise State and say how good they are so that they can sleep well at night. Everybody knows they suck but lets just keep telling them they are good and someday they will be. Join the real world.


What and who you should be talking about is Monroe from Lock Haven. If somebody is going to be a multiple AA then its him. Hell you are saying yourself Bud will be a 14:30-40 guy this year. Once again Ship, Haven, and Edinboro can have 10 guys do that this year. It's nothing special.

Is Bud a good athlete? Yes

Is he special? yes for Mansfield

Is he going to be a Multiple AA? No

Is Monroe better? Yes

Is Bud going to win a Conf title this year? Possible, if they let mansfield win the DMR or 4x800 again
Tootsy Toes
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 9:56AM - in reply to Hoovis Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I don't see how 10 is unrealistic.

If you put all 10 guys in a 5k with good conditions the conference has 10 sub 14:40 guys right now. Just because it hasn't happened in the past doesn't mean it couldn't have. I imagine in some of those years some of the guys ran 10k, steeple, or 1500.

1. Hilton (sub 30 and 8:53 steeple)
2. Monroe (True Frosh XC AA)
3. Zondlo (14:35)
4. AJ Johnson (14:35)
5. Tim Getz (14:46)
6. Hahn (14:32)
7. Anderson (9:03 HS 3200 and XC AA)
8. Beegle (14:26)
9. Stetler (14:32)
10. Gillette (14:54)
11. Schealander (14:50)
12. Brandon Boyer (XC AA)

Tell me which of those guys can't break 14:40 this year? Most of them will actually go after a fast 5k time too! I want to hear you bash some of these hard working guys and pick out which ones can't do it since its such a crazy idea that we could have 10 guys go sub 14:40 Hoovis.
Hoovis!
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 10:59AM - in reply to Tootsy Toes Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Tootsy -- I actually think we may be saying the same thing. There have been many years when the conference "could have" had 10 runners break 14:40. The 80's and early 90's were full of them, and I'm convinced the same could've happened in the 2006/07/08 timeframe as well. My point is that it didn't happen.

It's rare for the conference to have lots of people run a fast 5K in a given year. I will personally NEVER understand why the PSAC coaches don't get together and decide to load up Heat #2 of the 5K at Penn Relays. Stick all of the names you listed below (plus about 5 others just below that list) into that race and let them all go out and just run fast against each other. No conference points at stake...no reason to run conservative as often happens at states.

But, that won't happen (there will be 4-5 PSAC'ers in the 5K at Penn), so, the likelihood that 30 runners are suddenly going to do it this year (10 from Ship, 10 from Boro, and 10 from Haven) is, as I said above, ridiculous.

And, I still don't think there will be 10 folks (and history proves no more than 5-6 folks) who break 14:40 this year across the entire conference.

That's, in no way, bashing any of these folks. They're all way faster than I've ever run for 5K. That's just the practical, and sometimes unfortunate, circumstance of colleage track & field. The one time these guys will all line up against each other is in the 5K at conference and (depending on meet order as it's varied over the years), they'll either want to run conservative to save for doubling/tripling up, or they'll be tired from already having run a few events.

Tell your coaches to load up the 5K at Penn and let y'all have at a really fast 5K time. It's the one event to bring together all the steeplers, 10K runners, and 1,500 runners into one event and let them have at it. I'd love to see it, and I'm sure many of you would love to run it. I bet y'all could get 7-8 to break 14:40 in that one race alone.

Hoovis


Tootsy Toes wrote:

I don't see how 10 is unrealistic.

If you put all 10 guys in a 5k with good conditions the conference has 10 sub 14:40 guys right now. Just because it hasn't happened in the past doesn't mean it couldn't have. I imagine in some of those years some of the guys ran 10k, steeple, or 1500.

1. Hilton (sub 30 and 8:53 steeple)
2. Monroe (True Frosh XC AA)
3. Zondlo (14:35)
4. AJ Johnson (14:35)
5. Tim Getz (14:46)
6. Hahn (14:32)
7. Anderson (9:03 HS 3200 and XC AA)
8. Beegle (14:26)
9. Stetler (14:32)
10. Gillette (14:54)
11. Schealander (14:50)
12. Brandon Boyer (XC AA)

Tell me which of those guys can't break 14:40 this year? Most of them will actually go after a fast 5k time too! I want to hear you bash some of these hard working guys and pick out which ones can't do it since its such a crazy idea that we could have 10 guys go sub 14:40 Hoovis.
Hoovis!
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 11:01AM - in reply to Hoovis! Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
One correction to my last post...I wouldn't stick Hilton in the slow heat of the 5K at Penn. Dude should be running (in the front of) the fast heat there.

Hoovis
Living on the edge
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 11:27AM - in reply to Living on the edge Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Hoovis did you really think I meant that each team will have 10 sub 14:40 guys each for a total of 30?
CarlosLEE
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 12:39PM - in reply to Living on the edge Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
When Bud outkicked gillette in the DMR last year, wasn't his split around 4:28? oh yeah top notch stuff, that might get you to highschool states. I think gillette was burnt out from already running 4:11 and 8:33 earlier in the season. They aren't even close to the same level. Even a blind squirrel can find a nut every once in a while...
one two floor
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 4:11PM - in reply to CarlosLEE Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

CarlosLEE wrote:

When Bud outkicked gillette in the DMR last year, wasn't his split around 4:28? oh yeah top notch stuff, that might get you to highschool states. I think gillette was burnt out from already running 4:11 and 8:33 earlier in the season. They aren't even close to the same level. Even a blind squirrel can find a nut every once in a while...


Well if he was spent at the PSAC meet from running fast early the he wasn't ready for a championship race now was he?

Come on.
one two five
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 4:29PM - in reply to one two floor Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Maybe not the indoor meet, but what happened outdoors? Oh yeah, he ran 3:55 and got 3rd or 4th. Where was Bud? Oh yeah, 0 points.
one two floor
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 5:12PM - in reply to one two five Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Bud = Provisional Qualifier

Gillette = not
What Else
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 5:17PM - in reply to PeeSonmysACk Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

PeeSonmysACk wrote:

This post is aimed at "What Else" Hence the fact it says "Reply to What Else"

...so I want to start off by saying that you're a complete idiot. You probably haven't ever been to a conference meet and actually watched the distance races based off of what was said in your last post. I've been to 7 so far

1. Bryan Beegle is a multiple time PSAC champ, there is no debate here and the fact that you think it is debatable just reassures me of how dumb you are. Right, but we're looking at where people are now. He didn't have a dominant year where he was ahead of his team, instead he consistently finished with his pack (which isn't a knock against him or his pack, they were pretty damn good this year)
2. Sean Stetler- was the indoor 3k champ in 8:25 (Bud was in that race), and he has run 14:30's for 5k. Both are events that Bud runs, and Bud has lost to him in both. No debate here either. You're cherry-picking and switching around my argument to fit your own counter-argument. I said Bud focuses on the 800, 1500/Mile, and Steeplechase, hence the reason I restated that multiple times to make sure people got it right the first time, but ignorance is bliss.
3. Matt Gillette- got outkicked in the DMR...once. Big deal, Gillette has run 3:55 for 1500 and 14:54 for 5k, both PR's are better than Bud's. PLUS he actually shows up when it matters at PSAC's and scores points. Bud scored 0 outdoors. End of story. Again, I'm going by what shape they're in now, I can't speak for where Gillette is at the moment, but Bud ran 1:56 and 4:18 off a few weeks of base training. He obviously is not the same runner he was last year. I would guess with his speed and talent, he'd win any race this year that came down to a kick.
4. Stephen Schelander- Also has run 3:55, and has run 14:50 for 5k. Both PR's better than Bud's. Look how he did outdoors last year, 4th in the 1500 and 3rd in the 5k at PSAC's. Bud scored 0. Not even a question. Again, my argument has been for the events Bud runs. He ran one 5k last year, that's not a focus, that's a dabble. Ultimately Bud will be a great mid distance runner, namely the 1500/mile and steeplechase events. That one 14:58 5k he ran is irrelevant to this argument. Sorry
5. Brandon Boyer- Doesn't have great PR's, but he is a great 10k guy and an all-American in cross. Bud runs the 5k, so does Boyer, i'll take a XC all-American over a sophmore with nothing to his name in a 5k race anyday. The nod goes to Brandon. Again, Bud ran a 5k; he's focusing on the Steeple. Maybe with a better base he'll run more 5k's, but until then, he's not a 5Ker.
6. Jake Sitler- Bud runs the steeple and has run 9:13, but Jake ran 9:23 at the conference meet and got 4th and came up cluth with the points that his team needed to get the win. Where was Bud? Probably at prom with his HS girlfriend, that automatically makes Jake better. DEBATE OVER! Are you really trying to make an argument here? You argue like a 10 year old. Bud has run faster in the steeple. It's irrelevant that he didn't run it at conference. He still ran 10 seconds faster than Sitler ever did, and just as fast(or close) as Beagle did his freshman year. So what the guy ended up going to prom, his place in that race had no bearing on anything, no matter what the outcome. He wasn't going to win, "All-PSAC" is a rather empty award, so the guy was a good boyfriend and made it back home in time to make his GF happy. He's actually not with the same girl anymore, so that shouldn't be a factor this year, but come on man, how is that help your argument? It doesn't, it just makes you sound like an ass who hasn't really looked at anything subjectively because you're so far up Shippensburg's ass.


I'm also getting sick of blanket statements like "BUD NEVER SHOWS UP AT CONFERENCE, LOOK AT THE RESULTS!!!" because

A) The kid is only in the middle of his sophomore year
B) Is starting to show his upside already, with a good unfocused early season meet at Bucknell and then Kent State.
C) How many of our conference's great runners had average Freshman years and then broke out their Sophomore years? That seems to be the name of the game for schools like Lock Haven and Edinboro. Isn't it possible Bud is also making that jump?

So in conclusion, stop trying to debate if you're not going to look at all sides. This isn't the freakin' Mid-term elections. We're a little more grown up than that.
Don't Ask Don't Tell
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 6:14PM - in reply to What Else Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
You are getting Trolled hard and making yourself look pathetic. But at least Bud should be proud his little fan club will protect his pride on the boards..hahahha
one two floor
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 6:25PM - in reply to Don't Ask Don't Tell Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Don't Ask Don't Tell wrote:

You are getting Trolled hard and making yourself look pathetic. But at least Bud should be proud his little fan club will protect his pride on the boards..hahahha


Maybe, but Bud nor any of his friends started this thing
PonmyballSAC
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 6:30PM - in reply to What Else Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Like the guy said before me, you're pathetic. Give it up.
What Else
RE: XC Nationals 12/30/2010 9:59PM - in reply to Don't Ask Don't Tell Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Oh I know a troll when I see one, but I play ball just so anyone moseying our board for the first time (recruits, freshmen, etc.) don't get the wrong idea about the kid. It's funny that it's usually Ship-biased trolling that happens on this board.
PonmyballSAC
RE: XC Nationals 12/31/2010 6:40AM - in reply to What Else Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
"Play ball"? But anyways, you're obviously from Mansfield, and you're obviously close to Bud. That is why you're pathetic. Of course there is going to be a bias towards Ship, Haven, and Boro, they're the best teams by a long shot.
Changing of the tide?
RE: XC Nationals 12/31/2010 8:03AM - in reply to one two floor Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
No shit numbnuts, that's why its called getting trolled. Somebody says something outrageous to get everybody's panties in a bunch and they freak out.
Original
RE: XC Nationals 12/31/2010 11:51AM - in reply to PonmyballSAC Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

PonmyballSAC wrote:

"Play ball"? But anyways, you're obviously from Mansfield, and you're obviously close to Bud. That is why you're pathetic. Of course there is going to be a bias towards Ship, Haven, and Boro, they're the best teams by a long shot.


Of course they are the best teams. They have the most money in scholarships and budget by a long shot.
active guide
RE: XC Nationals 12/31/2010 11:58AM - in reply to Original Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
cry much?
What Else
RE: XC Nationals 12/31/2010 12:55PM - in reply to Changing of the tide? Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Simple but effective. Sometimes it's fun to go along and start a debate on this board, even if it's with someone who doesn't care what the outcome is.

and no, I don't go to Mansfield, I just like the kid and what he's all about.
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 | 251 | 252 | 253 | 254 | 255 | 256 | 257 | 258 | 259 | 260 | 261 | 262 | 263 | 264 | 265 | 266 | 267 | 268 | 269 | 270 | 271 | 272 |