Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 | 251 | 252 | 253 | 254 | 255 | 256 | 257 | 258 | 259 | 260 | 261 | 262 | 263 | 264 | 265 | 266 | 267 | 268 | 269 | 270 | 271 | 272 |
Psac
RE: Scholarship Stuff 4/11/2010 1:45PM - in reply to Watts For President Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Bucknell... ship distance in 5,000m nice. Hilton and Beagle in steeple.. nice. Neyhart in 1,500..nice.. Eidleman in 400.. nice. Women of ship.. 800..2:10 nice.. 1,500 nice..400 nice..Ok..honestly I don't pay attention to the field events but it seems psac people doing well there too. great job. Heard the temp/wind on Friday was scary cold.. times may have been even faster. Hope you get a warm, no wind.. fast day.. Good Luck. The Bucknell meet always seems to have cold weather Friday and then fine on Sat.
Dwight K. Schrute
RE: ........PSAC....... 4/11/2010 6:02PM - in reply to new thread starter Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Podunk School's Athletic Conference

That about right?
pffft
RE: Scholarship Stuff 4/11/2010 6:26PM - in reply to Psac Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I actually thought Dell and Spence ran kind of slow in the 1500. Maybe they were just tired from the 4x800? Or purposely not going all-out?
what else
RE: Scholarship Stuff 4/11/2010 9:52PM - in reply to pffft Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
The 4x800 was one of the last events Saturday afternoon. The 1500's were Friday night. Neely actually took a big fall at the beginning of that race and they had to call it back. Not sure how it affected her. She also tried make the bid for the win at 300 to go, right when the wind picked up dramatically.

My thoughts: she'll run faster.
leeeeo
RE: Scholarship Stuff 4/13/2010 9:17AM - in reply to what else Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
looks like sru's rector's lost his edge. 1st losing to freshman jewel in Raleigh and saturday he ran 2:01 at the sru home meet.
Happened upon it
RE: Scholarship Stuff 4/13/2010 3:49PM - in reply to leeeeo Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I saw Chris Clark is entered in the Mt. Sac 5K. Any word on what kind of shape he's in?
theeCALu
RE: Scholarship Stuff 4/13/2010 7:03PM - in reply to Happened upon it Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
13:42
sammmmy davis sr.
RE: Scholarship Stuff 4/15/2010 9:19AM - in reply to leeeeo Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
probably worked to hard indoors, now he's just struggling to get through the rest of outdoor.




leeeeo wrote:

looks like sru's rector's lost his edge. 1st losing to freshman jewel in Raleigh and saturday he ran 2:01 at the sru home meet.
interesting....
Girls 10k 4/15/2010 9:42PM - in reply to eggtown Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Has anyone else noticed that 7 PSAC girls have already provisionally qualified for nationals in the 10k (Jen Harp is the only one to auto)?
This seems even more impressive when you consider only 16 girls have qualified overall.
ship alum
Tom Pearson 4/17/2010 1:36PM - in reply to interesting.... Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Is tommy pearson mounting a comeback? I heard he is re-enlisting at WCU. Recent performance include:
100 meters: 14.5
200 meters:26.8
400 hurdles: 64
800: 2:06
1500: 4:09
5000: 15:30

The only thing I see that may halt this miraculous comeback is the purchase of a new dog. I imagine this will get in the way of his copious amounts of television watching. He will constantly be cleaning the house, which has already started, even before the dog has been brought home. Best of luck to this fine KG member, you are going to need it.
Hoovis!
Penn Relays Women's 5K? 4/21/2010 1:33AM - in reply to ship alum Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
How fast for Neeley? Her father/coach thought she was in killer shape indoors...can't wait to see this one.

How about Brenae? I know Brenae finished third at indoor nats, but it was a slow race. I think this could be a HUGE breakthrough race for her. Expect a good one.

Thoughts?

Hoovis
what else
RE: Penn Relays Women's 5K? 4/21/2010 9:23AM - in reply to Hoovis! Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Neely could probably break 16 if all goes well. Although, I don't think she'll win. I'm calling the win for Jackie Areson of Tennessee. Brenae will probably dip into high 16's again which would be great. Possibly 16:30's.
GGG
RE: Penn Relays Women's 5K? 4/21/2010 9:26AM - in reply to what else Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I agree Neely won't win, her time from Bucknell in the 15 wasn't good at all. Anyone know what's wrong with her?
what else
RE: Penn Relays Women's 5K? 4/21/2010 10:37AM - in reply to GGG Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Were you at the Bucknell meet? If you were there, it's obvious why no one ran fast.
GGG
RE: Penn Relays Women's 5K? 4/21/2010 12:45PM - in reply to what else Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
No, I wasn't. But why didn't she win? Seems a little weird for a multiple time national champ.
what else
RE: Penn Relays Women's 5K? 4/21/2010 1:58PM - in reply to GGG Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Wind was about mph in your face on back stretch. It was about 40 degrees at the time of the race as well. She also fell the first time they started, that probably shook her up a bit mentally. I'm not making excuses why she didn't win, just why it wasn't that fast. There were also more accomplished girls that beat her.
theory
RE: Penn Relays Women's 5K? 4/21/2010 2:38PM - in reply to what else Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
the women's 15 at Bucknell went out in 3:42 through the 1200, that's 4:56 1600m pace. for a bunch of sub 4:50 milers, they ran tactical. Ms. Spence took the lead into the wind and got blown by in the home stretch. That race was not a good indicator of anyone's fitness. period. Ms. Spence runs 15:52. Ms. Edwards needs to run an auto if she is going to make nationals again.
what else
RE: Penn Relays Women's 5K? 4/21/2010 2:42PM - in reply to what else Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

what else wrote:

Wind was about mph in your face on back stretch. It was about 40 degrees at the time of the race as well. She also fell the first time they started, that probably shook her up a bit mentally. I'm not making excuses why she didn't win, just why it wasn't that fast. There were also more accomplished girls that beat her.


20 mph gusting up to 30*, is what I meant to say.
Hoovis!
PSAC at Penn 4/23/2010 12:09AM - in reply to what else Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Some thoughts on the men....

Men's College 10K -- Nick Hilton from Haven was a beast. Great run for him. Has the guy ever even run a fast 10K on the track? Don't think so....and he ran sub-30. Awesome job. Getz' 30:46 was was solid too. But, Hilton looked unbeatable.

Men's College Steeple -- Beegle's 9:14 was solid. An improvement over the 9:21 he ran at Bucknell this year, but still slower than the 9:12's (if I remember) he ran twice at Bucknell in 2008. Haven's Miller ran 9;22 in the Championship race...should've been in the slow heat. Almost identical time to what he ran at Penn last year...but a good 10 secs+ faster than what he ran at Bucknell.

A few thougths on the women...

Women's College Steeple -- Mary Dell PR'd (I think) in the steeple. A 10:26 is very solid. Remember, this is a girl who was running the 200 just a few years ago when she was a frosh. She's very, very talented. Hope she keeps running after college...think she'll just keep getting better. Finishing 4th at Penn in this race is very good...pretty pressure packed with the "Squeegie crowd" screaming at you on each lap. Also, props to Clarissa Cummings from Mansfield. In the slow heat...could've easily gotten lost in the shuffle but I think she ran a huge PR. 20 second improvement over what she ran just a few weeks ago. She could finish the season strong.

Women's 5K -- Neeley 16:13...Brenae 16:43. Nothing else to say except for "as expected." In total, 5 PSAC girls under 18 minutes is good. Not great...but good.

Women's 10K -- Lambert's running just a tad over 36 is about what she did last year at Penn, so solid.

Overall, a good showing by the PSAC. Not the strongest and most depth I've ever seen, but certainly a good showing. Setting up nice for a great PSAC champs....especially on the ladies side.

Thoughts?

Hoovis
oh also
RE: PSAC at Penn 4/23/2010 1:21AM - in reply to Hoovis! Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
AJ Johnson and Nathan Zondlo of Lock Haven both running 14:35. Big PRs for those guys, from what I understand. There's some more depth for you!
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 | 251 | 252 | 253 | 254 | 255 | 256 | 257 | 258 | 259 | 260 | 261 | 262 | 263 | 264 | 265 | 266 | 267 | 268 | 269 | 270 | 271 | 272 |