Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 | 251 | 252 | 253 | 254 | 255 | 256 | 257 | 258 | 259 | 260 | 261 | 262 | 263 | 264 | 265 | 266 | 267 | 268 | 269 | 270 | 271 | 272 |
mplatt
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/26/2009 11:40AM - in reply to PSAC COACH Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

PSAC COACH wrote:

From experience I can vouch that distance guys are some of the hardest working and most consistant athletes across the board. Granted there are always exceptions which go both ways. Most sprinters are born fast and simply need fine tuning and strength training. Most distance guys are born average or below average and work their asses off to be successful. Until you can put you name on a post, do us all a favor and stop making yourself, your team, and you conference look like shit.

You never know who's watching


Maybe you meant to qualify that with some parameters.

But, if you really mean that "across the board", to apply to all athletes and all sports, well, your statement is simply dead-wrong.

Your view and understanding of accomplished sprinters is arrogant or blind, probably both.

You never know who is reading.
??
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/26/2009 1:30PM - in reply to mplatt Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
How is he wrong?

Name one sprinter who wasn't fast and then through practice became fast...

I bet you can't.. They all are fast and then get faster. It's natural, ask every coach you know (track, football, soccer, etc)..You can't teach someone how to be fast
mplatt
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/26/2009 5:15PM - in reply to ?? Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

?? wrote:

How is he wrong?

Name one sprinter who wasn't fast and then through practice became fast...

I bet you can't.. They all are fast and then get faster. It's natural, ask every coach you know (track, football, soccer, etc)..You can't teach someone how to be fast




I am not going to try and change your mind, but I will leave you with this advice:

This sport is much more beautiful and enjoyable when you truly understand it.

Have a good season.
not a distance runner
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/26/2009 5:51PM - in reply to mplatt Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I am not going to try and change your mind, but I will leave you with this advice:

This sport is much more beautiful and enjoyable when you truly understand it.

Have a good season.[/quote]



Well said.
not good advice
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/26/2009 6:40PM - in reply to not a distance runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
that was the stupidest advice ever.

do you think tyson gay ever ran over 12 secs for a hundred? you are either born with fast twitch muscles or you arent.. you can improve them to an extent by strength but you cant magically grow fast muscles. you are born fast, theres no disputing it.

im not saying sprinters dont work hard becuase they do, some work as hard as distance runners, and i have repect for them, but 85% of their ability is god given.

so dont come in here with that condescending "divine" quote saying we dont understand track... cuase its not track is science its just how the body works.

horrible advice.
not a distance runner
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/26/2009 7:57PM - in reply to not good advice Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
? and not good advise = dumb and dumber.
not good advice
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/26/2009 8:07PM - in reply to not a distance runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
care to elaborate? or do you just wana spell advice wrong again?
not a distance runner
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/26/2009 8:28PM - in reply to not good advice Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
slow distance runners would not understand
not good advice
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/26/2009 11:21PM - in reply to not a distance runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
and slow sprinters, actually any sprinters for that matter, cannot spell.
mitchell baxter
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/27/2009 12:42PM - in reply to not good advice Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
usain bolt was born running 9.69

he never trained.

get over yourself distance runner. you clearly are working yourself way "too hard".
ford rules
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/27/2009 8:23PM - in reply to mitchell baxter Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
here is this argument: take an average sprinter and an average distance runner. Match them up head to head in all track events, sprinter would take 100,200,400, 110 hurdles distance guy would take 800, 1500, steeple, 5k, 10k. 400 hurdles are a push. distance guy wins meet, has a bigger wiener, case closed.

and that's considering each event is run fresh; if its not, an even bigger edge goes to distance guy.
No fool
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/27/2009 8:43PM - in reply to ford rules Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Championships are won in the field. They are started in the distances. Sprints add on.

ALL ATHLETES work hard and should be repected.

NO thrower wants to run. No runner ever wants to throw the steel ball on a 35 degree day or could pick up the 35 lb weight.

Sprniter are born so are distance runners - both work to get better.

Shut up and respect.
ford rules
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/27/2009 8:51PM - in reply to No fool Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
It wasn't my argument jon von douche, it was just an argument.

By the way, I agree with you and respect every type of athlete who works hard regardless if its the 10k, long jump, or speed golf.
Needermeyer
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/27/2009 10:03PM - in reply to ford rules Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Does MXC count in this argument? My event I think would be sinkers and floaters. You never know if that thing is gonna sink or not. It's nuts!
mitchell baxter
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/27/2009 10:38PM - in reply to ford rules Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

ford rules wrote:

here is this argument: take an average sprinter and an average distance runner. Match them up head to head in all track events, sprinter would take 100,200,400, 110 hurdles distance guy would take 800, 1500, steeple, 5k, 10k. 400 hurdles are a push. distance guy wins meet, has a bigger wiener, case closed.

and that's considering each event is run fresh; if its not, an even bigger edge goes to distance guy.



absolutely retarded post.
First. The sprinter could add in jumping events.
Second. Only in the psac where everyone is so horrible woudl you think someone who can win the 800 would win the 5k and 10k.

Ford rules you are a complete moron. Go run a 1530 5k.
ford rules
RE: ........PSAC....... 2/28/2009 8:42AM - in reply to mitchell baxter Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
excuse me mr dick jiggle, but if you read the premise to the argument you would realize it considered only track events and only two people (an average sprinter and an average distance guy) not the whole conference.

And yes a sprinter would probably win at sinkers and floaters but little man in the boat would give an advantage to the distance guy b/c of his larger leg/upper body mass ratio.
BigBear
RE: ........PSAC....... 3/2/2009 7:18AM - in reply to mitchell baxter Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
EVERY athlete who is good at any event/sport has some natural talent. Every athlete who is great at their event has some natural talent AND has worked for a very long time to get where they are. (Weiss, Clarke, Strauman, Havko)
All you can do is train as much as possible and hope you're one of the lucky ones that get's chosen to run fast.
I was never good or great, but I had a hella time doing it!
The Bear
shipalum
RE: ........PSAC....... 3/2/2009 11:04AM - in reply to BigBear Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
wasn't the psac indoor meet this weekend? there's gotta be something that happened there that you guys want to talk about... i saw results, but does anyone have any insight?
PSAC FAN
RE: ........PSAC....... 3/2/2009 12:17PM - in reply to shipalum Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
The distance races were crazy overall. Beegle hammering in the mile, Weiss getting 6th. No one could have predicted that. In the 3k Weiss just hammered everyone, maybe getting revenge from the mile? 5k went out SLOOOOOOOW, then the last mile went real fast. Lots of bumping and pushing, Getz made a strong move and ran away with it, no one wanted to go with him with about 1k to go.
dipial
RE: ........PSAC....... 3/2/2009 12:58PM - in reply to PSAC FAN Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Weiss was never speed oriented. I know this from my experience in whooping on him.
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 | 251 | 252 | 253 | 254 | 255 | 256 | 257 | 258 | 259 | 260 | 261 | 262 | 263 | 264 | 265 | 266 | 267 | 268 | 269 | 270 | 271 | 272 |