That would really suck for the Brojos if this woman went on a crusade against everyone who wronged her.
That would really suck for the Brojos if this woman went on a crusade against everyone who wronged her.
Who "WRONGED" her? We discussed information that was made public.
It's just a matter of time before an athlete or coach has enough of this hater-filled message and goes after the Brojos and their Daddy's deep pockets. I know of more than a couple of elite names who have given the idea serious thought.
So why do you post here?
libel cases are extraordinarily difficult to win against individuals
the resident skeptic wrote:
Who "WRONGED" her? We discussed information that was made public.
Resident skeptic
There are so many people who crucified Marion here. They took her to Golgotha and nailed her on the cross.
I truly hope all these guys would just do the honourable thing and just swallow their STUPID PRIDE and apologise. It is not asking too much.
Yes, Marion should sue all these fellows. I truly hope she does.
I apologise, Marion. I was legally wrong. Brojos?
PS: Now I want to effing find out the diff between A sample testing and B sample testing, and why should there be a difference? Oh, and who blew a whistle on the A sample? Who the f**k is Riddick, anyway?
shrinker wrote:
That would really suck for the Brojos if this woman went on a crusade against everyone who wronged her.
Actually, it doesn't seem like they ever came out and called Jones a drug cheat. They said they weren't surprised when the A sample was positive, but they've never said anyone was "officially" a drug cheat unless the B was also positive. And repeating something that had already been reported by ESPN isn't grounds for a lawsuit. If the MSM was going to be sued, Jones would have to go after ESPN first, then probably other major sports programs like PTI. This site is probably less influential on the general public perception than the thousands of local news stations around the country. To sue this site, Jones might as well also sue every local sports reporter for defamation because they read the news about the positive A sample off their teleprompters.
The guy who effed up the most was the one who originally leaked the A result. When the SHTF, that's the guy who's going to get splattered by it.
She could go round to all the house's of all you f***s who posted bad things about her on the internet and beat you f***s up
Then she could sue all you f***s one at a time and spend millions on each case and she could prive taht the bad shit you wrote on the net cost her nothing and she would gert nothing
Master of the clit
I second that!
Remember unlike Floyd Landis or Lance Armstrong Marion's skin color isn't the same like most of the individuals on this site or the founders of this site. On this site people of color will always be found guilty before the facts are completely out.
God forbid if Goucher, Webb, or our 400M Gold Medalist runner were to have a bad A and/or B sample. Would we have the same witch hunt on this site? We all know the answer to that question (See difference with Landis/Armstrong postings from individuals who are not D. Pound or the French Media)
This is a great site that really supports the running community as it relates to having a public forum about running and to a lesser extent biking yet you better believe that most competitive US runners of color (sprints-distance) know about the bias of this site.
PS.. I believe the jury is still out on Gatlin. Stay tuned....
I quess Riddick leaked Latasha Jenkins as well, please , it doesn't make any sense. Why don't you people get a life. The both of them has done so much for the World of Athletics. None of you probably can't image what, and thats probably because you don't want to know. Haters.
A lot of the juvenile naysayers in this board owe a ton of apologies to Marion and many others. I love the opportunity to discuss issues, but am very bothered by the negative posters who use their anonymity to make accusations they wouldn't make if they were public.
I have had faith in Marion and I have faith in Justin Gatlin, too.
Just because this B sample is negative doesn't mean she is guilty....
Conta said she took drugs....
Even CJ hunter said she took drugs...
She was coached by Trevor Gramhee who is a known drug promoter....
Shoot she even had a baby with Tim M.
And she looks like a man…(that’s a joke for those who have no sense of humor)
Come on people no one owes her anything...she did drugs and probably still does drugs...she just got lucky on this one...
For the record...Landis is guilty to...so there I claimed a white guy and black women are guilty of drugs....for all those people who claim racism on everything….
She has passed dozens, if not hundreds of drug tests.
After Hunter and Conti claimed she doped, the USADA investigated her in 2003 and found nothing.
As part of that investigation, she took a lie dectator test and it came up positive.
Her b-sample was negative.
Fact is, youhave nothing on her. Why? Maybe because their is nothing to have on her.
All your stuck with is your hate, racism, and sexism.
Your Landis comment only shows how sensistive you are to your racist thoughts.
WDOWTIN wrote:
I second that!
Remember unlike Floyd Landis or Lance Armstrong Marion's skin color isn't the same like most of the individuals on this site or the founders of this site. On this site people of color will always be found guilty before the facts are completely out.
God forbid if Goucher, Webb, or our 400M Gold Medalist runner were to have a bad A and/or B sample. Would we have the same witch hunt on this site? We all know the answer to that question (See difference with Landis/Armstrong postings from individuals who are not D. Pound or the French Media)
Shut up and argue correctly if you're going to argue. The are distinct differences between Marion Jones' case and the other runners you mentioned. Namely Marion Jones' coaches history, testimony by close personal friends, and ties to BALCO who accused her of using the same drug her A sample tested positive for. Legally, she's innocent and has 'proven' that. At least add the other side of the arguement, jeeze.
she could...if she was clean....but passing the b sample of this test doesn't prove anything....other than this particular b sample is clean.
"positive" lie dectator means she was telling the truth when she said she did not dope.
hrmmm wrote:
she could...if she was clean....but passing the b sample of this test doesn't prove anything....other than this particular b sample is clean.
According to WADA/USADA the b-sample is most important sample. That is the sample that determines if one dopes. The a-sample means nothing.
The a-sample is done in an assembly line fashion and subject to errors. When it is positive, they have their best lab technicians carefully screen the b-sample in the company of witnesses for the ahtlete. They are very careful with the b-sample, less so with the a-sample.
So, a negative b-sample means everything. according the WADA/USADA she is as much a doper as you since you both negative b-samples (I'm assuming you would pass).
Excerpt from
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/trackandfield/columns/story?columnist=wojnarowski_adrian&id=2577044
These passages come right out of Game of Shadows, the devastating, groundbreaking book by authors Mark Fainaru-Wade and Lance Williams: "Hunter said he watched Jones inject herself with drugs at the residence they shared in Australia. After an injection, Jones would flush the syringe down the toilet. The steroids caused Jones to break out in acne, Hunter said. To hide it, she began wearing makeup, something she had never done before.
"... Conte also appeared to be pre-testing Jones to ensure she wouldn't fail a drug test at the Games. According to BALCO documents, a urine sample from Jones was sent by overnight mail to Quest Laboratories in San Diego two days before the Opening Ceremonies."
And there was this: "Like Montgomery, Marion Jones continued to use banned drugs in 2001, according to accounts by Conte and Hunter and BALCO documents with her name on them. On April 21, 2001, Conte said he met with Jones at the Embassy Suites hotel in Covina in Southern California. Jones came to his room so he could show her how to inject growth hormone with an new instrument, a $1,000 NovoPen injector. Conte said he watched Jones inject 4.5 units of Growth into her quadriceps."
What's more, the book detailed, "The doping calendars laid out, via Conte's alphabetical code, Jones's use of The Clear, EPO, Growth and insulin."
It goes on and on and on.
Not A Doctor wrote:
"positive" lie dectator means she was telling the truth when she said she did not dope.
you can buy a book at Barnes and Nobles that will tell you how to pass a lie detector test. only a complete idiot could fail one. thats why they are not admissable as evidence in court unless both parties agree on it.