your benevolent dictator
Just a quick update on the world marathon majors press conference held Thursday morning.
No major new news came out the conference but the race directors indicated they have seen increased media awareness of their events because of the new series. (The series awards $500,000 to the man and woman who scores the most points over 2 years in 6 marathons (Boston, Berlin, Chicago, NY, London and World Champs/Olympics. For more info on the series see this link:
Mary Wittenberg, race director of the ING NYC Marathon, said for example the NY Times sat down with her race and wanted more info on the series.
And while there was no major news announced, two developments were announced pertaining to the Flora London Marathon, one good and one bad.
First the bad: the Flora London Marathon will not be on television in the US this year despite having one of the the top men's marathon fields ever assembled. To get the race on tv this year, Dave Bedford, the London director said, "We could run the women with no shorts and tops".
And for the good, London went and talked to the shoe companies and they have agreed that the top athletes will not all wear the same color singlets this year. This should make it much easier for the casual fan to actually watch the races. See this link for the singlets:
The race directors said many other races have expressed interest in joining the series. Dave Bedford, said if any race will join the series it has to be a men's and women's race (this would rule out many japanese marathons), with mass participation (this also would rule out most of the Japanese marathons), and obviously with a strong commitment to the professional end of the sport.
And some of the US media wanted to know about the US Olympic Marathon Trials and how the race directors felt this race would affect the series (Boston and NY are bidding to host the trials in races held a day or 2 days before their main marathons). Mary Wittenberg said she felt US athletes are hurt by having a special trials race as American athletes are capable of "(winning) olympic medals... We think they are being shortchanged by being set aside in a separate race."
well, that can't be good for the future of the trials...or for those of us who set qualifying for the trials as a goal.
It's basically just collusion and corruption.
The rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
The big races see the writing on the walls.....they know that the world of marathons has grown much larger, so they have to do something, anything to set themselves apart from all the other marathons, and banding together in a kind of "marathon OPEC" is there way of going about it.
I don't think its corruption but there are some anti-trust concerns depending on how it is structured and athletes need to be watchful but mainly so far this is a marketing/branding arrangement. Hopefully it will continue to increase the popularity of the marathons because the series besides that only benefits one athlete a year which isn't good for athletes.
But to call it corruption/collusion at this point in time is unfair.
A law school student was writing a paper on this, maybe she'll write me back with what she found.
Sounds familiar. That has been my point since the World Marathon majors was announced.
Am I the only one that noticed that William Hill has Deena as 9/4 and the favorite to win?
I think the differnt colored kits are a great idea, but I found the fact that the sheet doesn't even have their pictures and only their uniforms humorous. It's like horse track program and all we need to know is their number and color. I was looking for a listing of the road conditions in their previous marathons to find a "mudder" if the weather is bad.