You can see the charges here:
You can see the charges here:
If it wasn't for guilt by association, there wouldn't be much to write about, eh?
Erbli wrote:
If it wasn't for guilt by association, there wouldn't be much to write about, eh?
Are you on crack? He might not be a ringleader, but he'll go down. He took $825,000.00 worth of checks and knowingly deposited them into his bank account. I can only imagine a prosecuter asking him what Riddick thought the $825,000 was payment for.
I was referring to Jones, sweetie.
I honestly don't see how you can expect to fake checks for that amount of money and not get caught. Someone's gonna NOTICE, ya know?
Try the Seattle papers about what people will believe...great story about loans (big loans...2+ million) all based on lies and no documents.
No one has time to verify things anymore and there's always the chance it'll slip through a crack...
Erbli wrote:
I was referring to Jones, sweetie.
Thanks, Brokeback, but I just can't see the "guilt by association" analogy. I mean, one is suspected of being a drug cheat in sports, the other suspected of bank fraud...
I just dont see how someone could be so stupid as to think that they were going to get away with such a scam, especially since he changed the name of the check to his own company. It's a bit like robbing a bank and giving the teller your name and phone number on the way out.
If the bank deposit slip doesn't fit, you must acquit
Wasn't this the same guy who was telling the world that bee pollen was his secret, back in 1976?
Is there any confirmation of this? Note that the supposed link to the "indictment" is just a Wikipedia entry on SR. Anyone have any reliable information here?
Erbli wrote:
If it wasn't for guilt by association, there wouldn't be much to write about, eh?
misplaced comma(s), but do you really know who Steve Riddick was?
26mi235 wrote:
Is there any confirmation of this? Note that the supposed link to the "indictment" is just a Wikipedia entry on SR. Anyone have any reliable information here?
Did you not read the story on the website:
http://www.letsrun.com/2006/riddick.phpit has links to the indictment. It explains it all. It's pretty straight forward.
26mi235, what does the 235 stand for?
26mi235, what does the 235 stand for?
What happened in 2000?
should be 385.
The link does not show the indictment, only a Wikipdeia page. Does anyone actaully have a working link to the indictment?
PB I bet.
qwestion wrote:
26mi235, what does the 235 stand for?
Careful, this story is not found on internet except here and at RunTex. Is there any independent outside link?