So juiced. Juiced beyond juiced. I hope that she goes to prison for a long time.
So juiced. Juiced beyond juiced. I hope that she goes to prison for a long time.
here we go again.... wrote:
She was talking about the ethics of using a tent versus the unethical use of EPO. So she tried an altitude tent and decided not to use it again because she wanted to stick with altitude training, which by the way she says doesn't alter her blood phsyiology. But to you that means she uses an altitude tent?
Her words are being misrepresented. And by you too, which is what I expect from you.
Links/sources?
It's all speculation because there's no evidence to say she doped, but consider this: Paula's marathon WR is the greatest athletic achievement from a woman ever. For a woman's physiology, that is much more impressive than the men's marathon WR. The fact that no woman has come close to challenging it, makes me raise an eyebrow.
Moronic wrote:
here we go again.... wrote:She was talking about the ethics of using a tent versus the unethical use of EPO. So she tried an altitude tent and decided not to use it again because she wanted to stick with altitude training, which by the way she says doesn't alter her blood phsyiology. But to you that means she uses an altitude tent?
Her words are being misrepresented. And by you too, which is what I expect from you.
Links/sources?
The source is his/her bizarro alternate reality, i.e., pulled straight from his/her ass.
Tyrannosaurus Rexing wrote:
Moronic wrote:Links/sources?
The source is his/her bizarro alternate reality, i.e., pulled straight from his/her ass.
He's regressed from an idiot to a fcukwit.
GoodTimes wrote:
Paula's marathon WR is the greatest athletic achievement from a woman ever. For a woman's physiology, that is much more impressive than the men's marathon WR. The fact that no woman has come close to challenging it, makes me raise an eyebrow.
You have no idea what you're talking about, do you.
Radcliffe's WR is about 10-11% slower than the men's WR, which is the same as for almost every event in athletics.
The fact that women's marathoning isn't very deep (read: under-participation by east African women) is the only reason the WR looks like such an outlier. If all the women who were trouncing Radcliffe in the 10,000 had gone straight to the marathon as 20 year-old Kenyan and Ethiopian men are now, 2:15 would be 2:03 (i.e. there would be a pile of 2:16 right behind).
She doesn't use altitude tents or doping or whatever.
So she slept a few nights in such a device. She soon realized how it was of no use to her.
Is that so hard to understand?
Her blood numbers are 39-42 hematocrit regardless of how long she spends at altitude, i.e. normal numbers.
here we go again... wrote:
She doesn't use altitude tents or doping or whatever.
So she slept a few nights in such a device. She soon realized how it was of no use to her.
Is that so hard to understand?
Her blood numbers are 39-42 hematocrit regardless of how long she spends at altitude, i.e. normal numbers.
Wouldn't be hard to understand or believe if you were to provide links/sources. In the meantime you've now regressed further to a total fcukwit.
here we go again... wrote:
She doesn't use altitude tents or doping or whatever.
So she slept a few nights in such a device. She soon realized how it was of no use to her.
Translation: She tried doping for awhile, and has now realized it was no use to her, so she's going to retire.
for the hundreth time, she's never doped. She's consumed far too many sweets in a lifetime so there is an addiction there...
She's got fire and kick to her though, she'll make it.
Irrelephant wrote:
Why are there so many Paula Radcliffe haters? I don't see anyone questioning the increasing handful of men in the 2:04 neighborhood.
Is there an increasing handful of women in the 2:15 neighborhood to match?
Why can some people just not grasp the simple concept, much less the possible implications, of gross statistical outliers?
Devil's Thumbtack wrote:
Why can some people just not grasp the simple concept, much less the possible implications, of gross statistical outliers?
Where's Ventolin when you need him?
------------------------------------------------------
Nutella1 wrote:The Brojo pacing was in Chicago, not in London when she ran 2:15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
it was the "just" kenyans race then
What does that mean?
Just for once admit you were wrong
Moronic wrote:Where's Ventolin when you need him?
all i can say is that paula, despite drafted by some kenyans to long way ( & there were couple alongside for glory run to finish ) was in
track shape in '03 M of prelim estimate
~
59.0 /2'03.4 ->
4'00.6
5'26.4
8'21.4
14'20.5
29'48.5
to
59.0 /2'03.3 ->
4'00.2
5'25.8
8'20.3
14'18.2
29'42.7
her 10k ability that day is of interest ( albeit she couda smashed the 5k wr ( 14'28 at the time, 14'24 later in '04 )
Isn't Paula retiring in feb 3rd 2013? Mara Yamauchi retire jan 22 2013.
10 months since her last race on feb 15th 2013. How the fuc* is that not retirement. Paula not retiring but no racing.
Isn't their some story with foot surgery?
'Track shape in '03 M of prelim estimate
59.0 /2'03.4 ->
4'00.6
5'26.4
8'21.4
14'20.5
29'48.5'
What about her marathon time?
"there"
rekrunner wrote:
Isn't their some story with foot surgery?
2:15:38
ukathleticscoach wrote:
'Track shape in '03 M of prelim estimate
59.0 /2'03.4 ->
4'00.6
5'26.4
8'21.4
14'20.5
29'48.5'
What about her marathon time?